Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    8:26 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: US politics > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Meet McConnell's opponent. Back to Topics
btc1

Champion Author
Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jul 1, 2013 3:17:12 PM

Allison Lundergan Grimes is running.

Who is Allison Lundergan Grimes?

A formidable opponent. With big connections to the National Democratic Party and the Clintons.
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2014 8:33:06 PM

The far right wing from outside Kentucky has spoken. Remember this therder. They will never claim it when McConnell is no longer our Senator after Novemeber.
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:1,889
Points:876,980
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2014 7:46:53 PM

No chance of anyone beating McConnell
Profile Pic
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:25,848
Points:1,259,475
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2014 11:32:38 AM

I seem to remember btc also saying similar things before Rand Paul whupped the opposition. snicker smile.....
Profile Pic
therder
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:2,423
Points:1,923,620
Joined:Feb 2007
Message Posted: Feb 8, 2014 10:52:19 AM

A new Bluegrass Poll – conducted for WKYT-TV, the Lexington Herald-Leader, the Louisville Courier-Journal, and WHAS-TV – found Grimes leading McConnell among registered Kentucky voters. Results show Grimes would win 46 percent of the vote compared to 42 percent for McConnell if the two face off against each other in the November general election. Former President Bill Clinton is planning a trip to Kentucky later this month to campaign for Grimes. She said Friday that the former president will campaign with her in Louisville on Feb. 25. She says Clinton has indicated he wants to make the Kentucky Senate race his top priority this year. Clinton is the last Democrat to carry Kentucky in a presidential election.

McConnell is in trouble. He's going to need every cent of that campaign war chest he's built up. It's no surprise that Bill Clinton is coming here. President Obama, on the other hand, probably won't even fly over Kentucky's airspace if the Grimes campaign has anything to do with it.

[Edited by: therder at 2/8/2014 10:51:38 AM EST]
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jan 17, 2014 9:32:54 AM

So SE3.5, you are telling me that there are 3 more Republicans worth MORE than 20 M in deciding our government actions?!!! WOW! JUST WOW! We know they only support what is good for large business so MAN! What a ripoff we are getting....

Well hopefully we will get rid of Mitch and more of them out of there this year!
Profile Pic
SE3.5
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:20,395
Points:3,494,715
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jan 17, 2014 8:53:24 AM

"He is the wealthiest"

Wrong again. According to ABC News, seven of the ten wealthiest are democrats, and Mitch is not one of the three republicans in the top ten.

As I said earlier, "I am not planning on moving to KY", so I will bid this topic adieu.
Profile Pic
SE3.5
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:20,395
Points:3,494,715
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jan 17, 2014 8:46:58 AM

"Mitch McConnell is not in the presidential order of succession."

Although my post had a question mark at the end, it was not really a question, but thanks for posting the answer anyway.
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jan 17, 2014 8:07:04 AM

I am sorry. I had been listening to Fox News. Of course he is not the highest ranking elected Republican. He is the wealthiest. Counting contributions and all. Bought and paid for.
Profile Pic
therder
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:2,423
Points:1,923,620
Joined:Feb 2007
Message Posted: Jan 16, 2014 8:31:51 PM

Mitch McConnell is not in the presidential order of succession. The only senator who can be is the senate president pro tem.
Profile Pic
SE3.5
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:20,395
Points:3,494,715
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jan 16, 2014 7:24:28 PM

"he IS the highest ranking elected Republican"

Really? Where does he stand in the presidential succession chart?
Profile Pic
therder
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:2,423
Points:1,923,620
Joined:Feb 2007
Message Posted: Jan 16, 2014 5:05:55 PM

Matt Bevin is starting to raise significant money for his primary challenge against McConnell. I don't think he can beat McConnell but might make him spend a lot in the primary. Grimes recently accused McConnell of "laughing about the unemployed". It will take more than mocking McConnell to beat him. This will be a very dirty campaign on both sides. I will be very surprised if Bill Clinton doesn't come to Kentucky and campaign for her.
Profile Pic
SE3.5
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:20,395
Points:3,494,715
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jan 16, 2014 4:11:50 PM

"That WOULD change your Republican Party."

My Republican party?
Profile Pic
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:71,351
Points:2,762,495
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Jan 16, 2014 3:26:17 PM

B, I have to disagree with your assessment of McConnell's ranking.

