Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    9:09 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: US politics > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Hilliary Clinton ....keep your eye on the bouncing ball. Back to Topics
mexicomaria
Champion Author
Minnesota

Posts:28,006
Points:2,031,900
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jun 12, 2013 1:15:50 AM

There is enough coming out about Hilliary's watch at the State Dept. to keep us busy for awhile....

CBS..State Department memo reveals possible cover-ups, halted investigations
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,634
Points:3,247,285
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2015 8:15:11 AM

SGM, there aren't really any dem issues or gop issues. They are all the nation's issues.
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,006
Points:2,031,900
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 20, 2015 6:32:55 AM

Hillary Clinton's money problems keep getting worse...Despite Hillary Clinton promise, charity did not disclose donors.

Cite. So typical of the Clintons....sneakiness and lying .
airfresh
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:18,492
Points:1,026,575
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Mar 14, 2015 12:29:06 PM

Her awful press conference on her email controversy shows how weak she is when she isn't being fawned over by her supporters. If no one runs against her she won't get the grilling she's going to get in the real campaign. A primary prepares you for what's to come. She'll be like a dear in the headlights once the slings and arrows start coming.

Like service said... how'd she do in 08 against a nobody from nowhere with no experience for the job. He took it right away from her. Watching her press conference was painful even for me.It will only be worse during a presidential campaign. She's not the mascot of the media Obama was.

The fake Indian from Massachusetts on the other hand would get royal mascot treatment. She's one of their own. Hillary is too she just tries to hide the fact. The media doesn't like it when someone isn't proud enough of the brotherhood to wear it openly.

[Edited by: airfresh at 3/14/2015 12:31:33 PM EST]
Service66
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:27,050
Points:2,040,760
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Mar 14, 2015 10:34:02 AM


Well, Hillary was inevitable in 2008...how'd that work out?

Seems inevitable this time around has already turned to vulnerable.

sgm4law
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:24,249
Points:3,206,595
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Mar 14, 2015 8:30:10 AM

"I don't think O'Malley has a chance. It was promised to Hillary."

It doesn't matter whether she thinks anything was promised to her. She needs a sparring partner to keep dem issues before the voters, otherwise the whole presidential campaign will be centered on gop issues. And she may have a lead now, but she can easily screw it up. Again.
nstrdnvstr
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:41,883
Points:4,792,585
Joined:May 2001
Message Posted: Mar 14, 2015 7:12:13 AM

I don't think O'Malley has a chance. It was promised to Hillary.
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:8,688
Points:1,740,485
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Mar 14, 2015 6:30:53 AM

"I am pretty sure she will lose again.. and likely to this guy"

Maryland voters just voted in a governor whose policies are in severe conflict with the policies of "this guy," who was the governor before our present governor. Maryland is very much a blue state. However, the people were tired of "tax and spend." Hmmmm . . . does Martin O'Malley have a chance? I wonder . . .
Service66
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:27,050
Points:2,040,760
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Mar 13, 2015 11:26:24 PM


I don't think I'm alone on this point...Hillary is tired. She isn't the politician that Bill was - she (besides the privileged angle) seems to expect things to come to her, like the insider commodities trading where she never lost on any trade.

EZExit
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:17,761
Points:2,547,250
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 13, 2015 2:10:00 PM

Great news!

I just heard that Clinton is just about ready to announce her candidacy! I hope it's true, that would seal the fate of the liberal crowd.
nstrdnvstr
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:41,883
Points:4,792,585
Joined:May 2001
Message Posted: Mar 13, 2015 10:21:21 AM

But Hillary was promised that it was her turn this time. The Democrats do not have many that will run against her.
reb4
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:26,309
Points:2,661,140
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Mar 13, 2015 9:10:36 AM

I don't think Hillary is going to be the candidate in the election... remember 2008..


Everyone thought she was the candidate.... and they were wrong...


I am pretty sure she will lose again.. and likely to this guy, though it will definitely be someone younger... Demcrats will not run a candidate that is in their late 60's for president...
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,634
Points:3,247,285
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 13, 2015 8:13:27 AM

(Off Topic....a bit)...

