Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    5:24 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: US politics > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Is it time for Christians to leave the Democrat Party??? Back to Topics
no1doc

Champion Author
Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Oct 1, 2012 7:12:57 PM

Bishop E.W. Jackson Message to Black Christians

"It is time for a mass exodus of Christians out of the Democrat Party…

My friends, the Democrat Party and their progressive coalition have become anti-God, anti-bible, anti-church, anti-family, anti-marriage, and anti-life. They have turned their backs on Christians.

It is time to turn our backs on them."

~ Bishop E. W. Jackson, founder and current president of S.T.A.N.D.
*************

So what do you think? Is it time?
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 27, 2014 10:08:32 AM

"So just because God gives us freewill and therefore the ability to sin, we have the "right" to sin?"
...

That idea is just bad theology.
It's difficult for any Christian with an understanding of Salvation history, the purpose for Christ's Incarnation, and Passion, and what it means to be born again to get their mind around that kind of reasoning.

We've seen similar arguments made by atheists but, in their case, it's understandable; they can't be expected to have have any complete understanding of the Faith.

Profile Pic
Passer
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:19,597
Points:2,338,770
Joined:Jan 2004
Message Posted: Aug 27, 2014 3:14:27 AM

Let God judge the sinners,

Not Republicans!!

(even though they think they are better)
Profile Pic
Passer
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:19,597
Points:2,338,770
Joined:Jan 2004
Message Posted: Aug 27, 2014 3:11:54 AM

God gave us free will.

Woe to any man who tries to take it away!
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 26, 2014 8:58:44 PM

"So just because God gives us freewill and therefore the ability to sin, we have the "right" to sin?"


I never said that. Again, I said we have the right to choose; and even showed that scripture supports that right to choose as well.

I guess since people are saying things I have not, then they must agree that people do have the right to choose...

Um, ok.
Profile Pic
gas_too_high
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:15,137
Points:2,525,070
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Aug 26, 2014 8:50:05 PM

So just because God gives us freewill and therefore the ability to sin, we have the "right" to sin?

GTH
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 26, 2014 1:13:10 PM

"Is it really that simple?"

Yes it is.

Every person has been given right to choose and that is what you have a problem with. Starting with Adam and Eve, they were told not to eat of the tree, but yet, inherently had the choice whether or not to obey that instruction. Sadly they chose poorly and we all suffer. Nevertheless, God did not force them to obey, he set the choice before them and it was their choice to make.

And so it is with every single person, male or female, on the planet. Each of us have the choice to do good or evil with our lives; no one can make that choice for us, nor should any think they can take that choice away from anyone else. To wit, while I may not like, agree or approve of choices others make for their lives, it yet is THEIR choice to make; and the consequences of those choices are also theirs to bear, not mine. But hey, don't take my word for it, Moses put it best:

"“For this commandment that I command you today is not too hard for you, neither is it far off. It is not in heaven, that you should say, ‘Who will ascend to heaven for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it?’ Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, ‘Who will go over the sea for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it?’ But the word is very near you. It is in your mouth and in your heart, so that you can do it. “See, I have set before you today life and good, death and evil. If you obey the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you today, by loving the Lord your God, by walking in his ways, and by keeping his commandments and his statutes and his rules, then you shall live and multiply, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land that you are entering to take possession of it. But if your heart turns away, and you will not hear, but are drawn away to worship other gods and serve them, I declare to you today, that you shall surely perish. You shall not live long in the land that you are going over the Jordan to enter and possess. I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live, loving the Lord your God, obeying his voice and holding fast to him, for he is your life and length of days, that you may dwell in the land that the Lord swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.”" (Deuteronomy 30:11-20)

Bingo and Boom.






"God never gave us the right to commit adultery (or any other sin). Quite the opposite, God clearly gave us the right to expect fidelity from our spouses. It's implicit in the Commandment, Thou Shall Not Commit Adultery; it's also explicit in our natural marriage (which God also gave us) vows. How could He then give us the "right" to commit adultery? He'd be contradicting Himself. He knows full well that a house divided against itself cannot stand. Choosing adultery (or any sin) isn't a right. It's a personal decision/choice we make. It's a weakness of our fallen nature. We keep nibbling at that forbidden fruit, pushing God away, refusing His Graces."

Again, I never said God gives us the right to sin, but rather that God gives us the right to choose (see my points above and the citation from Deut. 30); and sometimes in those choices, we choose to sin (yes, EVERYBODY makes that choice at some time or another).






