Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    3:01 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: US politics > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: What about Benghazi? Back to Topics
mexicomaria

Champion Author
Minnesota

Posts:27,158
Points:1,848,985
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jul 16, 2013 9:19:29 PM

"There were 4 Americans murdered in Benghazi…and yes, it was terrorism. There were 4 Americans murdered at the Boston marathon…and yes, it was terrorism. I am glad the Administration put all the resources it did into finding the bombers in Boston – it was important. The Administration did exactly right in investigating in Boston (the jury is still out on what the Administration did or did not do before the bombing.) But why are our 4 murdered Americans in Benghazi not so important? I think they are." Greta Van Susteren

I still care.....what are we doing about the men we identified (???) that killed Americans in Benghazi?

REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 24, 2014 8:58:12 AM

"It's all about weakening Hilary for 2016. NOTHING more or less."

It is about a 'little' more, since it will also be used to weaken Obama and thusly 'any' democratic candidate since the GOP loves to try to tie 'any' challenger to Obama as a reason not to vote for said candidate...

It really is sad when somebody thinks they are being heard and somebody is looking out for them, only to realize years later they were being duped for simple political gain.

Profile Pic
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:7,974
Points:1,544,395
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Oct 24, 2014 2:36:36 AM

"It's all about weakening Hilary for 2016. NOTHING more or less."

The above words will not comfort the families of the dead American heroes.

Former CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson links her computer intrusions to Benghazi reporting

10-23-14

"I was at home working on questions for yet another story that the Obama administration was unhappy with related to the Benghazi terrorist attacks. And as I was typing and working on questions for a Benghazi-related story, the data started wiping kind of at hyperspeed, being deleted, as if my computer had been hijacked and I had no control over it. I had a phone next to me, so I was able to sort of get a tilted picture of a little bit of the data being deleted. I knew because I’d had so many anomalies over the past year and a half, two years that somebody was interfering with the computer. It was described to me by the computer experts I consulted with afterwards that that was purely an attempt to let me know that they could do that, that they were watching, that they were in my computer. So I think in general, I’m just one of the reporters, top on the list of those that they watch and that they disagree with and that they fight."


[Edited by: mweyant at 10/24/2014 2:37:36 AM EST]
Profile Pic
mudtoe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:13,834
Points:1,875,805
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Oct 24, 2014 12:40:33 AM

dl: "hope we learn about benghazi"


Definitely time for a status report.


mudtoe
Profile Pic
worryfree
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:27,241
Points:2,412,775
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: Oct 24, 2014 12:21:19 AM

It's all about weakening Hilary for 2016. NOTHING more or less.
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,368
Points:1,124,135
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2014 2:44:16 PM

hope we learn about benghazi
hillarybenghazi
Profile Pic
reb4
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:24,344
Points:2,427,800
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2014 8:24:08 AM

Uncle of Benghazi Victim: Will We Ever Learn?





As an Uncle, I would ask these same questions as well...
Here is the opening of the commentary from this Uncle:"Most news accounts of the attack on Benghazi say it cost the lives of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

My nephew Sean Smith was one of those other Americans.

It’s been a frustrating two years since Sean died serving his country on Sept. 11, 2012. There have been countless news reports, multiple congressional investigations and more than one set of recommendations that either should’ve been followed before the attacks or that should be addressed going forward.

But when it comes to definitive answers on what happened, how and why my nephew died that night, and what might be done to prevent such tragedies in the future, we’re still waiting and wondering and hurting and asking."
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,368
Points:1,124,135
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2014 12:04:52 PM

Looking for Benghazi hearings
benghazihillary
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 19, 2014 12:27:33 PM

"What is going on with the Benghazi hearing? I just did a search for updates, are they meeting just once a month or something?"

Whatever it takes to drag it out through multiple election cycles ;) <s>
Profile Pic
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:7,974
Points:1,544,395
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Oct 18, 2014 1:37:35 AM

Holder Decision on Benghazi Case Reverberates

10-17-14

from the NY Times . . .

"Less than 24 hours after the attack in Libya — and 21 months before the apprehension of a suspect, Ahmed Abu Khattala — Mr. Holder assigned the case to Mr. Machen’s office. The move was a surprise because nearly all major national security cases since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks had been steered to the United States attorneys’ offices in New York and Brooklyn, which have the most seasoned prosecutors in the country, and Northern Virginia, which is known for its government-leaning judges and jury pools.