AC, I attribute the prosperity of the Clinton years to the growing tech boom and the increases in productivity, across many industries and sectors, that happened while he happened to be prez. I thank Gates and Jobs more than any person in government. The company I work for began to computerize in 1991, with large increases in the productivity of the office staff (myself and one other person) and also computerized production equipment greatly increasing productivity on the other side of the wall.

Hillary hasn't changed her stripes in the least bit. She is a self-centered, self-serving, conniving, lying, cheating, holier-than-thou Leftist. The colleges and universities of fifty years ago were already dens of leftist utopianism, and those who came out of those schools just assume that they know everything, that they are always right, that everyone else is just stupid and pedestrian and that they should always be in charge because they were destined and chosen to lead.

She makes me sick.
AC-302
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:32,359
Points:3,612,395
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Mar 12, 2015 10:46:47 PM

Did I mention that someone sent me a .pdf of the famous memo that Hill-Billy sent out to remind her staff of no use of personal e-mails for company business.

She's such a hypocrite. But, alas, I get why the Dems "love" her. They love her because of the perceived prosperity under Bill, and long for those days. In fact, so do I, though i dont' long for the Clinton's corruption.

They're terrible people. Hillary thinks the rules don't apply to her, and that it's "her turn" to be president. She ran before and the party voted Obama. She didn't even get on the ticket. I don't understand what is different now that all of a sudden she's going to be any better. In fact, more scandals have plagued her. She ought to quit while she's behind. I predict that if she does run, she'll be soundly trounced, probably by someone in her own party.
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,634
Points:3,247,285
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 12, 2015 3:34:16 PM

The real reason Hillary is in trouble.....
.
.
. for those who don't click, I'll spill the beans.

No one likes her.
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,006
Points:2,031,900
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 8, 2015 11:19:31 PM

Mud...I think you are right on the money... Big money loved Hillary, so she had to be made dirty,,,or let us say, she was always dirty, but now she is really showing. Perhaps in an attempt to get the big money to switch to the very socialist Elizabeth.
MahopacJack
Champion Author New York

Posts:9,939
Points:1,933,905
Joined:Feb 2008
Message Posted: Mar 8, 2015 10:34:07 PM

Cirdan, >>Just remember, the classic Clinton strategy is to blow off all the bs with "it's old news." The election is still 21 months away.<<
~
Excellent point.

Benghazi was over 29 months ago and it would be ancient history for the "Peoples Party' were it not for Trey Gowdy. It is up to us to prevent the puppet for the Democrtya Elites from ever stepping foot inside the Whitehouse unless she's on a tour. (and that would only be to steal some more silverware.)

~

Cirdan
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:2,708
Points:143,485
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Mar 8, 2015 1:07:56 PM

"Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but doesn't it seem very odd to you that the MSM and the rest of the left are dumping on Hillary? Have you ever seen them do this before, no matter what she's done? "

Just remember, the classic Clinton strategy is to blow off all the bs with "it's old news." The election is still 21 months away.
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:8,688
Points:1,740,485
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Mar 7, 2015 6:40:14 AM

Huma Abedin: Clinton's Unindicted Email Co-Conspirator

3-6-15 editorial

"Abedin, perhaps best remembered as the wife of disgraced former congressman Anthony Wiener, is a longtime Hillary friend and confidante. She served as Clinton's deputy chief of staff at the same time she worked as a consultant to the Clinton Foundation and a New York advisory firm tied to the Clintons, one that did business before the government.

Abedin also has some interesting family connections. Her father is said to be close with the Saudi government's Muslim World League, and her mother is said to be a member of the Muslim Sisterhood. World Trade Center bombing prosecutor Andrew McCarthy wrote in National Review: "The ties of Ms. Abedin's father, mother and brother to the Muslim Brotherhood are both specific and substantiated."