Boehner is Speaker of the Horse, a position usually seen as being third-most powerful position in US government. That's because the R's control the Horse and are the minority in the Senate.

Even if the R's controlled the Senate, the Senate Majority Leader is not seen as powerful of a position as Speaker of the Mouth.

[Edited by: I75at7AM at 1/16/2014 3:30:41 PM EST]
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jan 16, 2014 2:14:00 PM

SE3.5, ""Meet McConnell's opponent."

Why? I am not planning on moving to KY." Well he IS the highest ranking elected Republican, right now, in the US. He is now facing the toughest fight of his political life. It does look like he could be defeated in November. That WOULD change your Republican Party. So yeah, you will be affected.

daylilly, you are welcome to post your diatribes here in the topics. But, why do you insist putting your blabber on my album pics? Please, I am asking you nicely again, do not do that.

[Edited by: btc1 at 1/16/2014 2:14:01 PM EST]
Profile Pic
daylily2009
Champion Author Fayetteville

Posts:1,889
Points:876,980
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Jan 16, 2014 11:15:09 AM

Why would democrats want to defeat one of their supporters??
Profile Pic
SE3.5
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:20,395
Points:3,494,715
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jan 15, 2014 9:58:16 AM

"Meet McConnell's opponent."

Why? I am not planning on moving to KY.
Profile Pic
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:71,351
Points:2,762,495
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Jan 15, 2014 9:55:42 AM

Meet Matt Bevin in this radio interview. Note: Podcasts are maintained for about a week, maybe two.
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Dec 4, 2013 11:17:03 AM

LOL!
Profile Pic
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:71,351
Points:2,762,495
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Dec 4, 2013 10:00:10 AM

Okay, b, it's good to have an inside source. Let us know if any really juicy tidbits come out of the soup during this campaign!

My post was largely tongue-in-cheek, I just saw an article with her name on it and I didn't want this valuable thread to fall into disuse.

It seems this campaign is really heating up now! Ol' Mitch has already launched several broadsides against her. Tell McConnell, if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen! And tell Mitch that there is a rocking chair on the front porch with his name on it, for his retirement years.

[Edited by: I75at7AM at 12/4/2013 9:59:42 AM EST]
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Dec 4, 2013 9:44:05 AM

I75, be certain whom you are addressing when you bring this subject up. I was the managing Chef for her family's catering service for 6 years. Yeah, what she selected to share was close to what can be found on line but so are a lot of families favorites. This is just a really dumb argument. What she provided were recipes I know were used in the catering business or very, very close.

So scrap this one. I am the source so no link needed.
Profile Pic
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:71,351
Points:2,762,495
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Dec 4, 2013 8:54:25 AM

B, your candidate was in the news again. Alison Lundergan Grimes Stole Her Family’s ‘Favorite Recipes’

Of course, taking a recipe from the internet and calling it your own doesn't weigh like quoting some obscure academic passage when you're a Senator from Kentucky, now, does it? And perhaps whoever first posted those recipes online got them first from the Grimes family anyway. Maybe they're cousins? Anyhow, are recipes copyrightable material?
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Oct 26, 2013 8:29:52 AM

AC, all I did was recognize your comment. Have a good day, AC. You need one.
Profile Pic
Panama19
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:29,243
Points:2,871,635
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Oct 26, 2013 4:17:20 AM


streetrider, "as an independent that has voted for people of both parties, mitch did not surrender ... There is no way to get back our world standing after defaulting, unless the goal is to go to a new global currency"

If your credit card balance equaled your income and your spending was 1.5 times your gross income and your credit card was maxed out and the bank refused to increase your borrowing limit unless you got your spending under control - would your bankruptcy be due to your profligate spending or the bank's refusal to continue to support it?

The shutdown came because the Obama administration refused to address its spending and the House demanded spending cuts as a condition of raising the borrowing limit.

You may choose to blame the GOP for the shutdown, but in truth they were the only adults at the table. And Mitch did indeed surrender rather than insist on a return to fiscal responsibility.

And a default would indeed be a serious thing for our economy, but it is the overspending that would have caused it - not fiscal restraint.

"The longer the private sector takes to recover jobs, the longer the GOP brand is tarnished"

The more the administration increases taxing and spending the less able the private sector is to recover. Government taxing, borrowing, and spending without restraint takes resources away that industry needs to expand and grow their businesses.