In one sense, the jockeying was a reflection of the intense competition among prosecutors for any high-profile case that could help make a career, a competition that is fostered by Mr. Holder and his deputies in Washington who believe it sharpens even the most seasoned lawyers.
Mr. MacBride, who was the United States attorney in Northern Virginia at the time of the 9/11 attacks, said “hard-fought turf battles” for terrorism cases were not unusual.

“We all lost some cases to each other,” he said. “At the end of the day, we all liked and respected each other.”

But in this case, the decision to give the case to Mr. Machen’s office has left lingering concerns among some senior F.B.I. and Justice Department officials who worry that it was a mistake to entrust such a politically charged prosecution to an office with less experience than others in trying terrorists."
Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:16,030
Points:2,314,485
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Oct 17, 2014 11:49:08 PM

What is going on with the Benghazi hearing? I just did a search for updates, are they meeting just once a month or something?
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,368
Points:1,124,135
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 17, 2014 9:56:56 AM

benghazihillary
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 16, 2014 4:04:33 PM

"Weasel....life is the creation of God. God since I became a Christian, has never "sorely disappointed me".... I have never encountered anything that quite equals the beauty of life."

Not sure how you went into an abstract discussion regarding tangible points... good for you, I guess?
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:27,158
Points:1,848,985
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Oct 16, 2014 11:34:12 AM

Weasel....life is the creation of God. God since I became a Christian, has never "sorely disappointed me".... I have never encountered anything that quite equals the beauty of life.
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,368
Points:1,124,135
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 16, 2014 11:22:45 AM

hillary dosen't have straight answer--benghazihillary
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,368
Points:1,124,135
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 14, 2014 9:08:43 AM

Please no hillary!!
benghazihillary still alive for 2016
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 13, 2014 8:47:58 AM

"a. you forgot their families also"

So you assume...

"b. once again you assume you know man's motivation, I think that is best left to God and the truth, you are a chronic assumer."

Actually, I am student of history which shows this trend occurring over and over - Politicians rarely do anything without a benefit for themselves. Religion should have enlightened you on how easily man is corrupted.

"c. I, for one, will never be sorely disappointed for defending the cause of life, or those wrongly murdered, with no one to stand for them, and then those in power dishonoring by lying about their death. Shameful."

You will be, when you someday realize it was all a façade with the sole purpose of using it as political propaganda for countless election cycles to come - namely the 2016 POTUS election. Hopefully I'm wrong in this case, but I'm not holding my breath.
Profile Pic
jdhelm
Champion Author Iowa

Posts:16,079
Points:1,793,640
Joined:Dec 2009
Message Posted: Oct 13, 2014 7:33:51 AM

amen on the we don't need another organizer type in the wh, who's had little to no experience. she, just like obama, short term senator, he short stint as secy was nothing more than smoke and mirror type obama blunder.
Profile Pic
wbacon
Champion Author Philadelphia

Posts:16,052
Points:3,586,825
Joined:Jun 2004
Message Posted: Oct 13, 2014 6:54:03 AM

Hilary.... Please give some straight answers.....
Profile Pic
Cirdan
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:2,539
Points:139,585
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Oct 13, 2014 1:01:19 AM

There's a book out now - "13 hours in Benghazi" about what happened on the ground.
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,368
Points:1,124,135
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 12, 2014 11:34:53 AM

Gowdy will let it be known ---hillarybenghazi
Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:16,030
Points:2,314,485
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Oct 11, 2014 12:28:13 PM

Mudtoe: <<<"If that happens then Gowdy should subpoena him before the committee and ask him under oath and in front of the cameras: "Were you lying then, or are you lying now?"">>>

--That is indeed Gowdy's style, cutting to the chase without all the unnecessary BS.
Profile Pic
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:7,974
Points:1,544,395
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Oct 11, 2014 6:53:24 AM

Letter calls for urgent hearings with Panetta, others about Benghazi

10-10-14

'“In the conviction that every effort must be made to prevent further loss of life – or hostage-taking, destruction of American installations or other national humiliations – the signatories are calling for the Gowdy committee to convene hearings this month, “not weeks and weeks from now, ”Gaffney explained. “The purpose would be to take “the testimony under oath of Secretary Panetta and the other principals and key subordinates who have first-hand knowledge of the events that took place on the night of the 11th of September.”