The Muslim Brotherhood took power in Egypt with the Obama administration's approval after it had all but abandoned the government of Hosni Mubarak, a long-time ally and friend. It was while Abedin was advising Hillary that State dropped its long-standing policy of having no dealings with the Muslim Brotherhood."
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 4:38:02 PM

For sure yo do have a point there mudtoe. As someone once said - "I know I'm paranoid but the real question is am I paranoid enough?"
mudtoe
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:14,983
Points:2,071,950
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 2:52:59 PM

flyboy: "The more we learn the more any thinking honest person would say she is not fit to be president of the local PTA much less the US. "



Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but doesn't it seem very odd to you that the MSM and the rest of the left are dumping on Hillary? Have you ever seen them do this before, no matter what she's done? Rush's theory, and I can't find any holes in it, is that the left wing of the democrat party wants Hillary out of the way so that Elizabeth Warren will run. Apparently she has said that she won't run as long as Hillary is running, and the theory is that the people who want to see her run are now doing their best to meet her condition for running by torpedoing Hillary.

Hmmmm..... I'm not certain that this is the explanation, but I have to admit that the MSM's actions here are very much at odds with their previous behavior of covering for Hillary no matter what, and when you ask yourself who benefits from this, Warren's name is right at the top of the list, unless one believes that the MSM suddenly wants Jeb Bush or Scott Walker to be the next President.


mudtoe


[Edited by: mudtoe at 3/6/2015 2:53:11 PM EST]
lvskyguy
Champion Author Las Vegas

Posts:8,196
Points:1,229,310
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 2:24:04 PM

Many companies/organizations have and offer an email address to its employees and ALL company business is to be communicated through THAT server. Using that 'company-issued' address for personal use is discouraged and often an employee can be 'scolded' for personal use. It is just like contacting a customer from your personal cell phone number. Now if a business, such as United Airlines, Hertz, TSA, the School District, and so on, received an inter-office email from its employee from the employee's personal account, that employee would be questioned at the least and told to USE the Company Account. There seems to be more than one person who "overlooked" her shenanigans. Why? Because it IS HILLARY (who is so above the Law of the Land). But people will defend this scuz and echo "What's the big deal?" Bottom line: what confidential and security issues may have been accessed by hackers? It leaves doubts when one uses a Personal Account. What is one hiding?

So whoopee-doo-doo, she will turn over all her emails (really? Are we to believe ALL?) A little late, no? BUT, it would be wonderful (tho it most likely will not happen) to actually SEE WHAT she has personally expressed in personal emails as what she wrote of certain people (and Americans) - perhaps things like "...bunch of stupid ###### idiots I deal with....bunch of ##### dumb A's....this is strictly between me and you...and we can always say this....trust me, this will go no further...." etc. etc. etc. (yes, speculation, but she is capable of saying anything 'behind the scenes' - as we all do). That blonde stringy hair is no halo! She knows HOW to manipulate and circumvent the system for HER benefit and stand proud on her cake!

And certainly, anyone in business has done this, when we get on our personal accounts and communicate with a friend or co-worker, where we have criticized another person and expressed our disgust. Hence, keep Business Matters with Business Matters; Personal with Personal. Not that difficult to do and comprehend. This does not say much for our Government and National Security if things have fallen into the wrong hands.

What will be next for her Highness?
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 1:27:22 PM

When MSNBC is saying you knowingly attempted to circumvent the law --- you might be in deep doodoo.
.
.
>>>MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell continued railing against Hillary Clinton Friday morning, telling “Morning Joe” her email system was “set up, obviously, to defy” Freedom of Information Act requests to the State Department.

O’Donnell, who has been outspoken against Clinton’s email practices, added that the former secretary of state’s home email server “circumvented” such FOIA requests from news agencies such as the Associated Press, which is threatening legal action.

“The concern, the deep especially concern here is, in fact, a liberal concern because the liberal principle that is being undermined by this kind of practice and was undermined by the same practice in the Bush administration is the freedom of information,” O’Donnell said. The Freedom of Information Act was passed in 1966 over, the master of the Senate, LBJ’s objection. There was the powerful — he couldn’t stop it because the Vietnam was raging.”

“There were all sorts of reasons why people wanted to know what’s really going on in this government. There were amendments to it, improved in 1974. This has been decades. It has been a decades long crusade and it’s a great piece of liberal architecture,” O’Donnell said, setting up his point. “This e-mail system was set up obviously to defy the Freedom of Information act. E-mails were completely immune from every single Freedom of Information Act request.”

