Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    4:38 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: US politics > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Legalize Marijuana? Back to Topics
ldheinz

Champion Author
Chicago

Posts:22,628
Points:2,805,985
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Apr 1, 2010 5:17:33 AM

This topic is for a discussion on whether or not Marijuana should be legalized.
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 25, 2014 4:09:42 PM

theTower "Spare me the innocence routine."

Ah, so:

"What part of ... didn't quite get past the vision center and into the brain?" and "Get a freakin grip."

are just terms of endearment?

I'm hardly practicing an "innocence routine" to point out your abusive rhetoric.

But that's what's so amazing about conservatives. They dish out insult after insult after insult, and yet they're always the first ones to complain about it if anybody gives them back in kind.

Profile Pic
theTower
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:14,851
Points:517,505
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jul 25, 2014 4:03:23 PM

"ornery, mean s.o.b. you are with people"

Oh please.
Spare me the innocence routine.
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:27,175
Points:2,654,875
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 25, 2014 12:44:15 PM

fueluser10 - "If a society as a whole wants to maybe better itself, (That very sentence is why laws were passed in the first place.) then legalizing illegal substances is not a answer.. its a crutch."

Except that all of the available evidence points to the current laws on marijuana harming society rather than bettering it.

So why, exactly, do you support laws that harm society?
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 25, 2014 11:52:04 AM

So just another reiteration of your standard "the law is the law" talking point eh Eff-you?

It appears that you think that lawmakers never make mistakes and are never influenced by political motives to pass a law that isn't really based on facts or in the best interests of society and the nation.

Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 25, 2014 11:45:50 AM

If a society as a whole wants to maybe better itself, (That very sentence is why laws were passed in the first place.) then legalizing illegal substances is not a answer.. its a crutch.
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 25, 2014 7:45:37 AM

You didn't really make it clear that you had any point to make. It's hardly as if it's a secret that some people are mooches. Some of them are even conservatives although you'd never know it from the way conservatives talk about others.

But thanks for making it clear in your response what an ornery, mean s.o.b. you are with people. You're such a credit to the conservative ethos.
Profile Pic
El_Gato_Negro
Champion Author Miami

Posts:3,324
Points:618,105
Joined:Nov 2012
Message Posted: Jul 24, 2014 8:25:30 AM

.

[Edited by: El_Gato_Negro at 7/24/2014 8:28:31 AM EST]
Profile Pic
theTower
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:14,851
Points:517,505
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jul 23, 2014 6:26:42 PM

"Do you really think that’s a reason not to legalize marijuana, because a couple of welfare bums might use it?"

Do you really think you need to imply thats what I said?
What part of "I'm all for legalization and everything" didn't quite get past the vision center and into the brain?
I actullly just posted it so I could draw a comparison to the weed moochers that were always around.
I thought the whole thing was funny that in a round about way I still have people mooching weed off of me years after I quit smoking it.
Get a freakin grip.

[Edited by: theTower at 7/23/2014 6:27:58 PM EST]
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:27,175
Points:2,654,875
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 23, 2014 5:44:27 PM

theTower - "At least 259 times in the first six months of legalized recreational marijuana in Colorado, beneficiaries used their electronic-benefit transfer (EBT) cards to access public assistance at weed retailers and dispensaries" out of half a million EBT withdrawals in the same period.

And according to the article, some of those "weed retailers and dispensaries" also sell groceries.
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 23, 2014 10:32:45 AM

You’re right theTower. I’m sure nobody needed a news article to tell them that some welfare recipients use their money for non-necessities.

If they weren’t using it to buy marijuana, then they’d be buying booze or cigarettes, or perhaps soda, potato chips and Cheezies. Whatever it is that the average taxpayer has a bee in their bonnet about at any given time.

No matter what it is, there will ALWAYS be some people who abuse the system.

But 259 times in 6 months works out to about 43 times a months, or 10 times a week. That could be as little as 2 people buying some weed once a day.

Is it really something to get worked up about?

Do you really think that’s a reason not to legalize marijuana, because a couple of welfare bums might use it?