"Did God really give your son the right to "choose differently than you" and disobey you?"


Again if my son chooses to disobey me and take my car and totals it, then he chose poorly and will have to bear the consequences for that poor choice; but again, good or bad, it was HIS choice. And in fact, he may actually shorten his days on the earth by making such a choice when said choice leads to fatal injuries suffered from a crash that totaled my car.
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 26, 2014 12:12:39 PM

Norm, " The right to choose how to live one's life comes from the creator. Its pretty simple."
...
Is it really that simple? He gave us the RIGHT to freely chose what is right but, He gave us the FREE WILL to chose what is wrong. He gave us a choice. Choosing rightly is a right, choosing wrongly is a wrong.

God told our first parents they could eat from any tree in the garden but, not from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. If they ate from that tree, God said they would die.

He set boundaries and consequences. Loving fathers do that. He set before them (as He sets before us) good and evil, life and death. He tells us to chose life. Was their choice of evil a right, or was it just a bad choice?

We've always looked upon God given rights as worthy of defending. If you think Adam and Eve's choice of evil was a right, will you defend it? If so, what's the defense? Eve's defense was, "The serpent beguiled me and I did eat." (No claim of any right there just, "the Devil made me do it"). Adam, the wimp, in essence blamed God, more specifically blaming, "...the woman You gave me". "(See what You made me do?")

But God didn't buy either defense then and there's no reason to believe He'd buy your, "The right to choose how to live one's life comes from the creator. "

Natural rights (God given rights) flow from God's Commandments; and the responsibilities they entail are clearly apparent. The responsibilities that flow from God given rights are in themselves virtuous, like the rights themselves.

God never gave us the right to commit adultery (or any other sin). Quite the opposite, God clearly gave us the right to expect fidelity from our spouses. It's implicit in the Commandment, Thou Shall Not Commit Adultery; it's also explicit in our natural marriage (which God also gave us) vows. How could He then give us the "right" to commit adultery? He'd be contradicting Himself. He knows full well that a house divided against itself cannot stand. Choosing adultery (or any sin) isn't a right. It's a personal decision/choice we make. It's a weakness of our fallen nature. We keep nibbling at that forbidden fruit, pushing God away, refusing His Graces.

God given rights come with responsibilities to act for good - what responsibility comes with fornication or adultery? The responsibility not to get caught? Or not to contract an STD? The responsibilities that flow from God given rights are in themselves virtuous, like the rights themselves.

If God actually gave us the right to sin, how could a just God condemn the exercise of those supposed "rights" ?

God given rights enable us to do good not evil.

Norm, " If you don't like that He gave others the rights to choose differently than you; then take it up with the Lord."

Did God really give your son the right to "choose differently than you" and disobey you?
Imagine forbidding your underage son to drive the family car. He totals the car and tells dad he chose differently than you and, "If you don't like it, take it up with the Lord."

Of course God gave him no such right. He gave you the right to be honored by your son and He gave your son the responsibility of giving you that honor, "so that his days may be long on this earth."

Pope Pius XII said that the greatest sin of our time is "to have lost all sense of sin,"


[Edited by: no1doc at 8/26/2014 12:14:14 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Passer
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:19,597
Points:2,338,770
Joined:Jan 2004
Message Posted: Aug 23, 2014 6:33:53 PM

"Tolerance is the last virtue of a man with no convictions." - GK Chesterton

But once Republicans are Indicted, they seem to have no trouble getting their convictions!

But to their "credit" they are never even accused of "Tolerance".

Hypocrites, (when they call themselves "Christian") seldom are.
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 23, 2014 10:25:08 AM

"Tolerance is the last virtue of a man with no convictions." - GK Chesterton
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 22, 2014 10:36:44 AM

Thanks for that answer Norm. Glad you agree that rights come from God. I haven't been ignoring you, just working on a proper response for you which is taking some time. - more to follow
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2014 7:53:37 AM

"It was still legal to kill people for not succumbing to religion addiction/psychosis before the USA was officially formed, so Jefferson had to be careful what he said early on and how he said it..."


Well Buzz, the Declaration was written (1776) long before your quote (1787), and by then the colonies were free from England's grasp and governed by the Articles of Confederation. Not to mention that his acknowledgement of God that A1 and I pointed out to you was after that (circa 1807), so there was no longer a need to be careful about anything as by then the Constitution and all its freedoms were the law of the land (since 1790).