O’Donnell was critical of Clinton’s email practices the moment the news broke Monday night, when he said there was “no conceivable rational explanation” to not having a State Department email.<<<
.
.
.
The more we learn the more any thinking honest person would say she is not fit to be president of the local PTA much less the US.
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,006
Points:2,031,900
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 1:18:31 PM

Seems a hacker is not amused by her personal security. Hillary, consider your own personal emailssssss showing the public everything already as they can and are hacked.

[Edited by: mexicomaria at 3/6/2015 1:20:32 PM EST]
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:9,979
Points:1,851,330
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 1:16:01 PM

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s only comment so far about the controversy over her use of a private e-mail account came via Twitter.

Hillary Clinton tweet on e-mails viewed 3.3 million times
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 1:13:27 PM

One private account on her own server was not enough to hide all the "activity" - she had lots more private accounts she used. But trust her - she has released all the emails. Next she will say 'well it depends on what is is you know'.
.
.
>>>Although Hillary Clinton’s spokespeople have maintained that the former secretary of state only used one privately-controlled email address during her tenure, a hacker working in conjunction with Fox News discovered that there were multiple email addresses owned by Clinton. (VIDEO: Judge Napolitano: Hillary Clinton Faces ‘Three Years In Jail, Per Document’)

The anonymous hacker used a tool called “The Harvester” to scour the Internet for other email addresses under the clintonemail.com domain registered by Clinton. At least nine other email addresses have been discovered by the hacker, including some that are strikingly similar to the one avowed Hillary email, hdr22@clintonemail.com.

Other accounts included:

hdr@clintonemail.com
hdr18@clintonemail.com
hdr19@clintonemail.com
hdr20@clintonemail.com
hdr21@clintonemail.com
h.clinton@clintonemail.com
Hillary@clintonemail.com
contact@clintonemail.com
mau_suit@clintonemail.com (?!)

The hacker tells Fox News’s James Rosen that there is no way to tell whether Clinton ever actually used any of the emails, but the name similarity makes him think it’s likely she did: ”I suspect hdr18 -hdr21 may have been used by [Clinton] as well as h@clintonemail.com and hillary@clintonemail.com….I’d also be interested to learn if there were ever hdr1@ thru hdr17@.”<<<
.
.
.
The whole reason for requiring that all official government business is done on government accounts and systems is to avoid exactly what is happening right now. No one will ever know what government owned emails (you know those ones she made as part of her "job" as Sec of State) were destroyed because they might not show her as honest. But given that she has a lifetime of being dishonest we are supposed to accept that she turned over all the information to us..... Trust me I have a bridge to sell you.....
.
.
Yet the rabid liberals just dont see anything wrong with this blatant attempt to circumvent the law. Amazing is too mild a word for it...
.
.
.
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 1:05:30 PM

Looks as if the whole department that HRC was in charge of had a difficult time following policy and law. Why does this not surprise me.
.
.
.
>>>Hillary Clinton’s State Department was cited nine times by its own inspector general for improperly using personal email accounts, storing records on personal email, or not properly archiving emails.

As Clinton comes under fire for her use of the personal email account HDR22@clintonemail.com during her tenure as secretary of state, records reveal that personal email storage was a department-wide problem, both at U.S. embassies and at top State Department bureaus.

Three more inspector general reports made reference to personal email use since 2013, after Clinton left the State Department.

Let’s focus on the nine reports that circulated within the Obama administration during Clinton’s tenure at State, as flagged by the legal advocacy firm Cause of Action and provided to The Daily Caller:<<<
.
.
.
Not to worry folks its just more of that "vast right wing conspiracy"...

At this point what difference does it make.
.
.
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,006
Points:2,031,900
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 11:28:39 AM

This is a tough lesson, very tough lesson for a Teflon family of Clinton's. They are Chronic Connivers and that is a condition, my friends, that is not curable, save but by God, Himself.

In fact they are a Corporation of Chronic Connivers Clinton.

I just want a line by line expenditure list from their foundation...very slick.