Some of the signatories of the open letter include Andrew C. McCarthy, Chairman, Benghazi Accountability Coalition; Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., President & CEO, Center for Security Policy; Charles Woods, Father of Ty Woods, victim of 9/11/2012 terror attack in Benghazi; Clare Lopez, former CIA and Vice President, Center for Security Policy, and Allen B. West, Lieutenant Colonel, US Army (Retired).'
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:27,158
Points:1,848,985
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Oct 10, 2014 6:46:01 PM

Weasel..."Because they think that the hard right is fighting for them... understandable. They will be sorely disappointed once they are left behind."

a. you forgot their families also
b. once again you assume you know man's motivation, I think that is best left to God and the truth, you are a chronic assumer.
c. I, for one, will never be sorely disappointed for defending the cause of life, or those wrongly murdered, with no one to stand for them, and then those in power dishonoring by lying about their death. Shameful.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 10, 2014 1:34:47 PM

"And you couldn't be more wrong."

Because you say so, I know... LOL!
Profile Pic
mudtoe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:13,834
Points:1,875,805
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Oct 10, 2014 11:41:26 AM

mini: "My concern is that someone gets to him and he changes his tune before he is interviewed. "


If that happens then Gowdy should subpoena him before the committee and ask him under oath and in front of the cameras: "Were you lying then, or are you lying now?"


mudtoe
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,368
Points:1,124,135
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Oct 10, 2014 11:12:36 AM

hillarywillbebenghazi when she goes down!!!
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:27,158
Points:1,848,985
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Oct 10, 2014 10:15:03 AM

Lying also makes you look extremely stupid.
Profile Pic
reb4
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:24,344
Points:2,427,800
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Oct 10, 2014 8:39:41 AM

Mwyeant...
Scarey, the FBI Director did not have the resources at his disposal to find her number ????


Unbelievable...They didn't try very hard... obviously...


[Edited by: reb4 at 10/10/2014 8:41:02 AM EST]
Profile Pic
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:7,974
Points:1,544,395
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Oct 10, 2014 4:57:22 AM

Mom of Benghazi Hero Reveals Call She Got From FBI Director After Her Son’s Death: ‘You’re Going to Stick to That Little Story, Aren’t You?’

10-8-14

"Doherty also recalled a phone call she received from then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, which didn’t come until “well over a month” after her son died.

Mueller apologized for not calling her soon, claiming that he was unable to find her “contact number.”

“And I said, ‘Do you mean my phone number?’” Doherty recalled. “He said, ‘Contact number. We couldn’t find the contact number.”

“I said, ‘You’re the FBI.’ … So, then I sort of was laughing to myself and I said, ‘You’re going to stick to that little story, aren’t you?’”

"Several family members of the victims have been extremely critical of the Obama administration’s response."

America is better than this. The 4 murdered Americans are heroes because they died for our country. Attempts to minimize their service are unconscionable.

[Edited by: mweyant at 10/10/2014 4:59:18 AM EST]
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:12,250
Points:1,123,205
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 7:20:22 PM

mudtoe: "I sure hope that Gowdy has a very long interview with Panetta."

My concern is that someone gets to him and he changes his tune before he is interviewed. People are left wondering what happened to the person who spoke their mind so candidly 6 months earlier, but whose story is now completely different.
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:12,250
Points:1,123,205
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 7:14:49 PM

Weaslespit quoting me: "The problem with your misguided attacks is that the people who have truly suffered are looking forward to the Special Committee; they want to be heard."

Weaslespit: "Because they think that the hard right is fighting for them... understandable."

Yeah, those unfeeling, cold, hard right, evil people - how dare they not accept a whitewash and try to listen to the people whose stories don't match the conclusions. (rolling my eyes)

Weaslespit: "They will be sorely disappointed once they are left behind."

That already occurred. Do try and keep up.

Weaslespit quoting me: "You are welcome to provide some substance for your claim of "outright fraud" on the part of "Tea Partiers" - in relation to Benghazi, at anytime you wish."

Weaslespit: "The conclusions of dozens of investigations, including GOP-led hearings, is all of the proof that is needed.

Your hyperbole is slipping. Before it was "countless". Nevertheless, your inability to think logically is breathtaking. And you couldn't be more wrong.

That's not even close to being proof that the Special Committee is committing "outright fraud". Surely you cannot be that naïve. If you would like for me to present to you circumstances in the past where "dozens" of experts, juries, panels, grand juries, Congressional investigations, arrived at unanimous conclusions - and later it turned out they got it woefully wrong - just ask.

Weaslespit: "Unless you have an agenda that needs to be satisfied."

