Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    3:05 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: US politics > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: What about Benghazi? Back to Topics
mexicomaria
Champion Author
Minnesota

Posts:28,003
Points:2,029,840
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jul 16, 2013 9:19:29 PM

"There were 4 Americans murdered in Benghazi…and yes, it was terrorism. There were 4 Americans murdered at the Boston marathon…and yes, it was terrorism. I am glad the Administration put all the resources it did into finding the bombers in Boston – it was important. The Administration did exactly right in investigating in Boston (the jury is still out on what the Administration did or did not do before the bombing.) But why are our 4 murdered Americans in Benghazi not so important? I think they are." Greta Van Susteren

I still care.....what are we doing about the men we identified (???) that killed Americans in Benghazi?

REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,003
Points:2,029,840
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 30, 2015 12:11:31 AM

I still think Trey will be president some day. Very smart man, but slime is still slime.

"refused to relinquish her server to a neutral, detached third party for an independent review of potential public records:"...Now, does that just reek of something to hide. Smile like a Cheshire Cat Hillary, and tell a little joke and absolutely tons of the numb will rush to the pole to vote for you. They can't help themselves, just like you can't.

mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:8,683
Points:1,739,330
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Mar 29, 2015 7:42:41 PM

"In light of the Secretary’s unprecedented email arrangement with herself"

whoa

Representative Gowdy is quite the writer . . .
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,747
Points:2,543,800
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 29, 2015 6:39:49 PM

<<<"Washington, DC—Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy today issued the following statement regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s response to the committee’s subpoena. She failed to produce a single new document and refused to relinquish her server to a neutral, detached third party for an independent review of potential public records:

“After seeking and receiving a two week extension from the Committee, Secretary Clinton failed to provide a single new document to the subpoena issued by the Committee and refused to provide her private server to the Inspector General for the State Department or any other independent arbiter for analysis.

“We learned today, from her attorney, Secretary Clinton unilaterally decided to wipe her server clean and permanently delete all emails from her personal server. While it is not clear precisely when Secretary Clinton decided to permanently delete all emails from her server, it appears she made the decision after October 28, 2014, when the Department of State for the first time asked the Secretary to return her public record to the Department.

“Not only was the Secretary the sole arbiter of what was a public record, she also summarily decided to delete all emails from her server ensuring no one could check behind her analysis in the public interest.”

“In light of the Secretary’s unprecedented email arrangement with herself and her decision nearly two years after she left office to permanently delete all emails and because the equities at stake involve not only those of the Select Committee and Congress more broadly, but also those of the American people and their right to the full record of her tenure as secretary of State, we will work with the leadership of the House of Representatives as the Committee considers next steps. But it is clear Congress will need to speak with the former Secretary about her email arrangement and the decision to permanently delete those emails.”>>>

Statement Regarding Subpoena Compliance and Server Determination by Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

[Edited by: EZExit at 3/29/2015 6:41:34 PM EST]
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 29, 2015 5:49:40 PM

Hillarybenghazi
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 27, 2015 11:08:02 AM

hillarybenghazi
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:5,960
Points:1,640,950
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Mar 27, 2015 9:42:29 AM

Hillary "What does it matter now" Clinton
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 26, 2015 10:53:01 AM

hillarybenghazi
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 25, 2015 11:27:50 AM

hillarybenghazi
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:19,295
Points:622,945
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Mar 24, 2015 1:49:15 PM

"Rather then what was best for the country. It seems it was more important to monitor fallout rather then just tell the truth. Pretty consistent with this administrations entire time in office."

And that makes this Administration any different from past Administrations, how? Seems pretty consistent with politics - period.
airfresh
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:18,488
Points:1,026,495
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Mar 24, 2015 12:15:14 PM

<<<indicate that she and her advisers were closely monitoring the political fallout for the administration>>>

Rather then what was best for the country. It seems it was more important to monitor fallout rather then just tell the truth. Pretty consistent with this administrations entire time in office.

And those emails were sent back and forth on everyone's personal email accounts as well in order to avoid the full disclosure liability of using govt servers. Govt servers are public property. But by using personal accounts they were vulnerable to a level of electronic spying the govt servers are not.

Pretty bad all the way around.