I am afraid that an uneducated public and those who are lolled to sleep by anything the Democrat candidate does, will elect the Corporation of Completely inCompetent Chronic Connivers Clinton.

Is that enough "Cs" for you... coming to you from the computer keyboard of Dr. Slush.
MahopacJack
Champion Author New York

Posts:9,939
Points:1,933,905
Joined:Feb 2008
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 11:09:32 AM

I75at7AM, >> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?<<
~

Excellent post a s it directly relates to our entire corrupt government.

In this particular case, Hillary has shown absolutely no competence in being our leader yet she has received a pass from media for quite some time. Her best attribute is the ability to cover up wrong doings. This of course leads to her being manipulated by those who can and will destroy her (and hubby) should she not do their bidding.

Wikipedia had an alternate translation of the poem:

"… I know
the plan that my friends always advise me to adopt:
"Bolt her in, constrain her!" But who can watch
the watchmen? They keep quiet about the girl's
secrets and get her as their payment; everyone hushes it up."

-MJ
~
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,634
Points:3,247,285
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 8:01:59 AM

This whole tawdry episode begs the time-old question:

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
mweyant
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:8,688
Points:1,740,485
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 6:14:13 AM

Think about it . . . one submits a FOIA request to the government for information that is supposed to be legally made available to the public if the public requests it. But, look at this! The request goes straight to a server operated by a government employee who can control what goes out about said government employee herself.

The above is a sad state of affairs. Interesting to see that this is not the only current email abuse in the news . . .

Congressman DeSaulnier calls on Chemical Safety Board members to resign from 3-5-15

"Local Congressman Mark DeSaulnier (CA-11) has called for the resignations of two top officials with the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) — the federal agency that investigated the Chevron refinery fire of 2012 — citing gross mismanagement and the use of secretive emails to conduct government business.

CSB Chairman Rafel Moure-Eraso, Board Member Manny Erlich and an agency attorney are accused of purposefully using personal email accounts to avoid public scrutiny, a violation of the Federal Records Act, according to a scathing report from the Environmental Protection Agency Inspector General’s Office (OIG)."

[Edited by: mweyant at 3/6/2015 6:15:36 AM EST]
Service66
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:27,050
Points:2,040,760
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Mar 6, 2015 4:20:47 AM


"A prominent hacker tells Fox News’ James Rosen that Hillary Clinton appears to have established multiple email addresses for private use.

"Aides to the former secretary of state say she only used one private email while in office — hdr22@clintonemail.com. That domain name has been traced to a private Internet server in Clinton’s hometown of Chappaqua, N.Y. The server was registered in the name of Clinton’s former aide Eric Hothem a week before the Obama administration assumed office.

"Rosen’s hacker source employed a tool called “The Harvester” to search a number of data sources to look for references to the domain name Clintonemail.com. The source says it appears Clinton established multiple email addresses, including hdr@clintonemail.com, hdr18@clintonemail.com, hdr19@clintonemail.com, hdr20@clintonemail.com, and hrd21@clintonemail.com.

"Other email addresses include h.clinton@clintonemail.com, Hillary@clintonemail.com, contact@clintonemail.com, and mau_suit@clintonemail.com.

"It’s not clear whether Clinton used any or all of these email addresses. It’s also unclear whether her aides used them.

"Fox News reached out to the Clinton team for comment and has not heard back."

I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,634
Points:3,247,285
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 8:20:08 PM

What a bombshell, fly !!

Can we call this "Crony Corruptionism" ???

One more thing....."Bu-bye, Hillary!"
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 7:57:03 PM

More - yes ever more - HRC sleaze and corruption.....
.
.
>>>Gold Mine: Hillary Clinton’s Brother Granted Super-Rare Mining Permit from Haiti After State Dept. Sent Country Billions
.
.
Hillary Rodham Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, sat on the board of a self-described mining company that in 2012 received one of only two “gold exploitation permits” from the Haitian government—the first issued in over 50 years.

The tiny North Carolina company, VCS Mining, also included on its board Bill Clinton’s co-chair of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC), former Haitian Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive.

