Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    4:17 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: US politics > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: What about Benghazi? Back to Topics
mexicomaria

Champion Author
Minnesota

Posts:28,197
Points:2,092,870
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jul 16, 2013 9:19:29 PM

"There were 4 Americans murdered in Benghazi…and yes, it was terrorism. There were 4 Americans murdered at the Boston marathon…and yes, it was terrorism. I am glad the Administration put all the resources it did into finding the bombers in Boston – it was important. The Administration did exactly right in investigating in Boston (the jury is still out on what the Administration did or did not do before the bombing.) But why are our 4 murdered Americans in Benghazi not so important? I think they are." Greta Van Susteren

I still care.....what are we doing about the men we identified (???) that killed Americans in Benghazi?

REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:6,049
Points:1,664,890
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2015 9:47:45 AM

"Just so hard for weasel to remember that four men died here, alone, no help and that they were part of a lie, second death. Now, weasel wants us to just kick them down the road' and call it good, enough, we know all the truth, nothing here..........."

Just keep reminding him of the truth...it just burns his back side
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,197
Points:2,092,870
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2015 10:53:59 AM

Just so hard for weasel to remember that four men died here, alone, no help and that they were part of a lie, second death. Now, weasel wants us to just kick them down the road' and call it good, enough, we know all the truth, nothing here...........

God help us when men/women in the service just become an annoyance, become a let's move on, what does it matter.

Because if it matters not for them, it matters not for any foreign service worker for the USA. In Saudi Arabia it matters, but not the USA or to weasel. Really tells me a lot about our leader and his values and weasel and his values. Were you ever in any of the services, weasel, men from the service never talk like you do.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,888
Points:650,070
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2015 10:26:24 AM

"What does it matter now"

*SQUWAK*!

"then admit the FACT that Hillary has been sneaky & underhanded in all he dealings?"

Yes, she has been sneaky and underhanded in many dealings, going all the way back to Whitewater. I am neither a fan of her nor her Husband...
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2015 10:14:16 AM

hilllarybenghazi
Profile Pic
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:6,049
Points:1,664,890
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2015 9:18:14 AM

SO...then admit the FACT that Hillary "What does it matter now" Clinton has been sneaky & underhanded in all he dealings?
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,888
Points:650,070
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2015 9:51:51 PM

Lol, thanks for proving my point, folks. It isn't the truth for many conservatives here unless it paints democrats in a bad light...

Yes, liberals have had their share of scandals and lies, but you know what? Conservatives have too. So again, thanks for proving my point ??
Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,948
Points:2,634,625
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2015 5:49:26 PM

Weasel: <<<"What concerns me are people who don't accept the truth unless what is presented is what they want the truth to be...">>>

--Apparently you have amnesia too?
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:29,026
Points:920,905
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2015 3:06:38 PM



Weaslespit, "What concerns me are people What concerns me are people who don't accept the truth unless what is presented is what they want the truth to be...

So you are saying that Hillary has been telling the truth and has been totally open and above board? And the State Department as well? And Obama and his White House as well?

Or is it that YOU that won't "accept the truth unless what is presented is what they want the truth to be..."

Hmmmmmmmmmmm?

Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,888
Points:650,070
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2015 2:44:09 PM

"What concerns me in America is that so few folks care about truth, they just plain don't care. "

What concerns me are people who don't accept the truth unless what is presented is what they want the truth to be...
Profile Pic
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:10,141
Points:1,866,450
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2015 1:09:55 PM

It’s embarrassing when the UN is more willing to be open about terrorism than the US State Department.

State Dept Still Trying to Cover Up Benghazi Terror Attack
Profile Pic
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:10,141
Points:1,866,450
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Apr 15, 2015 12:31:38 PM

The rabbit hole goes a little deeper than first thought on the Clintonemail server scam run by Hillary Clinton outside of the State Department, and outside the reach of the Federal Records Act. Previously, it appeared that Congress only asked the former Secretary of State about private e-mail records in August 2014, when the House Select Committee on Benghazi began looking through State Department communications. Today, though, the New York Times’ Michael Schmidt reports that Darrell Issa had at least some curiosity on the point in December 2012, when he queried Hillary directly on the point.