Thus, if he didn't believe in God in his earlier life, its pretty clear that he did in his latter days, just like many of us today...

So again Buzzy, you're just wrong.
Profile Pic
BuzzLOL
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:4,995
Points:57,605
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2014 6:27:15 AM

.
. It was still legal to kill people for not succumbing to religion addiction/psychosis before the USA was officially formed, so Jefferson had to be careful what he said early on and how he said it...

"Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear." -Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:25,439
Points:724,915
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2014 12:56:34 AM



Here is what Thomas Jefferson DID say...

"“Among the most inestimable of our blessings is that … of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support.”– Thomas Jefferson, Reply to Baptist Address, 1807"

Thomas Jefferson and "Worshipping Our Creator"

Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:25,439
Points:724,915
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2014 12:45:58 AM



Buzzer, "he made sure freedom from religion was a founding premise of the USA and his state of Virginia... "

Oh did he?

Care to back that up?

Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2014 12:29:01 AM

"Jefferson has been quoted as saying there is no 'God'."


And here was also quoted of saying thee is a God:

"Say nothing of my religion. It is known to God and myself alone. Its evidence before the world is to be sought in my life: if it has been honest and dutiful to society the religion which has regulated it cannot be a bad one." - Thomas Jefferson
Profile Pic
BuzzLOL
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:4,995
Points:57,605
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Aug 20, 2014 12:11:58 AM

.
< "From what I understand, Thomas was a Deist, meaning he believed in God, unlike you... " >

. Jefferson has been quoted as saying there is no 'God'... and he made sure freedom from religion was a founding premise of the USA and his state of Virginia...

. Yes, it's true I've never had religion addiction/psychosis mental illness...

_________________________________________________________________

+++++++++++++ RELIGION ERADICATION SPECIALIST +++++++++++++
.

[Edited by: BuzzLOL at 8/20/2014 12:13:19 AM EST]
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 11:45:23 PM

Thanks for that "...Gun foes should tell the whole story" link TD. Lotsa myth busting there. Very illuminating.
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 11:05:55 PM

"Jefferson deliberately used a term that could be taken many different ways..."


Buzz, you weren't even born or thought of when Thomas penned the paper...so how would you even know what he was thinking??? From what I understand, Thomas was a Deist, meaning he believed in God, unlike you...
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 11:03:55 PM

"Of course their is. A lot of people discuss topics with me. And quite a number of people have rejected you, and your insults, derision, and sarcasm."


Great, Mr. Pilgrim; and at the same time, a LOT of people know who you are, no matter how many times you are banned and return or how many times you change you handle and/or avatar.

Moreover, then that should also mean that you should not expect me to respond to you.

Thanks for clearing that up.
Profile Pic
BuzzLOL
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:4,995
Points:57,605
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 9:49:49 PM

.
. My Creators were my parents... no imaginary faggot sky fairies/'Gods' involved... Jefferson deliberately used a term that could be taken many different ways...
Profile Pic
Troller_Diesel
Champion Author Denver

Posts:1,873
Points:16,645
Joined:Jun 2014
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 9:30:32 PM

Of course their is. A lot of people discuss topics with me. And quite a number of people have rejected you, and your insults, derision, and sarcasm.

Repeatedly.

The problem is that you're blinded by your own hate, and believe your own false accusations against others, and refuse to recognize it or even acknowledge it.

Sad. Very sad.

SMH
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 8:58:15 PM

"And, once again, you've avoided the discussion with the usual troll tactics of deflecting the discussion."


No avoidance or deflection at all; there simply is no discussion with you.
Profile Pic
Troller_Diesel
Champion Author Denver

Posts:1,873
Points:16,645
Joined:Jun 2014
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 8:50:08 PM

And which insults were they?

But, of course, you're blind to your OWN insults and derision and hyper-sensitive to everyone else's...

And, once again, you've avoided the discussion with the usual troll tactics of deflecting the discussion.

Oh, well.

SMH

[Edited by: Troller_Diesel at 8/19/2014 8:52:59 PM EST]
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 8:25:28 PM

"You constantly waste everyone else's time with your insults, derision, and guffaws, perhaps your time would be better spent on learning what a straw man argument is, and how to avoid it?"