The Rodham gold mine revelation is just one of dozens featured in a forthcoming bombshell investigative book by three-time New York Times bestselling author Peter Schweizer, according to a Thursday statement from publishing giant HarperCollins. The publisher says the book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, is the culmination of an exhaustive one-year deep dive investigation into the nexus between the Clintons’ $100+ million personal wealth, the Clinton Foundation, and the decisions Hillary made as Secretary of State that benefited foreign donors, governments, and companies.

VCS’s coveted gold mining exploitation permit was apparently such a sweetheart deal that it outraged the Haitian senate, since royalties to be paid to the Haitian government were only 2.5%, a sum mining experts say is at least half the standard rate. Moreover, the mining project in Morne Bossa came with a generous ability to renew the project for up to 25 years. Nevertheless, the fledgling company proudly touted its luck in landing the deal.

“This is one of two permits issued today, the first permit of their kind issued in over five decades,” reads the only press release under VCS’s “news” tab on its scant website.

According to USAID, $3.1 billion have been dispersed since the 2010 Haiti earthquake.

Clinton Cash is said to contain “seismic” and “game-changing” revelations that far eclipse anything presently reported on the Clinton Foundation’s violation of its agreement not to accept foreign government money during Hillary’s tenure as secretary of state.<<<
.
.
.
The more things involving the HRC are looked at the more corruption and rotten smells issue forth.
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 7:22:36 PM

More actual proof the HRC knew that using her private email system for official business was wrong!
.
.
>>>Though she was personally using private email accounts and servers, Hillary Clinton signed a cable while she was Secretary of State warning State Department employees not to use their personal email accounts for national security reasons.
On Thursday, Fox News obtained an unclassified 2011 cable, with Clinton’s electronic signature, that was “sent to Diplomatic and Consular Staff in June 2011.”
The cable notes that the State Department is “expected to provide, and employees are expected to use, approved secure methods to transmit SBU [sensitive but unclassified] information when available and practical.”
It also warns employees not to “auto-forward” emails to “an address outside the Department’s network” and “avoid conducting official Department from your personal e-mail accounts” because those accounts are not as secure as State Department accounts.
The cable was reportedly “addressed to all diplomatic and consular posts with the subject line ‘Securing Personal E-mail Accounts.'”
Politico reported that the State Department has actually “had a policy in place since 2005 to warn officials against routine use of personal e-mail accounts for government work, a regulation in force during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state that appears to be at odds with her reliance on a private email for agency business.<<<<
.
.
.
The bad news just keeps on mounting that HRC purposely did what she did and she knew it was against policy and more than likely she knew it was illegal to boot.

Just more proof that she is unfit for any federal job and that she needs a stretch in the grey bar hotel to meditate on the error of her ways.
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:28,570
Points:884,380
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 6:30:13 PM



I like it.

"HRN" has a ring to it.

'Hillary Richard Nixon'!

Add it to "HRC" - Her Royal Cankleness!

ROTFL

RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:55,200
Points:1,450,955
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 5:45:11 PM

175, you beat me on that. I was going to start a thread on the email hypocrisy and duplicity...

Disturbing to say the least...
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 5:29:39 PM

More interesting times for HRC
.
.
>>>The group Veterans for a Strong America plans to sue the State Department over a Freedom of Information Action request it filed for Hillary Clinton’s emails and phone logs from the days before and after the attack at Benghazi.

Joel Arends, the group’s chairman and founder, has brought on Mark Zaid, an attorney who specializes in national security and FOIA litigation cases, to handle the lawsuit.

Arends filed a FOIA request in July 2014 for Clinton’s emails and phone logs for around the time of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

“We didn’t embark on a fishing expedition,” Arends told The Daily Caller. “All that we want are the records from the night before and the day after [Benghazi].”<<<
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 5:25:24 PM

Hillary being called Nixonian is really classic - what a hoot.....
.
.
>>>Illinois Rep. Peter Roskam, a member of the Select Committee on Benghazi, compared Hillary Clinton to President Richard Nixon Thursday over news that the Democrat used private email accounts to conduct official government business while serving as secretary of state.