[Edited by: airfresh at 3/24/2015 12:16:00 PM EST]
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 24, 2015 11:14:50 AM

hillarybenghazi
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:9,965
Points:1,850,355
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Mar 23, 2015 12:26:00 PM

Hundreds of the emails from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that were turned over to Congress regarding the Benghazi terrorist attack indicate that she and her advisers were closely monitoring the political fallout for the administration.Clinton Benghazi Emails Reveal How She Monitored Fallout
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 23, 2015 12:10:12 PM

Hillarybenghazi
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:24,190
Points:908,315
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Mar 23, 2015 8:57:42 AM

What a waste of taxpayer money. The investigations are nothing but a political gamble for the GOP.

Facts.

I still think the CIA and Amb. Stevens were operating outside the purview of the Administration in this case. That is the only thing that makes sense. Why was Stevens there when he was told not to go and did not have a strong security with him?

[Edited by: btc1 at 3/23/2015 8:59:48 AM EST]
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 22, 2015 3:34:35 PM

Hillarybenghazi
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:8,683
Points:1,739,330
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Mar 21, 2015 11:43:03 AM

Stewart? You mean Jon Stewart, the comedian?

For facts, I'd rather access meaningful resources, such as the following(sorry it is so long):

Benghazi Consulate Attack and Diplomatic Security

The Accountability Review Board has been tasked by both political party representatives to make changes that need to be made--this is a positive item that many seem to overlook.

The coverage of Hillary Clinton's emails/server is becoming more tabloid as the days go by. Had she given up her emails right away, when asked, perhaps the media would not have seen fit to cover, with no class, Hillary Clinton's email issues, and offer almost no coverage of the changes being made in the Accountability Review Board. IMHO, that is what the Benghazi dialogue (in the press) should be addressing--the ARB.

Do they really think they'll recover her emails? Right off the bat, when they saw she wasn't using government email, it should have been brought to light by the person(s) who are in charge of issuing the email accounts, especially if it became mandatory to USE government accounts for government business while this government worker was conducting business.

[Edited by: mweyant at 3/21/2015 11:48:38 AM EST]
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 21, 2015 11:27:24 AM

hillarybenghazi
BlkynB
Champion Author San Diego

Posts:27,357
Points:3,242,675
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 21, 2015 3:21:46 AM

Johnnyg1200. Just one problem with the scenario in your last paragraph.

Our government, controlled by Obama, and Eric Holder will not do a thing to force Hillary to give up her illegal (for what she used it for) private email server.

Now if we had an honest president and AG, well yes that would work.
johnnyg1200
Champion Author St. Louis

Posts:9,687
Points:1,468,155
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Mar 21, 2015 2:20:03 AM

I personally hope Hilary runs and wins the nomination. With Benghazi, her violation of the rules she insisted everyone else follow in regard to emails, and her funding from foreign countries hostile to the U.S. I think Mickey Mouse could beat her. And we haven't even gotten into the real campaign season yet. Democrats will bow down to her and build little shrines with candles and incense. But the independent voters will take some convincing.

By the way the government needs to stop all payments and benefits that come from the government until she either turns the server over or signs her departure documents that say she turned all communications over as required by law. It is with in the power of the government to do that and it has been done on the past to lower lever employees. Her rank and name should not protect her from the same standard as other government employees.
Passer
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:20,088
Points:2,346,510
Joined:Jan 2004
Message Posted: Mar 21, 2015 1:21:08 AM

"Stewart laid out Faux's dirty laundry."

Not only that but took the Fox to the woodshed, cut off its lying tale and gave it its biggest bare fur spanking in years. Yes, the fur flied and Fox will be hot to trot for weeks...
Cirdan
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:2,706
Points:143,445
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Mar 21, 2015 1:07:26 AM

Same old same old. The two of them should write a joint autobiography. They can title it "Cashing In."
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,003
Points:2,029,840
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2015 7:10:02 PM

Sorry, EZ, I believe Hillary and Bill's Foundation gifts will never be clear, her lies on Benghazi will never be clear, she can lie and connive and I have not met one Democrat on here (small sample of US voters) that called for Truth, and they are also spinning booing God in DNC.... Democrats do not care...they just do not care. I believe Hillary will come out smelling of horse pucky and she will run for Pres. and all Democrats here will say, "Hail, Hillary"....a good and honest woman.
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,245
Points:1,714,930
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2015 6:00:56 PM