NYT: Congress asked Hillary in December 2012 about private e-mail
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,197
Points:2,092,870
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Apr 15, 2015 10:45:33 AM

EZ....so we could write Beng azi... THe "H" is silent, also the "H" lied, also the "H" scrubbed her computer, also the "H" was on fire to get out of that job, Sec. of State.

Her worst nightmare is Trey Gowdy.
Profile Pic
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:6,049
Points:1,664,890
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Apr 15, 2015 8:20:08 AM

"If you are on the gravy train all you care about is next month's check or debit card recharge. If your goal is to leverage power for yourself by using the race card, you don't care what else happens as long as the power of that card keeps increasing. If your goal is to protect your vested interest in the cash flow coming from all those paying union members, you don't care what else happens as long as that cash continues to flow.

The democrat party is filled with single issue groups who are part of the party for the sole reason of forwarding their agenda. They could care less about anything else other than making sure that their cause gets its share of money and power from the candidate if she wins. "

Thank you Mud for stating that clearly.
Liberal Democrats do not care about you...only that they win.
Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,948
Points:2,634,625
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Apr 14, 2015 5:17:22 PM

I saw a bumper sticker today... It spells "Benghazi" (picture the "h" in "Benghazi" as the new corporate branding symbol that HilLiary has launched) and underneath this it states: "The "H" is silent", with a picture of a pissy looking HilLiary with crossed arms.

Benghazi
The "H" is Silent

[Edited by: EZExit at 4/14/2015 5:17:58 PM EST]
Profile Pic
mudtoe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:15,107
Points:2,083,880
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Apr 14, 2015 12:20:53 PM

mxm: "What concerns me in America is that so few folks care about truth, they just plain don't care. "


If you are on the gravy train all you care about is next month's check or debit card recharge. If your goal is to leverage power for yourself by using the race card, you don't care what else happens as long as the power of that card keeps increasing. If your goal is to protect your vested interest in the cash flow coming from all those paying union members, you don't care what else happens as long as that cash continues to flow.

The democrat party is filled with single issue groups who are part of the party for the sole reason of forwarding their agenda. They could care less about anything else other than making sure that their cause gets its share of money and power from the candidate if she wins.

mudtoe
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,197
Points:2,092,870
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Apr 14, 2015 12:07:04 PM

I admire Trey's tenacity, but the Clinton's have always been secretive. There has to be a blue dress somewhere that Hillary is not aware of that will tell the truth. It is so easy to lie, but truth is lighter than muck. It will come out.

What concerns me in America is that so few folks care about truth, they just plain don't care. Most voters don't even know there is a lie, they are just plain not well read, but then you have the ones that are aware and are well read and just don't care. Those are a scary lot. Means never matter to them, only the end. How would you like one of those folks to have your back.

Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,948
Points:2,634,625
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Apr 14, 2015 11:56:55 AM

Snip <<<"...Toward that end and because of the Secretary’s unique arrangement with herself as it relates to public records during and after her tenure as Secretary of State, this Committee is left with no alternative but to request Secretary Clinton appear before this Committee for a transcribed interview to better understand decisions the Secretary made relevant to the creation, maintenance, retention, and ultimately deletion of public records. The Committee is willing to schedule the interview at a time convenient for Secretary Clinton, but no later than May 1, 2015.

The Committee believes a transcribed interview would best protect Secretary Clinton’s privacy, the security of the information queried, and the public’s interest in ensuring this Committee has all information needed to accomplish the task set before it.

Once there is a reasonable assurance all documents in the Secretary’s care, custody and control related to what happened before, during, and after the attacks in Benghazi have been shared with the Committee, we will be in a position to schedule her appearance in a public hearing to constructively discuss these topics. We share the Secretary’s desire these two conversations take place as quickly and efficiently as possible, and are willing to expedite both working with your office, the Secretary’s schedule and our Democrat colleagues on the Committee. What the Committee cannot do is conclude its work without assurances the Committee has all relevant information necessary for us to discharge the duties required of us.