That is ironic. Because in my life, I have watched many people, who confidently, arrogantly made categorical, defamatory statements about others, because they had an agenda that they needed to be satisfied. And in the end, they lived to regret it.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 5:20:09 PM

"The problem with your misguided attacks is that the people who have truly suffered are looking forward to the Special Committee; they want to be heard."

Because they think that the hard right is fighting for them... understandable. They will be sorely disappointed once they are left behind.

"You are welcome to provide some substance for your claim of "outright fraud" on the part of "Tea Partiers" - in relation to Benghazi, at anytime you wish."

The conclusions of dozens of investigations, including GOP-led hearings, is all of the proof that is needed. Unless you have an agenda that needs to be satisfied.
Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:16,030
Points:2,314,485
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 3:07:11 PM

Now that somehow the witnesses have been allowed to speak, I can now see the sweat forming on the brows of some of our more liberal posters.
Profile Pic
mudtoe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:13,834
Points:1,875,805
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 1:52:00 PM

I sure hope that Gowdy has a very long interview with Panetta.


mudtoe
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:12,250
Points:1,123,205
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 9:20:31 AM

Weaslespit: "The only people whose character I have attacked in this topic are those of the politicians looking to gain a partisan edge on the backs of those who truly suffered loss in Benghazi."

The problem with your misguided attacks is that the people who have truly suffered are looking forward to the Special Committee; they want to be heard.

Weaslespit: "And send that message to the Tea Partiers as well who continue to try to manufacture any link possible in their attempts to gain political leverage through continued 'investigations' which clearly, Fox News already 'got to the bottom to' - in your opinion.

You are welcome to provide some substance for your claim of "outright fraud" on the part of "Tea Partiers" - in relation to Benghazi, at anytime you wish.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 8:24:17 AM

"You clearly don't give a rip about those who have truly suffered."

Clearly. <rolls eyes>

"If you're concerned about an 'appearance' of any credibility at all, you can stop making stuff up, and stop continuing to make this a partisan issue. Any time you want."

Back at ya! And send that message to the Tea Partiers as well who continue to try to manufacture any link possible in their attempts to gain political leverage through continued 'investigations' which clearly, Fox News already 'got to the bottom to' - in your opinion. <s>
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:12,250
Points:1,123,205
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 7:36:35 AM

Weaslespit quoting me: "You have attacked the character of people, and have given zero facts on which to base your attacks."

"Weaslespit: "Strange, it would appear that there are 'multiple' investigations that would indicate otherwise."

Not one of the "'multiple' investigations" to which you continue referring supports your allegations that the Tea Party Republicans are involved in any "outright fraud" because they want to hear from key individuals who seem to have been overlooked or discounted in the past.

Weaslespit: "The only people whose character I have attacked in this topic are those of the politicians looking to gain a partisan edge on the backs of those who truly suffered loss in Benghazi."

You clearly don't give a rip about those who have truly suffered. Otherwise you'd stop with your baseless attacks. Those who have truly suffered are looking forward to the Select Committee investigation.

If you're concerned about an 'appearance' of any credibility at all, you can stop making stuff up, and stop continuing to make this a partisan issue. Any time you want.

[Edited by: ministorage at 10/9/2014 7:38:28 AM EST]
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:25,454
Points:726,140
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Oct 8, 2014 11:50:06 AM



SAVMOR, " How can we believe anything out of this administrations mouths?"

Or out of the mouths of the Obama Worshipers right here on these GB boards!

Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:25,454
Points:726,140
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Oct 8, 2014 11:49:08 AM



AC302, "This means that the President lied to us..again."

So true.

It seems he cannot open his mouth without LYING.

SMH

Profile Pic
SAVMOR
Champion Author Idaho

Posts:6,949
Points:1,653,420
Joined:Jun 2005
Message Posted: Oct 8, 2014 10:22:51 AM

You are correct AC-302 - Leon Panetta and his team told Obama there was a terrorist attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi and the administration chose to blame it on a video and refused to call it a terrorist attack because we were in the middle of a presidential election and Obama did not want to impede his re-election. How can we believe anything out of this administrations mouths?

[Edited by: SAVMOR at 10/8/2014 10:23:46 AM EST]
Profile Pic
AC-302
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:31,144
Points:3,447,945
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Oct 8, 2014 9:59:47 AM

OK, so I saw where Panetta, talking to O'Reilly on FOX had mentioned that he really did use the words "attack" and "led by terrorists" to describe the assault on the compound in Benghazi. This means that the President lied to us..again.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 8, 2014 9:38:25 AM

"An echo chamber of like-minds chanting the same message is not a substitute for facts."