I dont think this guy loves HRC
.
.
Watch the video and see if you agree or disagree.
wbacon
Champion Author Philadelphia

Posts:16,838
Points:3,792,980
Joined:Jun 2004
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2015 4:39:07 PM

what about BENGHAZI?
Cliffisher
Champion Author Wisconsin

Posts:31,366
Points:3,933,535
Joined:Sep 2003
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2015 12:33:53 PM

Stewart laid out Faux's dirty laundry.

Rotf
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:55,154
Points:1,448,755
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2015 12:08:05 PM

Jon Stewart blows it WIDE open:

The Daily Show Blasts Fox News' Double Standard In Ferguson And Benghazi Coverage


LOL, Indeed.
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,747
Points:2,543,800
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 19, 2015 1:40:42 PM

Even though Hillary's incompetence with Benghazi and subsequent coverup has been successfully washed away, I don't think that the email scandal and obvious abuse of position is cleanable. This still doesn't mean that the truth of all that transpired causing the Benghazi massacre should not be continued. The families of the loved ones as well as the American people deserve this, and demand this as well.
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,245
Points:1,714,930
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 19, 2015 1:32:55 PM

So she did it for her convenience and she put all of us at risk.
.
.
>>>Let's examine a few significant updates on the Hillary email scandal, starting with perhaps the most important -- but least covered -- aspect of the imbroglio: Unconscionable national security risks. In order to shield her communications from oversight and public information requests, Hillary Clinton chose to set up a private email server in her home, rather than use a secure official account. Regardless of the ethical propriety and legality of that decision (stay tuned on those points), intelligence experts believe her actions led to extraordinary breaches at the hands of foreign governments and outside entities.
.
.
Not only did Hillary's overwhelming impulse for secrecy and contempt for accountability put her own emails at risk -- bad enough, given her role as the country's top diplomat -- it also endangered the integrity of her contacts' communications. This is unforgivable. Myopia, paranoia, arrogance and reckless incompetence, all rolled into one set of astounding revelations. By the way, just a few days ago, the State Department shut down large parts of its email system due to malware placed by Russian hackers who somehow burrowed into the network. Do we know for a fact that Hillary's insanely insecure email scheme compromised State's broader system? No. Is it a distinct possibility, given everything we know? Absolutely. How many State Department, White House, and foreign officials' sensitive emails were put at risk, or penetrated? That may forever remain an open question, especially if Hillary maintains her obstinate refusal to turn over the server. Setting aside her disregard for national security and undermining of American foreign policy, is what Hillary did illegal? Law professor Ronald Rotunda reviews the facts of the case and concludes there's a good chance she violated the law:<<<

Her desire to hide and make sure no one (except foreign hackers) ever had access to her devious documents placed all of us at risk ----- AND HILLARY JUST DOESNT GIVE A FIG FOR ANY OF THAT.
.
.
.
.
What if Hillary just doesnt care?
.
.
>>>What if Hillary Clinton's emails were hacked by foreign agents when she was the secretary of state? What if persons claiming to have done so are boasting about their alleged feats on Internet websites and in chat rooms traditionally associated with illegal or undercover activities? What if this is the sore underbelly of an arrogant and lawless secretary of state who used her power to exempt herself from laws that govern executive branch employees and didn't care about national security?

What if the law required Clinton to swear under oath on her first day as secretary of state that she would comply with all laws governing the use of federal records? What if the principal governing law -- the Federal Records Act of 1950 -- makes it clear that when you work for the feds all the records you receive and generate belong to the government and you cannot lawfully conceal them from the government?

What if she refused to sign such a promise because she knew she'd be violating that law?

What if the State Department has an inspector general whose job it is to assure the public and the attorney general that the secretary of state is complying with federal law? What if agents of the inspector general signed documents swearing that Clinton told them she agreed to abide by the law, and so they permitted her to have access to federal records? What if they did this because Clinton refused to sign an oath herself since she had no intention of complying with it, and because she ordered them to sign in her place?