It is the Democrats that have caused the sluggish recovery from the most recent recession - just as they did during the Great Depression.

"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong … somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises. … I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started. … And an enormous debt to boot."
- Henry Morgenthau, Jr. - U.S. Secretary of the Treasury during the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt.

The Employment-Population Ratio of those aged 16 and over shows the persistent unemployment rate today in contrast to the sharp recovery during and after the Reagan administration's cuts in taxes and spending.

"There is no way to get back our world standing after defaulting, unless the goal is to go to a new global currency"

There is no way to get back our world standing after this administration has destroyed the value of our currency by creating money out of thin air, and the world is already searching for a replacement for the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency because we are debasing our currency so rapidly.

The progressive model does not work and it leads everyone that tries it to ruin.

If McConnell isn't up to the fight he needs to be replaced with someone that is.


[Edited by: Panama19 at 10/26/2013 4:21:10 AM EST]
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:10,782
Points:945,590
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 25, 2013 11:03:17 PM

btc1 didn't bump this topic.
Profile Pic
AC-302
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:29,002
Points:3,204,210
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Oct 25, 2013 8:51:42 PM

You had to bump your own topic to get it noticed? Well, good luck with your thinning hair and your worn out topic...
Profile Pic
streetrider
Champion Author Gary

Posts:10,239
Points:149,355
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2013 7:50:02 AM

Panama19

as an independent that has voted for people of both parties, mitch did not surrender.

He may have realized the country is more important than party ideology.

There is no way to get back our world standing after defaulting, unless the goal is to go to a new global currency.

If shrinking the government, and curbing spending is the true goal of the Tea party then they need to take another approach. Not raising the ceiling is not the answer.

Growing private sector jobs that reward better than government jobs would go a long way, especially since the government ranks on top as the number one employee.
Holding the economy ransom is not helping them either. The longer the private sector takes to recover jobs, the longer the GOP brand is tarnished.Maybe the Tea Party should break loose of the GOP there is always room for a third or fourth party.

Just my two cents, the bottom line is Mitch did the best he could for the folks he represents.
Profile Pic
Panama19
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:29,243
Points:2,871,635
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2013 12:26:33 AM


streetrider, "What is the real gain to unseat him?"

Same as getting rid of Specter. Whenever his support was crucial on an important issue he voted with the Democrats.

Might as well have a Democrat in office as a GOP politician that is addicted to surrender whenever there is a fight.

The result is the same either way.

Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:10,782
Points:945,590
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 9:36:51 AM

btc1: "Thin is how the Tea Party is wearing."

That's your hope. The fact that libs are constantly bringing up the Tea Party shows they actually fear the Tea Parties will get in the way of their BIG government agendas. (And I would agree, they are wearing thin on the supporters of massive government expansion.)

streetrider: "It is always hard to unseat an incumbent, Mitch brought home the bacon for his area. ....What is the real gain to unseat him?"

Sage observation. There is no gain, for Kentucky. If McConnell had been a Democrat, the Democrats would be touting all the pork he brought home over the past three decades--about how good he'd been for Kentucky. Instead, they just want him gone at all costs--because they want a Democrat in that seat. Period.

If Allison Lundergan, whom btc1 swore he would never vote for a Lundergan, in the Ashley Judd thread (because apples don't fall far from the tree), became the next Kentucky Senator, the Junior Senator would have far less clout, yet would be expected to keep bringing it home for the Commonwealth of Kentucky. It's a non sequitur to be reading Democrats railing against someone who keeps bringing home exactly what they want and expect.

Whether I agree with the way D.C. operates or not, that IS the system we have now. The best thing for Kentucky is for Mitch McConnell to have another 6 years before retiring (even lots of KY Democrats know that) leaving a scandal-free record of serving the Commonwealth behind him.

[Edited by: ministorage at 10/22/2013 9:45:10 AM EST]
Profile Pic
streetrider
Champion Author Gary

Posts:10,239
Points:149,355
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 8:14:00 AM

It is always hard to unseat an incumbent, Mitch brought home the bacon for his area.

Not frugal, but a very smart man.

What is the real gain to unseat him?
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 6:57:21 AM

.

[Edited by: btc1 at 10/22/2013 6:58:44 AM EST]
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 12:57:48 AM

Thin is how the Tea Party is wearing, AC.

Like the hair on my head!