“For months the Select Committee has pressed the State Department for access to all communications from key officials on watch during the Benghazi terrorist attacks,” Roskam said in a statement.

“Yet until last week, the administration failed to mention that countless e-mails from Secretary Clinton have been missing from this search because she exclusively used private accounts during her tenure,” Roskam said. “This disturbing revelation raises serious questions regarding whether Secretary Clinton complied with federal record keeping requirements and the Obama administration’s record policies.”

Added Roskam: “The last time we saw a high government official seeking to edit their own responses was President Nixon, and at least then he enjoyed the benefit of executive privilege.”<<<

The real question is - will the liberals even care about what she did?
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 5:14:44 PM

Sorry I75 - I didnt see your post before I hit send on mine... But it does show that great minds run together.....
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 5:12:42 PM

So people directly under Hillary were fired for use of private email but Hillary is not held to the same rules? HUMMMMMMMMM
.
.
>>>The U.S. ambassador to Kenya was forced out in 2012 after an inspector general report showed managerial incompetence, including his use of a private email system to evade agency rules.

The ambassador’s boss, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, also used her own private email system.

Many of the report’s criticism of the ambassador also apply to Clinton’s use of her own-mail system, which was installed in her home without the usual anti-hacker and record-keeping capabilities required by agency rules.

The Kenya ambassador revelation exposes Clinton to additional charges of hypocrisy, along with the rising claims that she violated ethical norms and legal requirements.<<<But Hillary is still operating under the much used concept that the rules are made for everyone but the Clintons.

Tacobelle------- I loved your accidental pun.....

[Edited by: flyboyUT at 3/5/2015 5:13:14 PM EST]
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,634
Points:3,247,285
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 5:10:12 PM

Paduwan, wail is the verb you seek.

Wailing on a target is way different from just wailing. And in a different ocean than whaling!

Anyway, HRC (Her Royal Canklesness) has accomplished one thing - becoming one of the world's leading hypocrites!

Read what transpired under her State Department leadership:
[L=http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/text deleted State Department Ousted Ambassador for Using Private Email[/L]
"In 2012, U.S. Ambassador to Kenya Scott Gration abruptly stepped down from his post."
"While Gration was fired for a myriad of reasons, one passage of the damning report leaps out in light of recent events: "
"Very soon after the Ambassador’s arrival in May 2011, he broadcast his lack of confidence in the information management staff....He ordered a commercial Internet connection installed in his embassy office bathroom so he could work there on a laptop not connected to the Department email system. He drafted and distributed a mission policy authorizing himself and other mission personnel to use commercial email for daily communication of official government business."
"State Department policy was very clear. Using a private email outside the State Department's secure system was completely unacceptable."

More about her scheme to hide the complete contents of her private email system here:
House investigators: Hillary Clinton engaged in a 'scheme to conceal' her email
"As Chairman Gowdy noted, former Secretary Clinton has left herself in the unique position of being the only one to determine what records the American people are entitled to," Ware said. "This has significant negative implications for transparency and government oversight, as well as for media and others who have a legitimate interest in understanding the Secretary's time in office."
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,006
Points:2,031,900
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 2:47:59 PM

Why not just give her personal server to the Benghazi committee, nope, she is playing Clinton speak with the public.

I75, hahahah I actually asked this fine Mr. Google if it was whaling, or waling....help me. It is whale as a verb. Now, is when I miss Nerine (well truth be know, I miss her all the time)..she loved making nouns into verbs.
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:75,634
Points:3,247,285
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 12:21:58 PM

Mexico, I thought whaling was illegal !!
nraacct
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:9,979
Points:1,851,330
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 12:16:40 PM

Hillary Clinton broke her 48-hour silence over the use of her personal email account while she served as secretary of State with a late-night tweet Wednesday saying she wants "the public to see my email." But her response is unlikely to tamp down the pressure for answers as she faces the deepest scrutiny she's been under since leaving the government. "I asked State to release them," Clinton tweeted at 11:35 p.m. EST. "They said they will review them for release as soon as possible."

Hillary Clinton asks State to release emails
mexicomaria
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:28,006
Points:2,031,900
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 11:21:36 AM

Interesting video of Hillary whaling on Bush for use of Private email.