Well, since Doc and I have had a pretty decent conversation bereft of your insults and snide remarks, my time is obviously better spent continuing the same with my brother and not waste my time with your foolishness, Mr. Pilgrim.
Profile Pic
Troller_Diesel
Champion Author Denver

Posts:1,873
Points:16,645
Joined:Jun 2014
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 7:54:02 PM

ROTFLNorm: "God gives each of us the right to choose...If you don't like that He gave others the rights to choose differently than you; then take it up with the Lord."

Troller_Diesel: "No one is disputing that people have free will, or "choice." But those choices come with consequences, some negative. Many deadly."

Do you even read before you reply?

ROTFLNorm: "Hmm...it seems EVERYTHING you don't agree with is a Strawman Mr. Pilgrim, so that is why I don't waste my time conversing with you..."

Would it be helpful, then, to point out that this is another Straw Man?

You constantly waste everyone else's time with your insults, derision, and guffaws, perhaps your time would be better spent on learning what a straw man argument is, and how to avoid it?

Would you like me to post a link to a discussion of what straw man arguments are and how to avoid them for you?

It might help you to avoid looking foolish when you make such comments as the one above...
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 7:15:28 PM

Again, the question was:

"Choices come from the individual, where do rights come from?"

And Jefferson answered it more eloquently than I

""We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness""

The right to choose how to live one's life comes from the creator. Its pretty simple.

Moreover, people had that right even BEFORE there was a Declaration of Independence, a US Constitution or even an America (which is why I cited those verses).

God gives each of us the right to choose...If you don't like that He gave others the rights to choose differently than you; then take it up with the Lord.
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 6:54:06 PM

Hmm...it seems EVERYTHING you don't agree with is a Strawman Mr. Pilgrim, so that is why I don't waste my time conversing with you...
Profile Pic
Troller_Diesel
Champion Author Denver

Posts:1,873
Points:16,645
Joined:Jun 2014
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 6:44:05 PM

What does the Declaration of Independence, a letter to the King of England, have to do with the Constitution of the United States, the document that created a nation?

Obviously, the First Amendment allows freedom of religion within the context of the Bill of Rights.

No one is disputing that people have free will, or "choice." But those choices come with consequences, some negative. Many deadly.

However, your reply doesn't even come close to addressing no1doc's comment.

So, apparently you made a choice to simply slaughter another innocent straw man...

Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 6:27:28 PM

Clearly, you equate choice and right. A right is a choice; a choice isn't necessarily a right. It's the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Choices. Choices come from the individual, where do rights come from? "


Probably from the same place Jefferson was referring to:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"

The Choice to live one's life as they please, is a right bestowed to man from the creator. You and I may not like how people choose to live their lives, but they do have that choice of self-determination; even if that choice leads to self-destruction -- because they have that right given to them from God.

It seems THAT is what you do not want to accept that people are given the right to choose from above because you don't like their choices...

[Edited by: RNorm at 8/19/2014 6:30:16 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Troller_Diesel
Champion Author Denver

Posts:1,873
Points:16,645
Joined:Jun 2014
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 6:09:45 PM

Passer: "President Reagan & his press secretary learned first hand what lack of reasonable gun control could do."

Nonsense.

...Gun foes should tell the whole story

Liberals seem to think gun control is a "magic bullet" that will prevent crime.

It isn't. Never has been, never will be.

"His press secretary, to his eternal credit, devoted the rest of his life to his sacred cause."

No he didn't. He, even more so than his wife, Sarah Brady, were puppets of Handgun Control, Inc.

Just more Progmunist rainbow and unicorn-fart utopia based on made-up facts.



[Edited by: Troller_Diesel at 8/19/2014 6:14:17 PM EST]
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 5:58:08 PM

It's not about liking or not liking your phrasing. It's about meaning. Clearly, you equate choice and right. A right is a choice; a choice isn't necessarily a right. It's the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Choices. Choices come from the individual, where do rights come from?
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 3:48:29 PM

"My reading the bible and God not forcing anyone to believe in Him are both irrelevant to understanding your original statement regarding "rights", fornication and adultery. An atheist with no scripture knowledge would have the same understanding of your statement. "


Again, in a free society, a person has the right, i.e., choice, to live as they please (as long as the exercising of their rights (i.e., choices) are not trampling on the rights and/or choices of another.

So whether or not you like how I phrased what I said, people do have the right to choose to live as they please, including the right to live immorally if they choose (as long as their choices are not violating the rights of others, i.e., murder, rape, other crimes, etc).