[Edited by: btc1 at 10/22/2013 12:58:27 AM EST]
Profile Pic
e_jeepin
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:4,485
Points:134,770
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 12:45:33 AM

"With big connections to the National Democratic Party and the Clintons."

LOL -- a Clinton connection will almost guarantee you a loss unless they throw TONS of money at you.

Kentucky and Virginia is where the entire DNC budget will be poured in.
Profile Pic
Panama19
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:29,243
Points:2,871,635
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 12:31:25 AM


AC-302, "Guys, don't you think this topic is wearing a bit thin?"

No.

As long as people have something to say it serves its purpose.

You don't have to click on it if it bores you.

Profile Pic
Panama19
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:29,243
Points:2,871,635
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 12:29:23 AM


gocatgo, "Mitch's biggest problem with the Tp zealots is that he listened to the majority of Americans that were against the govt shutdown"

It wasn't the Tea Party that shut down the government - it was the Dems an Obama that refused to negotiate and who triggered the shutdown.

The GOP offered to fund everything except Obamacare, then everything and delay the individual mandate for a year until it was ready, then everything one department at a time (as is the normal procedure), and finally to fund everything and make congress and the administration live by the same rules they want us to obey.

The Dems offered only a choice between capitulation and government shutdown.

Only the blind ideologues blame the GOP for the shutdown.

Profile Pic
AC-302
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:29,002
Points:3,204,210
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Oct 22, 2013 12:16:40 AM

Guys, don't you think this topic is wearing a bit thin?
Profile Pic
gocatgo
Champion Author South Carolina

Posts:17,996
Points:2,858,780
Joined:Apr 2006
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2013 10:09:17 AM

Mitch's biggest problem with the Tp zealots is that he listened to the majority of Americans that were against the govt shutdown. The Tp is perfectly content to go off the cliff to appease a 30% con zealot minority and Mitch was not.
Profile Pic
jeskibuff
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:9,651
Points:1,769,435
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Oct 21, 2013 6:18:40 AM

daylily2009 said: "Obama should run in Kentucky!!!!"

You spelled "Kenya" wrong! ;)
Profile Pic
Panama19
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:29,243
Points:2,871,635
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Oct 20, 2013 9:35:06 PM


therder, "It would be ironic if McConnell isn't there"

It doesn't look too good for him now.

After he threw away the only leverage the GOP had in the recent budget and credit limit battles he has lost the Tea Party conservatives.

With the GOP split, Grimes has a better path to victory than either of the GOP contenders.

For conservatives it doesn't make a great difference whether the Democrats win outright or the GOP surrenders rather than fighting to the end.

The result is the same either way.

Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Oct 20, 2013 12:47:35 PM

Gocatgo, I would not call Matt Bevins a "hack". I do not think he has that much political experience. I would like to see him as Alison's opponent next fall, however! ;-)

Old Mitch, thinks he has the primary aced. We will see! It may be easier for Alison to beat McConnell in his own primary than in the main event in the fall!

Either way, as long as Mitch is ditched, I will be happy!

[Edited by: btc1 at 10/20/2013 12:48:20 PM EST]
Profile Pic
gocatgo
Champion Author South Carolina

Posts:17,996
Points:2,858,780
Joined:Apr 2006
Message Posted: Oct 20, 2013 11:23:05 AM

McConnell's first opponent will be from his own party from an unknown hack in the T party where he will be seen as a sellout to libs. If the fight within his own party does not get him McConnell will have an uphill fight with Grimes. Mitch has his work cut out for him.

The bottom line is that the Gop needs to get their act together and grow a pair and I ain't talking about eyes and ears.
Profile Pic
KansasGunman
Champion Author Kansas

Posts:21,872
Points:2,113,455
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: Oct 20, 2013 11:04:18 AM

"btc1, your desire to change horses is because you want a Democrat--period. You hate Mitch McConnell for what he is, not for anything he's done."

.....

Hey it's got to be rough living in a State being a Democrat where your vote pretty much doesn't count squat and surrounded by Conservatives...being that 60% of KY voted for Romney last year.

Wishful thinking it would seem.
Profile Pic
therder
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:2,423
Points:1,923,620
Joined:Feb 2007
Message Posted: Oct 20, 2013 10:37:20 AM

I just watched Matt Bevin interviewed by Bill Bryant on KYNEWSMAKERS. He has a steep road to climb to beat McConnell in the primary election. He's not been able to raise enough to be competitive. If Sarah Palin gets involved on his behalf that would probably change.