I couldn't have said it better myself... 'but what difference does it make'? ;)

"It is abundantly clear from which side the false outrage - and character assassination - is coming."

Again - couldn't have said it better myself.

"I am aware of your opinion on this topic. You have attacked the character of people, and have given zero facts on which to base your attacks."

Strange, it would appear that there are 'multiple' investigations that would indicate otherwise. But those don't count because they didn't give the answer that some want to hear - that Obama ordered the minimal assets in the area to 'stand down'... The only people whose character I have attacked in this topic are those of the politicians looking to gain a partisan edge on the backs of those who truly suffered loss in Benghazi.
Profile Pic
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:7,974
Points:1,544,395
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Oct 8, 2014 5:10:22 AM

Sneak peek: Mom of Benghazi victim Glen Doherty speaks out

10-7-14

Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:12,250
Points:1,123,205
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 7, 2014 10:52:49 AM

Weaslespit quoting me: "If they weren't being fraudulent in their claim that they were told to stand down, where is the fraud coming from?"

Weaslespit: "Is there a reason why you keep tying an unrelated point that your brought up to the opinion piece?"

That opinion piece confirms what you've been alleging. But you have failed to point out anything even close to "outright fraud". An echo chamber of like-minds chanting the same message is not a substitute for facts. There is either "outright fraud" or there isn't. One who alleges fraud should be able to point it out - especially if it is "outright fraud."
-----------------

Weaslespit: "I thought that would have been evident at this point."

It has been quite evident what you have been, and continue doing.
---------------------

Weaslespit quoting me: "It's an opinion piece in "The American Prospect", a D.C.-based, unabashedly liberal political magazine."

Weaslespit: "Correct. An opinion that I happen to agree with relative to the subject of the never-ending investigations into Benghazi in an attempt to find 'something' to nail Obama to the wall with - or if that fails, at least try to keep the false outrage relevant to aid in the elections."

After you acknowledged yesterday, that you don't believe the men in Benghazi were lying about their stand down orders, you still seem to want to claim that "Tea Party Republicans" are simply engaging in political "false outrage" just to "nail Obama". It is abundantly clear from which side the false outrage - and character assassination - is coming.

If you have some specific proof to back up your claim of "outright fraud" on the part of those who want to hear from Mark Geist, Kris Paronto, John Tiegen, Raymond Maxwell and others, please bring it.
-------------------

Weaslespit quoting me: "Empty character assassination isn't what I'd call a legitimate argument; it is akin to a house built on sand."

Weaslespit: "Interesting, given the character assassinations used by the Right against Obama (et al) are deemed perfectly acceptable (or at least to critiqued by yourself). Or is this another 'liberal-only' deficiency, as described by other GB posters in their own 'personal' character assassination attempts against fellow GB posters?"

Besides the fact that you are blatantly trying to change the subject away from what you are doing, the 'yabbut he did it too' defense is not a defense, and also a house built on sand.

I am aware of your opinion on this topic. You have attacked the character of people, and have given zero facts on which to base your attacks.

[Edited by: ministorage at 10/7/2014 10:56:31 AM EST]
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 7, 2014 10:14:27 AM

"If they weren't being fraudulent in their claim that they were told to stand down, where is the fraud coming from?"

Is there a reason why you keep tying an unrelated point that your brought up to the opinion piece? The fraud relates to the intentions of the politicians, not any specific testimony. I thought that would have been evident at this point.

"It's an opinion piece in "The American Prospect", a D.C.-based, unabashedly liberal political magazine."

Correct. An opinion that I happen to agree with relative to the subject of the never-ending investigations into Benghazi in an attempt to find 'something' to nail Obama to the wall with - or if that fails, at least try to keep the false outrage relevant to aid in the elections.

"Empty character assassination isn't what I'd call a legitimate argument; it is akin to a house built on sand."

Interesting, given the character assassinations used by the Right against Obama (et al) are deemed perfectly acceptable (or at least to critiqued by yourself). Or is this another 'liberal-only' deficiency, as described by other GB posters in their own 'personal' character assassination attempts against fellow GB posters?
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:12,250
Points:1,123,205
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 7, 2014 10:05:17 AM

Weaslespit quoting me: ""I asked you if you were referring to Mark Geist, Kris Paronto, John Tiegen, who provided excruciating details about being told to stand down. (I agree - their account indeed undermines what politicians in D.C. concluded.)"

Weaslespit: "No, I was not referring to them."