And an atheist with no scripture knowledge will understand that as well...
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 3:31:17 PM

What you said was, "Some people can't accept that others have the right to live as they please, even if their choices, i.e., fornication, adultery to name a few, are immoral (as far as scripture goes)."

1) Sure sounds like you just said that other people have a right to fornicate and commit adultery. And 2) that some people can't accept that."You need to read your bible. God does not force anyone to believe in Him or follow his word. If you read your bible, you'd know that.
...........

My reading the bible and God not forcing anyone to believe in Him are both irrelevant to understanding your original statement regarding "rights", fornication and adultery. An atheist with no scripture knowledge would have the same understanding of your statement.
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 1:57:36 PM

"doc, "For any Christian to suggest we have a right to sin is at least very misguided, if not blasphemous."

Norm, "Don't twist what I said." ... There's no twist.

What you said was, "Some people can't accept that others have the right to live as they please, even if their choices, i.e., fornication, adultery to name a few, are immoral (as far as scripture goes)."

1) Sure sounds like you just said that other people have a right to fornicate and commit adultery. And 2) that some people can't accept that."


You need to read your bible. God does not force anyone to believe in Him or follow his word. If you read your bible, you'd know that.

What I said was simple and true -- namely, since men have free will, they can choose to believe God and follow his Word or not. And if people choose not to believe God and ignore His Word, then they will do the things God's in His Word says not to do, i.e., like commit fornication or adultery, etc.

That I understand that does NOT in any way, shape, form or fashion equate that I'm saying that what people choose to do in their lives is right...but simply that God gives them the same free will he gave me to choose His way or their own. And again, the Bible says this as well:

"Now therefore fear the Lord and serve him in sincerity and in faithfulness. Put away the gods that your fathers served beyond the River and in Egypt, and serve the Lord. And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the Lord, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." (Joshua 24:14-15)


"And Elijah came near to all the people and said, “How long will you go limping between two different opinions? If the Lord is God, follow him; but if Baal, then follow him.” And the people did not answer him a word." (1 Kings 18:21)

So again, people DO have the right, via free will, to choose how they will live their lives.

Don't get it twisted.


[Edited by: RNorm at 8/19/2014 1:59:16 PM EST]
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 1:53:18 PM

From TD's link:

"You can't legislate morality!

The origin of that claim is revealing. Even in its earliest iterations, the argument was made in connection with the larger effort to secularize the country and establish the public school system as the arbiter and instructor of all things related to "morality" and "virtue." It was part of the effort to exclude faith from all debates in the public square.

The earliest use of the phrase was in a book published in 1856. Written at the outset of this country's debate over the establishment of a public school system, here's what the author argued:

You cannot legislate men to morality; you must educate them to liberty and virtue . . . and the schools must give to the country a people who will require no such despotic laws. (James P. Hambleton)

Since then, the use of the argument has been singularly one-sided. It has tended to be used by those advocating for the "new morality," those who use the phrase as a club against all adherents of "traditional morality." Yet the advocates of the "new morality" (sometimes cynically described as the "old immorality") see no hypocrisy in their pursuit of legislation embracing their more permissive views of right and wrong. In such areas as abortion, sex education, and marriage, they have been quick to slam their opponents as "legislating morality" while they blithely pursue their own agenda to not only permit, but often to encourage and even impose, their less restrictive views."
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 1:39:55 PM

doc, "For any Christian to suggest we have a right to sin is at least very misguided, if not blasphemous."

Norm, "Don't twist what I said." ... There's no twist.

What you said was, "Some people can't accept that others have the right to live as they please, even if their choices, i.e., fornication, adultery to name a few, are immoral (as far as scripture goes)."

1) Sure sounds like you just said that other people have a right to fornicate and commit adultery. And 2) that some people can't accept that.

I do agree with you on item 2. You're right, millions don't believe/accept that others have such rights, ..... and you give the impression, at least at times, that you're not among us.

doc, "The political aspect only exists because the government began inserting itself into these issues (usually through the courts), promoting sexual immorality."

Norm, "No, it exists because people are insistent on trying to legislate morality in a free, democratic society."

Our society has been legislating morality since it began. Laws can't make an evil man good but, they can make him think twice about doing evil. We all have the freedom to fornicate but, none of us have the right, regardless of SCOTUS decisions.