Interesting side note: In every photo I've seen of McConnell in the media he looks like he's worried to death. It's a terrible impression.
Profile Pic
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:71,351
Points:2,762,495
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2013 2:14:18 PM

Yes, the irony would be flattening. Rand Paul might get steamed, if pressed on the issue!
Profile Pic
therder
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:2,423
Points:1,923,620
Joined:Feb 2007
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2013 1:34:31 PM

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell's re-election campaign manager said in a taped telephone conversation earlier this year he was "sorta holding my nose" while doing the job. I doubt he would have taken the job unless former boss Rand Paul told him to or allowed him to. I wonder how the tea party and Bevin's campaign feels about Rand Paul now given his continued endorsement of McConnell. Rand Paul had to endorse McConnell because Paul will need McConnell's help in 2016. It would be ironic if McConnell isn't there.
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:10,782
Points:945,590
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Jul 24, 2013 9:29:58 PM

btc1: "There seems to be another opposition candidate to announce this afternoon. A Tea Party Candidate. mini, will you support your man or McConnell?"

Your first problem is always trying to pigeonhole me.

It would please you nothing more than to have a limited government candidate run against Lundergan Grimes. McConnell is more conservative than moderates like McCain, and has served the Commonwealth well. I lean toward waiting for him to retire.

btc1, your desire to change horses is because you want a Democrat--period. You hate Mitch McConnell for what he is, not for anything he's done. His tenure has been scandal free, and he has been good for Kentucky. You want to stack the Congress with Democrats. You hate McConnell's power because you want it for YOUR party. Period. If McConnell is tough as nails in politics, it's pure evil. But if a Democrat does it, it's the game of politics and all is fair. You're glad when it's Democrats with the power.

You've never badmouthed Dingy Harry's power or low-stooping political campaigns from the left. I personally witnessed the depths to which you would stoop during the 2010 election. Whatever it takes.

You're very transparent.

[Edited by: ministorage at 7/24/2013 9:38:10 PM EST]
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jul 24, 2013 1:49:42 PM

There seems to be another opposition candidate to announce this afternoon.
A Tea Party Candidate. mini, will you support your man or McConnell?

And there is this,

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) campaign supporters reportedly attempted to coerce Matt Bevin (R) into not mounting a primary challenge against the senator, the National Review reported Tuesday.

According to the report, McConnell allies pressed Bevin to stay out of the 2014 race, allegedly offering the Kentucky businessman "political prizes" if he agreed to not run.

The National Review's Katrina Trinko reports:

“Mitch McConnell’s people reached out to Matt for several months through all different avenues trying to convince him not to run,” the adviser close to Bevin tells National Review Online. “They can pretend like they’re not afraid, they can call him a nuisance, but they were desperate not to have him. Because they are scared.”

“First they tried to threaten him,” the source added, “and then they tried to dangle shiny political prizes.”

McConnell campaign manager Jesse Benton dismissed the claim, saying that “Nobody from the McConnell campaign or office has ever had a conversation with Matt Bevin about this campaign.”

McConnell is scared says Bevin. Is there a chance McConnell will not be running at all, in the general election of 2014?

McConnell's threats.

The key with the Bacon, mini, is where is it in the last eight years from McConnell? Very little, especially with the power he has had!


[Edited by: btc1 at 7/24/2013 1:51:57 PM EST]
Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:10,782
Points:945,590
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Jul 24, 2013 7:55:38 AM

btc1: "mini, the difference is, we, here in Kentucky cannot vote Reid out."

You're not only a master of the obvious, but a master of evading reality.

Your post below implied Senator McConnell "sold [our interests] to the highest bidder." You won't find me supporting the bank bailout--which may have been the biggest money laundering scheme the world has ever known--but must I really remind you that almost everyone in Congress voted for it, on both sides of the aisle?

McConnell has brought Kentucky's interests home to Kentucky many times. Kentuckians wouldn't have continued to vote for him this long if he hadn't. Senior Senators are usually better at bringing home the bacon than are junior senators. (Whether I agree with that or not is inconsequential. What IS consequential to the people of Kentucky is WHICH candidate would better equipped to do that.) Reality goes against the message you were selling--that is IF you are really concerned for the people of Kentucky.