In the whole scheme of things, there's more important things to worry about.
Profile Pic
theTower
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:14,851
Points:517,505
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jul 23, 2014 6:27:39 AM

I'm all for legalization and everything, but somehow I kind of new this would happen.
Welfare Cash for Weed in Colorado

"At least 259 times in the first six months of legalized recreational marijuana in Colorado, beneficiaries used their electronic-benefit transfer (EBT) cards to access public assistance at weed retailers and dispensaries, withdrawing a total of $23,608.53 in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash, NRO’s examination found"

Like I used to tell my buds back in the day who always wanted to mooch free weed from me. "Buy your own damn pot"



[Edited by: theTower at 7/23/2014 6:28:49 AM EST]
Profile Pic
SemiSteve
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:18,505
Points:368,620
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Jul 22, 2014 1:33:17 PM

"A police officer enforcing the law in regards to cannabis is causing someone harm?"

Yes. More than not. Take a hard-working tax-paying family-supporting individual who exercises the freedom to enjoy cannabis and ruin that person's life by causing them significant expense, loss of employment, and incarceration; and yes, harm has been caused not only to their own life, but to others whom may depend on him.

Harm is caused to the person arrested and the family which depends on him. Harm is caused to society to pay the taxes which pay for law enforcement, court proceedings, and incarceration. Harm is caused to those who are not being protected from violent crime by law enforcement because they are busy doing pot busts. Harm is cause to the employer of the busted person because that job will go undone until a suitable replacement can be found.

Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 1:51:23 PM

I don't know if it will ever prevent any diseases PO, but it's possible.

At the very least it will treat diseases and mitigate the suffering of people with chronic and terminal diseases.
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 1:49:01 PM

"Making pot, and other drugs, illegal has just made them harder to control."

You can see how well that worked out with Prohibition. It basically created organized crime and resulted in general disrespect for police authority, flouting of the law and a total loss of control over alcohol.

It wasn't until alcohol was re-legalized that it was possible to control it, and then start to make tax money from it.

Profile Pic
PithyOpiner
Champion Author Stockton

Posts:18,087
Points:1,931,575
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 1:48:01 PM

Sure, legalize it. Maybe we'll find that smoked over a period of time it will prevent some diseases.
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:27,175
Points:2,654,875
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 1:30:52 PM

BuzzLOL - ". I've seen too many people's lives ruined by drugs to want anything beyond alcohol legal..."

Making pot, and other drugs, illegal has just made them harder to control.
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 8:12:17 AM

Ohio teen dies from caffeine overdose

"An autopsy found that Stiner had a lethal amount of caffeine in his system when he died May 27 (2014) at his home in LaGrange, Ohio, southwest of Cleveland."

So much for that person who insists that marijuana is so much more dangerous than caffeine.

Teens these days are looking for caffeine highs with high caffeine drinks and powders. It can be fatal.

Has anybody heard of a fatal marijuana overdose? Anywhere in history?
Profile Pic
ldheinz
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:22,628
Points:2,805,985
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 5:54:34 AM

So you think that making something illegal makes it go away? So nobody has been using marijuana? Besides, pot is milder than alcohol.
Profile Pic
BuzzLOL
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:3,464
Points:48,825
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 5:27:29 AM

. I've seen too many people's lives ruined by drugs to want anything beyond alcohol legal...
Profile Pic
ldheinz
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:22,628
Points:2,805,985
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 3:23:58 AM

New questions, but still no answers from FU....
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:27,175
Points:2,654,875
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 12:26:54 AM

fueluser10 - "rjhenn: Are you in this topic forum to Bogart and push answers away that I guess doesn't float your boat of wanted reasoning?"

Accusing others of doing what you do?

"Laws are protecting society, if they were not doing as they were intended then why isn't society in a state of chaos right now?"

If marijuana laws are protecting society, why is it so easy for children to get marijuana? Why are so many people being killed because of the illegal drug trade?

"Going by the words that you used.. A police officer enforcing the law in regards to cannabis is causing someone harm?"

Possibly. You haven't read of people being killed by police when they storm the wrong address on a drug bust?

"How about creating a topic forum that mentions the laws that are hindering society and see what the rest of the website thinks about them."

Isn't this topic about one set of laws that's "hindering" society?

"And if a worker at any job is smoking weed before work or during work, that kind of crap makes sense? GOOD customer service whether medical or retail trumps smoking weed."

No better or worse than being drunk while working.

"People want to have trust in who is taking care of them.. not to walk around with worry in the back of their minds about who might be high and taking care of them while a drug like cannabis affecting them in whatever manner that it might."