[Edited by: no1doc at 8/19/2014 1:43:20 PM EST]
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 10:00:19 AM

Getting back to the OP, the left likes to paint the right as racists. As Jackson said,

"They have saturated the black community with ridiculous lies. Unless we support the Democrat Party, we will be returned to slavery. We will be robbed of voting rights. The Martin Luther King holiday will be repealed. They think that we are stupid and that these lies will hold us captive, while they violate everything we believe as Christians."
....

Our county sheriff is a conservative democrat who happens to be black. He never toes the democrat party line and is very outspoken. Liberals have no use for him and have been trying to unseat him the last two election cycles. They ran the nasty commercials and ads usually reserved for attacking GOP candidates. It was reported that Michael Bloomberg was funding Clarke's opponent in the partisan primary we had last Tuesday .
The voters had to declare one party or the other and if they voted for any candidates of the undeclared party, their ballot wasn't counted. Don't know of any conservatives who voted for the GOP candidates, they wanted Clarke to make it through the primary.

It was probably the closest race on the ballot but, on election night Clarke had the lead and he closed the evening early so his supporters wouldn't have to wait for the final returns. He first thanked God, then his wife. He also thanked three local conservative talk show hosts by name.

It was a hoot to see the liberals attacking the black guy and those "racist" conservatives coming to his rescue.


[Edited by: no1doc at 8/19/2014 10:03:50 AM EST]
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2014 4:52:18 PM

"A PRAYER here for James Brady, another homicide and at least James was among the rarest of individuals --

someone who had the chance to do something positive about his own homicide!"
...
RIP Jim. Ali Agca, the man who shot JPII converted to Christianity after the Pope visited him in prison.
Profile Pic
Passer
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:19,597
Points:2,338,770
Joined:Jan 2004
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2014 2:14:43 PM

President Reagan & his press secretary learned first hand what lack of reasonable gun control could do.

His press secretary, to his eternal credit, devoted the rest of his life to his sacred cause.

A PRAYER here for James Brady, another homicide and at least James was among the rarest of individuals --

someone who had the chance to do something positive about his own homicide!

Amen

Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 17, 2014 4:18:09 PM

Joe Piscopo, "When I met President Reagan, I felt inspired. I want to feel inspired again. Like Reagan, I think the time has come for me to leave the party I’ve been a member of my entire life — not because I want to leave it, but because it has already left me."
...

A lot of conservatives know how you feel.

Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2014 1:26:12 PM

MM, "Here is MY tax dollar at work at Planned Parenthood. Fabulous .

I will not post the videos because I end up out of here when I post videos,..."
...

Thanks for getting back to the OP.

Ah yes, I remember the post that got you banned. Made me proud of our liberal friends when they went to bat for you to bring you back. Thanks again guys.

Your recent post gets us back to the unholy alliance between Planned Parenthood and the Democrat Party, which Jackson touched on in the OP.
He was referring to the disparate number of black babies being aborted by PP. Your post brings up another problem. The video starts with a news report of a 43 year man who was accidentally asphyxiated by his under age sex partner using an electrical cord. In the rest of the video, a Planned Parenthood counselor is instructing an under age girl (undercover) on bondage, asphyxia, sex toys, as well as activities involving urination and defecation.

We used to call that sort of thing corruption of minors. Evidently PP considers it a part of "comprehensive sex education".



Time to pull the plug on our tax dollars going the this organization. Their founding mission was to spread contraception. They're not supposed to be using our tax dollars to fund abortions. Well, thanks to Obamacare, contraception is free. No need for separate contraception funding for PP. Yeah, yeah, I know they test for venereal diseases, collect pap smears and refer for mammograms. But, so do thousands of legitimate medical entities which don't receive any special tax funding.

Subsidizing PP because they perform some legitimate activities is a little like subsidizing an arsonist because he also sells fire extinguishers.

I once met a guy who was into the sexual asphyxia thing. He was in the county morgue cooler. Sadly, the body, dressed in drag, was discovered by his son.

Lord save us.





[Edited by: no1doc at 8/16/2014 1:28:28 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Passer
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:19,597
Points:2,338,770
Joined:Jan 2004
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 5:27:41 PM

"The United States is not a democracy. It is, and always has been, a representative republic..."

Doesn't change my answer one bit.

"Because if they didn't have the right, and were castigated for it by self righteous people who too often thought they were morally superior and beyond reproach like extremists everywhere, this would no longer be a Representative Republic."