And lobbying interests don't vanish when a Senior senator leaves. I cannot believe you're that naïve. If Lundergan Grimes were to take a Democrat seat in the Senate, the same lobbyists who have filled Harry Reid's coffers will beating a path to her new Senate door at the Russell Office Building. And you *know* that.

So, thanks for your effort to demagogue McConnell for what he's received from the banking interests--which from the link you provided shows us Democrat Leader Harry Reid raised over a quarter-million dollars more than McConnell from the financial sector (and 8 million dollars more than McConnell in toto).

Nice try at demagoguery. It failed. But nice try.

[Edited by: ministorage at 7/24/2013 8:05:43 AM EST]
Profile Pic
btc1
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:20,413
Points:841,370
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jul 24, 2013 3:40:37 AM

mini, the difference is, we, here in Kentucky cannot vote Reid out. We can get rid of our culprit.

Paul is playing "kissy face" with both sides. Carpetbagging Mugwamp.
Profile Pic
Panama19
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:29,243
Points:2,871,635
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Jul 24, 2013 2:22:04 AM


therder, "Did Rand Paul ever formally endorse McConnell? I'm anxious to hear Paul's comments now that it looks like McConnell will have a contested primary"

Louisville businessman Matt Bevin to announce plans for U.S. Senate primary race against Mitch McConnell

"U.S. Rand Paul, who won election in 2010 with support from the tea party, said Monday that he continues to endorse McConnell’s re-election but would not urge Bevin to get out of the race. Paul had earlier discouraged the tea party from challenging McConnell"

Profile Pic
ministorage
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:10,782
Points:945,590
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Jul 23, 2013 8:07:30 PM

btc1, thanks for the link. I went to the website from the data URL in your link below to get some perspective and to compare our two Senate leaders.

Democrat Harry Reid received over a quarter-million dollars MORE monies from securities and investment firms than McConnell during the same period. In each category, Harry Reid out-recieved monies from campaign contributors. I've listed the biggest porker in each category first.

Harry Reid Cycle Fundraising, 2009 - 2014, Campaign Cmte
Raised: $21,744,375
Spent: $23,868,646
Cash on Hand: $1,092,332
Debts: $0
Last Report: Sunday, June 30, 2013

Mitch McConnell Cycle Fundraising, 2009 - 2014, Campaign Cmte
Raised: $13,749,003
Spent: $4,009,648
Cash on Hand: $9,577,329
Debts: $0
Last Report: Sunday, June 30, 2013

--Reid outraised McConnell by a factor of 11 to 7
--Reid outspent McConnell by a factor of 6 to 1

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contributors to Harry Reid
Top 5 Industries, 2009-2014, Campaign Cmte
Industry Total Indivs PACs
Lawyers/Law Firms $3,503,731 $3,207,285 $296,446
**Securities & Investment $1,109,632 $981,632 $128,000
Lobbyists $950,508 $929,338 $21,170
Real Estate $718,527 $633,351 $85,176
Retired $702,503 $702,503 $0

Contributors to Mitch McConnell
Top 5 Industries, 2009-2014, Campaign Cmte
Industry Total Indivs PACs
**Securities & Investment $786,709 $672,209 $114,500
Retired $536,367 $536,367 $0
Oil & Gas $488,600 $318,100 $170,500
Insurance $450,175 $247,675 $202,500
Lobbyists $370,725 $358,714 $12,011

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top 5 Contributions

Harry Reid Top 5 Contributors, 2009-2014, Campaign Cmte
Contributor Total Indivs PACs
Weitz & Luxenberg $112,850 $112,850 $0
Simmons Cooper LLC $107,600 $107,600 $0
Girardi & Keese $81,600 $81,600 $0
Baron & Budd $71,600 $71,600 $0
Morgan & Morgan $63,150 $63,150 $0

Mitch McConnell Top 5 Contributors, 2009-2014, Campaign Cmte
Contributor Total Indivs PACs
Citigroup Inc $84,100 $74,100 $10,000
Kindred Healthcare $76,050 $66,050 $10,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co $61,000 $55,000 $6,000
Capital One Financial $54,500 $44,500 $10,000
NorPAC $53,250 $53,250 $0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ahh, persective.

;-P

[Edited by: ministorage at 7/23/2013 8:15:42 PM EST]
Post a reply Back to Topics