If you think that none of those who are "taking care of you" aren't using drugs, including alcohol, you're even more ignorant than you appear to be.

"See the first Pandora's box being opened was legalizing alcohol and its continued affect on society."

You don't seem to be aware that alcohol was legal before Prohibition, or of the problems that Prohibition caused. Much like the problems our current drug laws are causing.
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:22,287
Points:4,110,830
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 12:03:39 PM

FU: “We're about to get into a verbal game of philosophical view points that is going to lead to an extending of another year past the five already on the books about this very topic.”

Agreed, I may need to go back to ignoring your posts.

FU: “The taxation of weed is trumped by the way taxation is spent in the country for it seems to be all part of the same tired math.”

It’s a separate issue. Let’s at least agree to reduce expenses with legalization.

FU: “So the legalization equates to poor choice making? Imagine if the legalization of alcohol didn't take place. Then maybe those poor choices would not have been made in the first place? Or they were made still from the back door or an illegal alcohol transaction in which a poor choice was still hypothetically made.”

No, poor choices will always be made by irresponsible people/parents/kids. There’s another topic: How to promote responsible people/parents/kids.

Your bible tells you that you will live with temptation. True that—temptation abounds. You will not eliminate temptation. You will not eliminate drugs/alcohol by making it illegal. Strong people live with temptation and make responsible choices. Let’s make people strong instead. Let’s educate people and raise kids responsibly.
Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 11:44:30 AM

Panda: We're about to get into a verbal game of philosophical view points that is going to lead to an extending of another year past the five already on the books about this very topic.
The taxation of weed is trumped by the way taxation is spent in the country for it seems to be all part of the same tired math.
So the legalization equates to poor choice making? Imagine if the legalization of alcohol didn't take place. Then maybe those poor choices would not have been made in the first place?
Or they were made still from the back door or an illegal alcohol transaction in which a poor choice was still hypothetically made.
Maybe society deserves better?
Choices made are a matter of individualized perception of how some may or may not choose to view a law.
Being responsible is fairness to oneself while being irresponsible is maybe an individual unfair to oneself.

[Edited by: fueluser10 at 7/20/2014 11:46:00 AM EST]
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:22,287
Points:4,110,830
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 11:06:03 AM

FU: “Some are going to waste taxation funds with or without a budget. (IE pork barrel spending.)”

Of course, separate issue—another topic.

FU: “So why not fix the issues that have been lingering around now for decades that need taxation as its constructive backbone?”

Not what I said. I said spend less, i.e. reduce expense by legalization.

FU: “Legalizing alcohol created taxation profits. Poor outcome teenagers binge drinking and people driving on the roads drunk and causing possibly tragic accidents.”

Again—these are poor choices by consumers. Stay up late and pay the price.

You say pro-prohibition, but it is more expensive to go after underground sales and consumption as we see now with underground drug cartel.

FU: “See the first Pandora's box being opened was legalizing alcohol and its continued affect on society. Now we are playing around with the second Pandora's box called legalizing weed and some of us don't think that its not going to have an affect on society as well?”

The temptation will always exist whether it’s legal or illegal. The choice is using it responsibly or irresponsibly. Making or keeping it illegal increases costs to society.

Responsible people/parents/kids make responsible choices, period.

Irresponsible people/parents/kids make irresponsible choices, period.
Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 10:10:13 AM

Panda: Some are going to waste taxation funds with or without a budget. (IE pork barrel spending.)
And no, alcohol and weed taxation isn't going to alone fix the issues that are messing with this country of ours.
So why not fix the issues that have been lingering around now for decades that need taxation as its constructive backbone?
The answers I'm fairly sure are there and available to be indulged in but for some reason we get lip service as an answer instead of a utilized answer taking care of a problem in the first place.
The lesser of two evils. Legalizing alcohol created taxation profits. Poor outcome teenagers binge drinking and people driving on the roads drunk and causing possibly tragic accidents.
Partially legalized weed to maybe fully legalizing weed: Another taxation profit machine device created. The outcome.. lord knows how that is going to work itself out.
That ideal is like putting the train before the railroad tracks and then complaining that the train isn't going fast enough for some as they want it to.
See the first Pandora's box being opened was legalizing alcohol and its continued affect on society.
Now we are playing around with the second Pandora's box called legalizing weed and some of us don't think that its not going to have an affect on society as well?
According to some its already going on.