"Actually, some of us do..."

RNorm, you are not the "real" Christians I was referring to. You are a REAL Christian! And the difference is night and day.

Profile Pic
wbacon
Champion Author Philadelphia

Posts:16,042
Points:3,585,500
Joined:Jun 2004
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 5:21:43 PM

yes way past t ime
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 5:01:02 PM

"Glad you knew that."

Yeah, I DO read my bible; often and daily.




"So Obama is just bringing about the end of days?!"

Um, the end of days will come, REGARDLESS of who's president; and I'm sure you know that.







"Which one are you claiming that Obama is?"

Neither. Has he miraculously recovered from a fatal wound? Then he ain't the one.

You should know that...
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 4:31:24 PM

"Is the world a safer place, the Middle East more stable,"
...

I'll mark you down as a no. I agree.
Profile Pic
AnotherOne
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:25,439
Points:724,915
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 4:18:05 PM



"Is the world a safer place, the Middle East more stable,"RNorm, "And that is a believer asking this?

Doesn't the bible say that there will be MORE wars and rumors of wars towards the end of days? So how can you ask is the world a safer place?"

Why yes it does, RNorm.

Glad you knew that.

So Obama is just bringing about the end of days?!

Now lets take the next step.

WHO caused those conflicts at the end of days?

Let me help you.

Satan and his lieutenant, the anti-Christ!

Which one are you claiming that Obama is?

Hint: Neither one is a very good option.

But then neither is Lt. Obama!

ROTFL



[Edited by: AnotherOne at 8/15/2014 4:18:55 PM EST]
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 4:05:03 PM

"Is the world a safer place, the Middle East more stable,"


And that is a believer asking this?

Doesn't the bible say that there will be MORE wars and rumors of wars towards the end of days? So how can you ask is the world a safer place?

Doesn't the bible teach that Israel will be surrounded by enemies before God moves in a big way to defend it? So how can you ask is the middle east more stable?

Again, the only person who will be promising peace over there in that region is the Anti-Christ...

And you say I'm suggesting blasphemy for realizing that in a free nation, people can choose to believe the bible or not?

Um, you might want to review Daniel and Revelations again.

SMH
Profile Pic
no1doc
Champion Author Milwaukee

Posts:28,888
Points:2,380,270
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 3:32:58 PM

Thanks for that link I75at7AM.

Some of Joe's points from the link:

"From where I’m standing, the party has largely abandoned its commitment to civil rights and instead allows race-baiters to be national power brokers. As spokesman for the Boys and Girls Clubs of New Jersey, I am hurt that there is not one Democrat in Washington who cares enough about the great inner cities of this country to help those in dire distress from poverty and crime. These cities are in worse shape than those countries from which all those illegal “children” crossing our borders daily are coming.

In my home state, if I can walk the streets of Camden to try to help the disenfranchised, why can’t the Democrat in the White House walk the South Side of his hometown and do the same? In terms of caring for the working class, it seems as though Democrats are more interested in catering to the special interests, such as the trial lawyers, lobbyists and George Soros who fund their campaigns — rather than fighting for small-business relief to allow a higher minimum wage or (God forbid) middle-class tax relief.

Most disheartening, though, is the Democrats’ weak commitment to a strong defense and maintaining America’s place in the world as the only superpower. All I see is an American foreign policy led by a Democratic administration that is floundering when it comes to things like dealing with Iraq, Russia and Syria, inept when it comes to crises like Benghazi, and weak at the knees when it comes to protecting our strongest Middle Eastern ally, Israel."
...

Is the world a safer place, the Middle East more stable, or America more respected today compared to 6 years ago?
Profile Pic
I75at7AM
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:73,840
Points:3,037,720
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 2:07:56 PM

It is time for Joe Piscopo to leave the Democrat Party.

Because it already left him.
Profile Pic
RNorm
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:53,071
Points:1,266,575
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 15, 2014 1:36:23 PM

"Again, you accuse me of an "insult."


Again, you falsely accuse me of theology that I've never espoused herein or elsewhere.

I simply point out the fact that people have the freedom to believe or not to believe in God. That is how things work in a free society. And understanding that fact has nothing to do with what I believe or my theology...a rational and informed person would know that.

Always assuming that my understanding that people are free to choose whether or not to believe or not to believe means that I do not believe is simply flawed and irrational thinking.

*ROTFL*
Post a reply Back to Topics