Their account undermines the "finding" of D.C. politicians. If they weren't being fraudulent in their claim that they were told to stand down, where is the fraud coming from?
---------------------

Weaselspit: "I think what I was referring to was quite clear; especially if the link was read."

It's an opinion piece in "The American Prospect", a D.C.-based, unabashedly liberal political magazine. From their About Us page: "We're liberal, progressive, lefty—call it what you want, we're proud of it." The article is chock-full of rhetoric and incendiary missives, like "kangaroo court", etc., but is devoid of facts. The writer smears anyone who has the intellectual curiosity to want to follow up on the CIA security accounts, on Ray Maxwell's account and other disconnects that the House Committee finding appears to have missed or ignored.

It confirms the rhetoric and character assassination you have been engaging in on this thread, but it does not provide anything - nothing to confirm or legitimize the claim of "outright fraud" on the part of those who are trying to piece together the massive disconnect between the finding of the House Committee and others in the trenches on of these issues - both on the ground that night in Benghazi, as well as back in Washington.

I agree with Rabin-Havt on one point: "What will Gowdy, Republican of South Carolina, discover that two years of investigations by his GOP colleagues could not? If the House leadership views the Intelligence Committee as that incompetent, shouldn’t its chairman be replaced?" Seems logical to me; if the House Intelligence Committee didn't do their job (or any other prior "investigation"), and did not thoroughly weigh all the facts, then I'd agree, the chairman should be replaced.
---------------------------

Weaslespit quoting me: "Were you referring to "Tea Party Republicans" (who would appear to be searching to see if the above accounts are true, which would indeed "undermine" the previous finding of establishment Republicans and Democrats?"

Weaslespit: "I do believe you have finally reached the point of the link I provided. If you still require additional clarification, I simply ask that you read it for yourself again."

I read the article, which is full of empty, incendiary rhetoric - the first time you posted it. I've read it twice again. The writer, and you, made the claim of "outright fraud", and both fail to provide any specifics to back up your flame throwing.

Thank you for acknowledging you had no facts on which to base your claim of "outright fraud," but were merely parroting an opinion expressed in a liberal writer's scathing editorial, whom you believe, but cannot elucidate anything specific. Empty character assassination isn't what I'd call a legitimate argument; it is a house built on sand.

[Edited by: ministorage at 10/7/2014 10:10:45 AM EST]
Profile Pic
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:16,030
Points:2,314,485
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Oct 6, 2014 1:15:43 PM

Weasel: <<<"You, along with most others here, are only looking for a scapegoat of your choosing - President Obama. The rest is just false outrage under the guise or patriotism and/or forced empathy.">>>

--You almost got my opinion right, let me rewrite your response so that you would be 100% right...

You, along with most others here, are only looking for accountability of the person(s) responsible for dereliction of duties and/or fraud. The rest is real outrage at the guise that this occurrence was properly adjudicated.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:16,481
Points:545,005
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Oct 6, 2014 11:59:44 AM

"knows everyone's motivation and heart."

Your motives are quite transparent... It doesn't take much to see through your propaganda.

Still waiting for an answer to this one, mexico;

maria>>> "have any of you ever noticed that weasel applies labels or name calling to folks when he does not have an educated reply."

Weaslespit>>> "Huh? I questioned your assertion that Christ calls for all Christians to be 'evangelists' (a point which you brought up) - how is that name calling?"

Is there a reason you have been avoiding this for nearly 4 weeks now?

[Edited by: Weaslespit at 10/6/2014 12:00:59 PM EST]
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:27,158
Points:1,848,985
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Oct 6, 2014 11:27:41 AM

Savmor, "Benghazi is now buried once again as the eola issue is the latest "cat in the tree" news topic along with the VA investigation, the AP, IRS and other scandals the Obama administration does not want to address. They hope all these will be gone and forgotten."

We could start a topic on the lost scandals of Obama, one scandal disappears as soon as the next scandal arrives. We live from scandal to scandel. What is going on with Bergdahal? We gave five terrorists for him. That will just go away, just like Benghazi. I want to know who Bob is, and who gave Bob the "stand down order". We will not forget.
Profile Pic
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:27,158
Points:1,848,985
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Oct 6, 2014 11:04:42 AM

One thing I have noticed about Weasle....he knows everyone's heart, he is above us all and knows everyone's motivation and heart. In fact he spends more time on these boards telling us about everyone else's heart or motivation ....reminds of a man I knew here long time ago....who suddenly left as his motivation wasn't so good in his own life..

What do they call folks who believe they know the motivation and mind of everyone?
Post a reply Back to Topics