[Edited by: fueluser10 at 7/20/2014 10:15:50 AM EST]
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:22,287
Points:4,110,830
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 9:28:06 AM

FU: “And if a worker at any job is smoking weed before work or during work, that kind of crap makes sense?”

That’s a poor choice Fuel—it has nothing to do with legalizing pot (or legalized alcohol).

WISE choices: Don’t drink and drive, don’t toke on the job, get a good nights rest.

POOR choices: Drink on the job, toke and drive, stay up all night before work.
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:22,287
Points:4,110,830
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 9:17:50 AM

FU: “I have said this before.. those whom are responsible for taxation funds maybe ought not waste money via spending more then is being taken in. 17 Trillion plus now and growing in debt. Poor ole alcohol taxation I guess just can't be depended on to make much of a difference now either now can it?”

So why not reduce the budget by eliminating law enforcement and incarceration of dope sales and use?

And why is it that alcohol/hemp sales tax can’t make a difference? You can’t expect one tax to solve the debt problem, but it can offset the cost of enforcing lawful use.
Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 4:07:18 AM

rjhenn: Are you in this topic forum to Bogart and push answers away that I guess doesn't float your boat of wanted reasoning?
You and others seemingly love to push the words "babble," "straw man," and "red herring" like they were topic forum curse words.
Laws are protecting society, if they were not doing as they were intended then why isn't society in a state of chaos right now?
Going by the words that you used.. A police officer enforcing the law in regards to cannabis is causing someone harm?
And do you know what I am benefiting from? The education that I am getting from your words and the ones expressed that are similar to yours.
How about creating a topic forum that mentions the laws that are hindering society and see what the rest of the website thinks about them.
And if a worker at any job is smoking weed before work or during work, that kind of crap makes sense? GOOD customer service whether medical or retail trumps smoking weed.
People want to have trust in who is taking care of them.. not to walk around with worry in the back of their minds about who might be high and taking care of them while a drug like cannabis affecting them in whatever manner that it might.

[Edited by: fueluser10 at 7/20/2014 4:15:04 AM EST]
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:27,175
Points:2,654,875
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 1:37:44 AM

fueluser10 - "My answer return answer to your question: I don't have an issue with the law banning weed."

Which doesn't answer anything.

"If I had a teenager who was growing up in the different currents of "trendy" thoughts that are seemingly molding society today via this pocket of thought or that pocket of thought like legalizing cannabis."

Followed by more meaningless babble.

"I have no disagreements with the laws that give society the benefit of doubt when the laws are created to protect society."

Except that, as pointed out many times, those laws aren't protecting society. In fact, they're doing far more harm than good.

Which implies that you somehow benefit from that harm.
Profile Pic
ldheinz
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:22,628
Points:2,805,985
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 11:41:06 PM

In Colorado demand is significantly exceeding supply. That will change.
Profile Pic
SemiSteve
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:18,505
Points:368,620
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 10:37:54 PM

Doctors smoke it. Nurses smoke it. Lawyers smoke it. Judges, too. Many very successful people enjoy it. It is absurd to keep it illegal. It makes a mockery of our justice system to even have to deal with it.
Profile Pic
El_Gato_Negro
Champion Author Miami

Posts:3,324
Points:618,105
Joined:Nov 2012
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 9:06:28 PM

You know the price before and after on the other side of the country?
Profile Pic
Bell30012
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:4,522
Points:692,510
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 7:12:18 PM

Why isn't the price of weed going down in Colorado? It's legal now.
Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 3:23:41 PM

rjhenn: I'm a citizen of society just as you are and nothing more.
My answer return answer to your question: I don't have an issue with the law banning weed.
If I had a teenager who was growing up in the different currents of "trendy" thoughts that are seemingly molding society today via this pocket of thought or that pocket of thought like legalizing cannabis.
And I'd have one train of thought for them. SEE how far you get when you start following in the steps of your friends whom think that they are maybe smarter then their families or the authorities are.
If you want to be fair to yourself then don't fool around with weed.
I have no disagreements with the laws that give society the benefit of doubt when the laws are created to protect society.
Panda: I have said this before.. those whom are responsible for taxation funds maybe ought not waste money via spending more then is being taken in. 17 Trillion plus now and growing in debt. Poor ole alcohol taxation I guess just can't be depended on to make much of a difference now either now can it?