Hillary being transparent.
Cirdan
Champion Author Nevada

Posts:2,708
Points:143,485
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Mar 5, 2015 1:13:11 AM

I always think of her as the Democrats Richard Nixon.
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:28,570
Points:884,380
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2015 10:54:16 PM



Panama, "Too much baggage..."

Yup, she has a lot of junk in the trunk!

As well as in the CANKLES!

Have any of you watched her closely lately as she walks on stage to make once of her $500,000 speeches?

It is 50 pounds of potatoes in a 10 pound sack!

;-)

flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2015 10:51:07 PM

Has no one wondered what a STU4 phone was doing in the First Ladies office in the first place? She has no reason to have need of a tops secret phone does she?
reb4
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:26,309
Points:2,661,140
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2015 10:44:21 PM

Amid Clinton controversies, Democrats yearn for an alternative

Too much baggage...
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2015 4:23:37 PM

Is this a pattern emerging? Can Hillary be trusted on anything?
.
.
.
>>>As the Hillary Clinton email scandal unfolds, and a growing number of computer experts worry that her secretive private email server jeopardized national security by being less secure than the State Department system she was required by law to use, it’s interesting to note that the report covers what the Clinton gang did to the White House telephone systems on their way out the door — they cut some of the phone lines, vandalized dozens of expensive phone sets, and left obscene messages on the voice mail system. The section concludes with this little detail: “A stu3 phone in the First Lady’s office was left open with the key in it.”

Stu3 phones are secure telephones, required for use when discussing classified information. This is not the sort of equipment that should be carelessly left open in a vacated office with the security key in it. The instructions for handling such secure telephones specify that they must be protected as carefully as the classified information they are authorized to transmit.

The Clintons and their staffers don’t seem to have any compunctions about saddling the American people with the costs of their pride and petulance. This spirit of arrogance and irresponsibility doesn’t inspire confidence that Hillary Clinton was exceedingly cautions when she set up her private email network as Secretary of State.<<<
flyboyUT
Champion Author Utah

Posts:30,253
Points:1,717,340
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2015 4:03:59 PM

OK libs - try and tell me again that Hillary was not trying to hide things. Tell me again why anyone in their right mind should ever trust her.
.
.
>>>The moment comes about three and a half minutes into the segment, when Clinton declares, “As much as I’ve been investigated and all of that, you know, why would I… I don’t even want… why would I ever want to do email?”

Buzzfeed explains the context of the clip: “The homemade movie clip that revealed the anecdote was in an ABC report about accusations by a Hollywood multimillionaire of ‘aggressive fundraiser practice’ by the Clintons. The homemade video of Clinton was a fundraiser for her 2000 Senate campaign.”

It would be safe to bet that many politicians have expressed reservations about using email, which is so much harder to get rid of than sheets of paper or unrecorded phone conversations. That’s why the attempts to protest Clinton’s innocence are so ridiculous – as she’s noting in this clip, she and Bill have seen their share of investigations in the past, and would clearly appreciate the value of avoiding automatically-archived, FOIA- and subpoena-responsive government mail systems. Clintonistas will of course insist that she meant she had been investigated unfairly, and worried that politically-motivated prosecutions would pluck details from her pure and innocent electronic correspondence to harass her, but there’s no way to maintain the aura of feigned innocence while making that case.

The only thing left for Clinton’s defenders is to concoct an argument that Hillary thought her private mail server would be more secure than the State Department system she was supposed to use. I would suggest they think long and hard before deploying that excuse, because we don’t know much about the security capabilities of her mail server yet, it would hardly excuse her evasion of record-keeping requirements… and it would be a rather devastating criticism of the Big Government Democrats are supposed to revere, wouldn’t it?

The State Department system is so lame Hillary knew it was better to whip up her own server, without saying anything official or public about the perceived vulnerability of that enormously expensive government network? Do you really want to go with that after years of Obama Administration debacles like HealthCareDotGov, kids?<<<
.
.
.
Go ahead explain why she did what she did - this could get really interesting.....
Post a reply Back to Topics