What if the law required Clinton to swear an oath at the time she left office that she had no federal records in her possession or control? What if she signed that oath knowing that nearly all of her records were in her possession and not the government's? What if she refused to sign that oath because she knew she possessed federal records contrary to law? What if she blamed her failure to sign that oath on her own inspector general? What if the law requires the inspector general to report her refusal to sign this oath to the attorney general? What if that report was made and the attorney general looked the other way?<<<
.
.
.
.
What is astounding is that people are seriously looking at this duplicitous lying untrustful person to be a valid contender for the office of President??????
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,003
Points:2,029,840
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 19, 2015 3:06:34 AM

She scratched Obama's back when she lied about Benghazi..now it is Quid Pro Quo. The Obama Adm will never stand up and help ....nothing new there...lying has come to be the art form of the Obama Adm. He does not want to truth in his memoirs, and there is much untruth in Hillary's past she does not want in her memoirs. Much for her daughter to be proud of...
Cirdan
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:2,706
Points:143,445
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Mar 19, 2015 1:10:46 AM

Nah, they just misspell it. Easy when you are translating from a language with a completely different alphabet.
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,747
Points:2,543,800
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 18, 2015 2:49:57 PM

I believe that Hillary probably directed that "Benghazi" was a code word for her daughter's wedding or yoga classes, so in that vein, any emails that had the word "Benghazi" in it were categorically deleted.

Just trying to think like a Clinton with a law degree...
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 18, 2015 11:37:16 AM

benghazihillary
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:9,965
Points:1,850,355
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Mar 17, 2015 11:51:13 AM

After giving just a few quick notes on the fiscal 2016 proposed budget, House Speaker John Boehner shifted to Benghazi and the recent controversy over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a private server and email system.

John Boehner's GOP Budget Presser Turned Into One About Benghazi
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 17, 2015 11:42:09 AM

hillarybenghazi is a lying woman!!
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:24,190
Points:908,315
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 3:06:44 PM

Daylliy! Will you please clean up your language! fly, does not like the use of such scatalogical words!
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:9,965
Points:1,850,355
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 2:24:22 PM

Nine months ago, when the Republican-controlled House of Representatives created the Select Committee on Benghazi, it looked as if the controversies surrounding the death of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens in Libya and Clinton’s role in the events were going to join the ranks of the political walking dead: a scandal to some, a manufactured crisis to others and — whichever it was — an issue that, because of Congress’ subpoena powers and investigative resources, would not die.

What Hillary Clinton’s email, Benghazi troubles have in common with the living dead
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,245
Points:1,714,930
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 1:26:20 PM

More Clinton sleaze numba two it seems. Their foundation cant keep accurate books. "Overhead" is too high and no one knows how much money is being siphoned off by Billary.... OK everybody act surprised now.....
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,245
Points:1,714,930
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 1:21:52 PM

Move along folks - nothing to see - just more Clinton sleaze
.
.
.>>>A Chinese conglomerate owned by a delegate to the Chinese parliament reportedly pledged millions to the Clinton Foundation, raising questions about whether the Chinese are once again trying to influence U.S. politics with donations to entities associated with the Clintons.
According a CBS report, Rilin Enterprises, which is owned by billionaire and parliament delegate Wang Wenliang, pledged $2 million to the foundation in 2013.
Rilin Enterprises was “one of the contractors that built the Chinese embassy in Washington,” and as author Jim Mann, an expert on the U.S.-China relationship, noted, the embassy contract shows how close Rilin Enterprises is to the Chinese government.
Mann told CBS that with “embassy construction, one of the most important tasks is making sure there are no bugs there… So you want to have the closest connection with the person or approval with the company.”
“If the point is you are not going to take money from foreign governments, then his construction company is as close to not just the Chinese government and as close to the Ministry of State Security as they could possibly be,” Mann added. “Indirectly the Clinton Foundation has political influence, that’s why people give to it. People give to the Clinton Foundation particularly because it is the Clintons and because they are prominent politicians in the United States.”<<<
.
.
.
I wonder if the regular whiners about 'rich fat cats" trying to buy elections etc will say anything about the latest edition of the Clintons being bought by foreign countries?
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,581
Points:3,244,735
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 12:40:16 PM

>>>Oh, now she's saying all the emails were read,...<<<
Yes, the HRC camp claims to have "read" all the 60,000 emails before deleting about half of them. The State Department, now in possessions of print-outs of the 30,000 or so turned over to it, says it will take weeks to read the 30,000.
Rush Limbaugh asks how her team could have accomplished a task twice the size as what faces the State Department so quickly......