We continue to believe Secretary Clinton’s email arrangement with herself is highly unusual, if not unprecedented. The decision to delete these records during the pendency of a congressional investigation only exacerbates our need to better understand what the Secretary did, when she did it, and why she did it. While she has cited a variety of justifications for this arrangement, many questions and details about the arrangement remain unanswered. These questions relate to:

1) her decision to bypass an official government email account;

2)whether she affirmatively turned over any relevant records during the pendency of the Accountability Review Board investigation or at any time after Congress first began investigating the Benghazi attack until December 2014;

3) her decision to retain those records upon separation from the Department of State;

4) the methodology by which these emails were subsequently searched for evidence of official records; and

5) her decision to delete certain emails.

The Committee also reiterates pending the resolution of this matter the server and any associated information, data, backups, and equipment must be preserved wherever they reside and that any further deletion or destruction of data or information must cease. As you should be well aware, it is technically possible in many instances to recover electronic information notwithstanding whether it has been “deleted” or overwritten. It is precisely for this reason a neutral and objective party must have access to the server and related equipment to identify information potentially responsive to relevant laws and investigative requests.

We look forward to working closely with you to schedule both Secretary Clinton’s private transcribed interview related to her email arrangement as well as her public appearance before the Committee.

Sincerely,

Trey Gowdy
Chairman">>>

Select Committee Formally Requests Secretary Clinton Interview on Email Arrangement
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 14, 2015 10:59:20 AM

Lets never forget!!
Hillarybenghazi
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 11, 2015 4:23:42 PM

HillaryBenghaz
Profile Pic
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:10,141
Points:1,866,450
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Apr 11, 2015 12:58:17 PM

House Republicans investigating the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks in Benghazi and the private email use of Hillary Clinton when she was secretary of state say her expected presidential run will not affect their work, Politico reported Friday. Benghazi Panel's Republicans Unfazed by Hillary's 2016 Plans
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,197
Points:2,092,870
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2015 12:42:39 PM

My question is,,,,was it Pres. Obama's final "get even" to name Hillary, Sec. of State. He pretty much helped her have a negative history in service, by putting her in collusion with him over Benghazi....and all secret, underhanded actions.

Obama is a "get even" guy, with a memory like an elephant...try Netanyahu...if you don't believe he does get even, to the point of being childish on twitter.
Profile Pic
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:10,141
Points:1,866,450
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2015 12:32:04 PM

The Russian reset, sniper fire, Benghazi and Clinton Foundation donations are all featured in the mash-up, which concludes: “This is just par for the course for the Clintons. They’re always a little bit secretive.”

Republicans Release ‘Stop Hillary’ Ad Ahead of Announcement
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2015 10:55:10 AM

over for hillarybenghazi
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 8, 2015 10:47:10 AM

hillarybenghazi NO no no no!!
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,197
Points:2,092,870
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Apr 8, 2015 9:39:53 AM

Well, the truth is always lighter than mud, muck, and lies...it will rise to the top.
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:29,026
Points:920,905
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Apr 8, 2015 9:13:18 AM



Libya says 'new elements' in killing of US ambassador

"Benghazi (Libya) (AFP) - Libya's internationally recognised parliament said Tuesday it has uncovered "new elements" behind the 2012 assassination of the US ambassador when the American consulate was stormed in eastern city Benghazi.

"I have been tasked today with leading a team of inquiry," Tareq Saqar al-Jeruchi, deputy head of the parliament's security and defence committee, told AFP.

He said the team had "new elements on the real perpetrators of the attack" and would work closely with the FBI and Congressional commissions of inquiry, although he did not elaborate on the identities of the assailants.

A Libyan parliamentary delegation is to travel to the United States for consultations with members of Congress, Jeruchi said."