[Edited by: fueluser10 at 7/19/2014 3:29:03 PM EST]
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:27,175
Points:2,654,875
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 1:39:06 PM

fueluser10 - "What I'm posting doesn't make sense.."

Not usually.

"Smoking weed can't get a person into trouble with the law? So what is nonsensical to you, breaking the law or not breaking the law?"

Except that's not what you said. What you said was: "It's like he is suggesting that if if wasn't illegal then no one would have gotten into trouble for using the stuff." As I said, there doesn't appear to have been any valid reason for making cannabis illegal in the first place. So why is it still illegal?

"Let me ask you a question: Should society base it's laws on how you feel about cannabis being illegal? And would it be fair to the rest of society based upon how you felt via your view of how the law should be defined? Would you be speaking for society as a whole or just pockets of society?"

The law on marijuana isn't keeping people from using it. In fact, probably more people have access to it and use it because it's illegal.

Let me ask the question back: Should society base its laws on how you feel about cannabis being legal, or should it look at the actual effects of it being illegal? Which would do more net good to society?

Exactly why do you oppose making pot legal? Are you a dealer, making money off of the current law?
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:22,287
Points:4,110,830
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 11:03:03 AM

=> FU: "Skip the munchie chasing and go for a walk and give the sofa and couch a break."

I walk ~3 miles almost every day Fuel. Now what is the harm in a little popcorn?

I won't use mj or smoke, but why should we spend so much money to keep mj illegal? People can choose to use responsibly, and if not, create consequences that are less expensive to enforce.
Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 10:44:05 AM

rjhenn: What I'm posting doesn't make sense.. Smoking weed can't get a person into trouble with the law? So what is nonsensical to you, breaking the law or not breaking the law?
Let me ask you a question: Should society base it's laws on how you feel about cannabis being illegal? And would it be fair to the rest of society based upon how you felt via your view of how the law should be defined? Would you be speaking for society as a whole or just pockets of society?

[Edited by: fueluser10 at 7/19/2014 10:52:57 AM EST]
Profile Pic
SE3.5
Champion Author Indianapolis

Posts:22,104
Points:3,617,390
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 9:31:09 AM

"But the difference is that cannabis is used directly as the plant."

Peyote?
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:22,287
Points:4,110,830
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 9:28:31 AM

Enforce boundaries for second-hand smoke and driving while impaired laws--tax sales and use fines to offset the cost of enforcing reasonable laws.

I’ll be just fine without mj (among other substances) but I recognize medical benefits. We can learn to make good and bad choices without laws (e.g. assigning designated drivers), and we need consequences when bad choices harm others.

Okay, pass the popcorn SSteve. ;)
Profile Pic
SemiSteve
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:18,505
Points:368,620
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2014 8:45:58 AM

There is no equivalent in cannabis to a drunken brawl.

Maybe just a giggle fest with the munchies.
Profile Pic
Weaslespit
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:14,672
Points:504,365
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 1:42:46 PM

"Cannabis doesn't even belong on a drug list. It is a naturally growing plant.

--Beg pardon, but so are the poppies that are used to produce opium - from which heroin is derived. So is the coca plant, from which cocaine is derived."

I agree, that is not great reasoning at face value but it does bear our as BT explained. The point, however, is correct. Marijuana should not be a schedule 1 drug. At worst, it is a schedule 4. I consider it less harmful than alcohol...
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 1:38:44 PM

"Cannabis doesn't even belong on a drug list. It is a naturally growing plant."

"--Beg pardon, but so are the poppies that are used to produce opium - from which heroin is derived. So is the coca plant, from which cocaine is derived."

That was my immediate thought when I saw the comment too.

But the difference is that cannabis is used directly as the plant. It's just dried and shredded like tobacco.

OTOH, heroin, cocaine etc. has to be extracted and processed to get the drug, which is a more involved process than just letting it dry and it's ready to use.

If you want to really go into, there are thousands of legal drugs originally derived from plant material (Coumadin and Aspirin for example) but all of them are significantly more processed than cannabis.
Profile Pic
AC-302
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:30,000
Points:3,314,120
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 1:26:59 PM

"Cannabis doesn't even belong on a drug list. It is a naturally growing plant."