Oh, wait......

With the emails provided as print-outs, that eliminates the use of electronic tool such as key word searches.
EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,747
Points:2,543,800
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 12:15:19 PM

Hillary would appear to be a professional liar. The story will keep morphing until it takes a form that the public will eat up.
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 11:48:10 AM

a bull speaker hillarybenghazi
teacher_tim
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:20,569
Points:863,325
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 6:08:04 AM

Oh, now she's saying all the emails were read, so there couldn't be ANYTHING that might incriminate her on Benghazi.

THAT might actually be believable!
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:8,683
Points:1,739,330
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 3:32:41 AM

January 27th hearing

Watch the hearing--it is mainly about how the Accountability Review Board(ARB) fell short through many administrations. The families of the Benghazi victims request that a tragedy like the one that happened to their family members never happens again. Both political sides agree on this. Rep. Cummings asked for an update in a couple of months after January 27th, and Rep. Gowdy asked for a progress report in about a year.

The fact that information is not forthcoming from the State Dept. is documented. It is almost a side show at this point.

To argue "old" points about Benghazi is kind of useless--focus on how the ARB is trying to improve itself now. Just my two cents . . .
Service66
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:27,026
Points:2,040,620
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Mar 16, 2015 2:52:14 AM


So Elijah Cummings said Sunday that there are questions about Banghazi still unanswered, and that there is reason to continue the inquiry.

Given that Cummings has been firmly planted in the "this is a witch hunt" camp since the beginning, one has to suppose that he's gotten the word that teeing off on Hillary has been approved.

There's no reason to believe that he has had a come-to-Jesus moment and is speaking honorably.

Passer
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:20,088
Points:2,346,510
Joined:Jan 2004
Message Posted: Mar 15, 2015 11:37:21 PM

"hillarybenghazi is to be pitted!!"

Speaking of BULL!





<ROTFL>





[Edited by: Passer at 3/15/2015 11:37:43 PM EST]
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:2,637
Points:1,305,250
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Mar 15, 2015 4:53:48 PM

hillarybenghazi is to be pitted!!
PopcornPirate
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:5,960
Points:1,640,950
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Mar 13, 2015 9:12:30 AM

Keep asking for the missing e-mails.
Keep the pressure on her to release them.
If not then she will attempt to get away with more lies
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:28,504
Points:883,055
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Mar 11, 2015 7:28:51 AM



flyboy, Hillary will never change, will she?

She is just corrupt and dishonest to the core.

AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:28,504
Points:883,055
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Mar 11, 2015 7:26:35 AM



nstrdnvstr, "Are the emails about Benghazi still missing?"

Nahhhhh.

The only thing Hillary deleted were personal emails about her mother's funeral and yoga and the ones with Bill! 33,000 of them! That musta been some funeral. That musta been some yoga.

ROTFL

You know, the TWO emails that Bill says he ever sent in his LIFETIME to anyone BUT Hillary.

So I am sure the were NO Benghazi emails that Hillary deleted.

ROTFL

nstrdnvstr
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:41,868
Points:4,790,135
Joined:May 2001
Message Posted: Mar 11, 2015 6:12:03 AM

Are the emails about Benghazi still missing?
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,245
Points:1,714,930
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 10, 2015 11:41:57 AM

The secretive old bag in the closet has a lifetime history of lies and secrecy. Does anyone in their right mind think she will ever change? Can anyone ever trust anything she says?
.
.

Read teh entire article - I didnt post excerpts as the whole article should be read to grasp the ideas expressed.

The primary idea is that Hillary has a lifetime history of lies, deceit, secrecy and obfuscation of investigations. If anyone in their right mind thinks she would be any different as president they are smoking some of obama's weed in the choommobile.
Post a reply Back to Topics