Profile Pic
lvskyguy
Champion Author Las Vegas

Posts:8,375
Points:1,291,960
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Apr 7, 2015 12:44:17 PM

"Hellary?" "Hill NOoooooooooooo!"
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,197
Points:2,092,870
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Apr 7, 2015 11:37:47 AM

I am with Popcorn, I believe, but will we ever know, she just went back to bed, after they had the spin right.
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 7, 2015 10:48:30 AM

Is there any gas buddies that would vote hellarybenghazi?
Profile Pic
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:6,049
Points:1,664,890
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Apr 7, 2015 9:48:54 AM

It begs the question.
If there was ever a crisis....who would you want to be the POTUS to make that decision???
Definitely not Hillary..>!
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 4, 2015 12:21:37 PM

Never never never never never never hillary president!!!!!!
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2015 10:35:25 AM

benghazihillary
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2015 11:32:15 AM

hillarybenghazi--trust me--what difference does it make??
Profile Pic
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:6,049
Points:1,664,890
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2015 9:44:42 AM

Richard " i am not a crook" Nixon
Ronald " Grant amnisty for Illegal aliens" Reagan
William Jefferson " I did not sleep with that woman" Clinton
Georg W " WMDs in Iraq" Busch
Barack H "I have a Pen & a Phone" Obama
Hillary "What does it matter now" Clinton ( with an added Alfred E Newman to her "Trust Me" )

[Edited by: PopcornPirate at 4/2/2015 9:45:11 AM EST]
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:29,026
Points:920,905
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Apr 1, 2015 11:06:15 AM



daylily, AKA Hillary Milhouse Clinton!

;-)

Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 1, 2015 10:58:05 AM

way to go ---hillarybenghazi-what difference does it make?
Profile Pic
mudtoe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:15,107
Points:2,083,880
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 5:21:50 PM

I75: "After the subpoena and turnover, find a recipient who received emails from Clinton. Let's choose "Jen Psaki" jenP@State.gov - she may have received a few over the years. "


That assumes that some of the emails cherry picked to remain on the server are to or from some of the same people who had incriminating emails deleted. If I were the person sanitizing Clinton's email server I wouldn't make that mistake. The only emails I'd leave on the server would involve people whom Hillary would be expected to communicate with about personal matters (e.g. her daughter, personal friends, contractors, doctors, attorneys, etc.).

The only way to really catch her is to go after people you would suspect that she had clandestine communications with and don't see on the server. This has two drawback though. First, you might have trouble subpoenaing their email records with no supporting evidence they were involved. Second, and this is far more likely, if the person had an account on Hillary's email server for the purpose of these clandestine communications, and the person was careful not to login to Hillary's server to read emails on that account via a government computer, then there will be no record of the account ever having existed, and of course it would be long gone from Hillary's server per the procedure I described below.

She's only going to get caught if she and her I/T people were careless, and/or the people she communicated with were careless about where they logged in to her server (if I were her I/T person I would have set the firewall in her email server not to accept connections from the blocks of IP addresses assigned to government, or IP addresses with a reverse dns lookup that showed it was coming from a domain name ending in .gov, as a safety net against people being stupid).


mudtoe


[Edited by: mudtoe at 3/31/2015 5:22:03 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,888
Points:650,070
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 2:01:59 PM

"Of course the leftist lapdog media won't cover it but Michelle Malkin and Breitbart will."

Why wait for them to cover a potential finding when Beck would be more than happy to simply fabricate some evidence so he can levy some more baseless accusations?

Or do you think he learned his lesson by falsely accusing the Saudi Kid of being involved with the Boston Bombers? ;)

Besides Hillary, who else is a potential candidate for the Dems? Biden is a joke, Cuomo is too Liberal... Don't really recognize too many names after that. The GOP doesn't have to work too hard this election cycle, they just need a solid candidate, an all-star does not look to be required in 2016.

Just sayin' all of the Hillary stuff is a bit over the top, the beating of the dead horse was applicable to this thread a year ago.
Profile Pic
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:76,061
Points:3,309,135
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 1:54:47 PM

Mud, there is another step that investigators can take to try to find some emails that "don't exist". After the subpoena and turnover, find a recipient who received emails from Clinton. Let's choose "Jen Psaki" jenP@State.gov - she may have received a few over the years. You subpoena her records. You see the ones on there that Clinton has left in existence. Then, lo and behold, there are more, more, more emails that jenP received than Clinton turned over. At that point the continued lie is exposed, the coverup is exposed, and it's Game Over for the Duchess of the Downtrodden.
Where are the rest of the emails, Hillary? The ones we can see were received by others but that you don't admit to sending?
Of course the leftist lapdog media won't cover it but Michelle Malkin and Breitbart will.