--Beg pardon, but so are the poppies that are used to produce opium - from which heroin is derived. So is the coca plant, from which cocaine is derived.
Profile Pic
AC-302
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:30,000
Points:3,314,120
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 1:24:05 PM

"Even if we take every 'Reefer Madness' allegation at face value, prohibition of marijuana has caused more harm than the drug ever could.."

--William F. Buckley Jr.
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:27,175
Points:2,654,875
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 12:40:38 PM

fueluser10 - "Let me answer the QUESTION that is that premise of this topic forum. Legalizing cannabis would be like enabling excuses for the sake of acceptance."

Yet another 'answer' that appears to be meaningless.

"The law states that indulging in cannabis is illegal.. right?
But as rjhenn has mantra'd on about.. cannabis should not have been made illegal in this first place. (BUT the mess is, so I still don't get the use of his mantra when its obviously self contradictory.)"

How can it be self-contradictory when what you're posting doesn't make any sense? Or is this another "the law is the law and cannot be changed or questioned" argument?

"It's like he is suggesting that if if wasn't illegal then no one would have gotten into trouble for using the stuff. But you can't self legalize the stuff then use it when the law states not to use the stuff."

But if it wasn't illegal, then no one would have gotten into legal "trouble for using the stuff". And if it wasn't illegal, then the law wouldn't state not to use the stuff. So your comment, once again, makes no sense.

And is "obviously self contradictory".

"The law is giving society the benefit of doubt. Do some have an issue with society being giving the benefit of legal protection doubt?"

And yet another nonsensical statement. How does promoting a black market that makes some very bad people very rich, and makes drugs easily available to anyone, including children, benefit society?
Profile Pic
midorishonen
Veteran Author Houston

Posts:371
Points:295,205
Joined:Jul 2011
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 10:38:48 AM

FU: You are quite the filibuster.
Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 9:51:32 AM

BT, Idheinz: Elementary conversation piece. The law states that indulging in cannabis is illegal.. right?
But as rjhenn has mantra'd on about.. cannabis should not have been made illegal in this first place. (BUT the mess is, so I still don't get the use of his mantra when its obviously self contradictory.)
It's like he is suggesting that if if wasn't illegal then no one would have gotten into trouble for using the stuff. But you can't self legalize the stuff then use it when the law states not to use the stuff.
What are some of you all looking for in here.. for some to agree with the self legalization angle? It's like someone is rationalizing to themselves that they want to use the stuff but they don't want to get into legal trouble for it?
The law is giving society the benefit of doubt. Do some have an issue with society being giving the benefit of legal protection doubt?
SCAN over what Semisteve?
Maybe the real "programming" that might be going is the slow and methodical pro cannabis talking points reiterating for nearly 5 years now, that could be basically kneading society to grow to the pro cannabis sides way of thinking?

[Edited by: fueluser10 at 7/18/2014 9:56:50 AM EST]
Profile Pic
SemiSteve
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:18,505
Points:368,620
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 8:23:05 AM

By now there is little point in actually try to read and respond to one of those grammar-challenged posts. You know what's in it before you even begin. Same old bot-spew.

Just briefly scan over it and you've gotten as much as can be understood. Ya know it is just going to be more of the same phrases forced into incomprehensible 'sentences.'
Profile Pic
BabeTruth
Champion Author New York

Posts:4,424
Points:597,275
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 7:41:58 AM

So you ask us questions and expect answers, but you refuse to answer ANY of ours? You owe us hundreds of answers before we respond to any of yours. But, of course, you don't answer questions, because you can't, right?

A human would be able to read our posts quite easily eff-yew. Every one of the other 'people' on this thread have been able to read them and duplicate the kind of post. So what's your problem?

Why don't you start acting like a human who really wants to debate? That would include answering our questions.

If you can't answer questions as well as ask them, then perhaps you're not human. Your question is an easy one to answer, but if you rudely ignore all our questions, then I guess you'll never get the answer.

Did you google 'natural cannabinoids' yet?


[Edited by: BabeTruth at 7/18/2014 7:42:46 AM EST]
Profile Pic
fueluser10
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:2,971
Points:69,425
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 7:02:17 AM

OK there BT then if we have natural cannabiniods in our bodies already.. then what is the point of getting high?
And what is an "eff-yew" BT?
Because Mr. IT isn't reading your non word usage very well there Professor Silly mouth.
Post a reply Back to Topics