[Edited by: I75at7AM at 3/31/2015 1:55:29 PM EST]
Profile Pic
mudtoe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:15,107
Points:2,083,880
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 12:01:04 PM

It really won't matter if she turns over the server to be examined because I'm virtually certain that they won't find anything. Given that they had time and control of the server, it's very easy to make sure that there is no forensic evidence left. It can be done in just a few easy steps:

1). Delete all the emails you want to go away, or better yet move everything to the deleted items folder and then cherry pick some things to put back in your inbox (doing it this way makes sure you don't accidentally miss anything that needs to be deleted).

2). Empty deleted items folder.

3). Backup the email account using backup software that only transfers things from the mailbox itself (i.e. it doesn't backup the entire mail server database or anything that has been deleted).

4). Take down the server, remove the hard drive(s) containing the mail server database, and destroy them.

5). Install brand new empty hard drive(s) into the server and initialize a new mail server database.

6). Restore the emails backed up in step 3 to the email server.

7). Destroy all hard drives containing any backups of the email server taken prior to step 5.


Now all that the mail server server database contains are the emails you want it to have and there are no remains of deleted emails for any forensic analysis because they were never on that database in the first place, and the backups of that prior database containing incriminating emails are also gone. I'm 100% certain that's what the Clinton's had done, given that they had time to make it happen and had control of the hard drives, plus they had the fresh lesson Lois Lerner's IRS emails to remind them of the need to make sure that no forensic information or backups remain.


mudtoe



[Edited by: mudtoe at 3/31/2015 12:04:20 PM EST]
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:29,026
Points:920,905
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 11:42:04 AM



Things could get a little hot in the kitchen for Hillary as she bakes cookies!

ROTFL

Benghazi panel summons Clinton

"A House panel Tuesday formally requested Hillary Clinton to testify about the private server and email account she used while serving as secretary of state.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, sent a request to Clinton's personal attorney, David E. Kendall, requesting that Clinton appear before the committee no later than May 1 for a transcribed interview about the server and email.

The request comes after Kendall told Gowdy that the server had been wiped clean and that it would be impossible to recover the 30,000 emails Clinton deleted last year.

Gowdy, in his request to Kendall, also asked Clinton to "reconsider" her refusal to turn over the server to a neutral third party, which he called "highly unusual, if not unprecedented.""

How do we KNOW that Hillary turned over all her relevant emails.

Hillary said, "TRUST ME", that is how we know!

ROTFL

Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 11:18:59 AM

what difference does it make?? Hillarybenghazi
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,888
Points:650,070
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 11:16:11 AM

"We all know you love to respond in kind words around here...!

Are you saying your constant derogatory (and incorrect) comments constantly spewed against Hillary are kind?

Interesting.
Profile Pic
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:6,049
Points:1,664,890
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2015 9:28:10 AM

Hillary "What does it matter now" Clinton
Here you go Weasel
We all know you love to respond in kind words around here...!
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,727
Points:1,341,775
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 6:26:19 PM

Hillarybenghazi what difference does it make?
Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,948
Points:2,634,625
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 5:10:04 PM

I dare Clinton to ask "what difference does it make?" when asked about purging improperly kept government correspondence.
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:29,026
Points:920,905
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 5:04:01 PM



flyboy, now there is a perfect commercial that should start running today and run every day until Election Day 2016!

Profile Pic
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,577
Points:1,757,565
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 4:52:16 PM

Well if there were any doubts this should clear things right up
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,888
Points:650,070
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 4:50:07 PM

POLITICIANS - CORRUPT to the core.

There, fixed it for A1.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,888
Points:650,070
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 4:36:10 PM

"More than that, virtually everyone on the dole, if they vote, will vote democrat in order to maximize their chances of staying on the gravy train. Romney was right about the that."

He just wasn't right about how many were on the dole to be on the dole...
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:29,026
Points:920,905
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 12:59:32 PM



nraacct, "a question remains: Did Clinton destroy documents that were under subpoena from Congress?"

Hillary wiped her server clean AFTER the subpoena.

That ALONE ought to earn her a rent free stay in the GrayStone Hotel!

DEMOCRATS - CORRUPT to the core.

Post a reply Back to Topics