Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    11:24 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Daily News Article Discussions > Topics Add to favorite topics  
Author Topic: An Ethical Dilemma: When Robot Cars Must kill, Who Should Pick the Victim? Back to Topics
dallfo

Champion Author
Denver

Posts:2,341
Points:436,025
Joined:Oct 2013
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 12:43:40 AM

We are moving closer to having driverless cars on roads everywhere, and naturally, people are starting to wonder what kinds of ethical challenges driverless cars will pose. One of those challenges is choosing how a driverless car should react when faced with an unavoidable crash scenario. Indeed, that topic has been featured in many of the major media outlets of late. Surprisingly little debate, however, has addressed who should decide how a driverless car should react in those scenarios. This who question is of critical importance if we are to design cars that are trustworthy and ethical.

Driverless cars stand to reduce the number of driving fatalities overall. But there will still be fatal car crashes that are unavoidable. For example, consider this scenario in illustration, a sort of m
Visit Real Clear Technology.com for full article
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
lorimarie36
Champion Author New York

Posts:1,226
Points:269,235
Joined:Sep 2013
Message Posted: Jun 17, 2014 3:37:07 AM

Post something new please.
Profile Pic
lorimarie36
Champion Author New York

Posts:1,226
Points:269,235
Joined:Sep 2013
Message Posted: Jun 16, 2014 1:15:41 AM

What does the car sensors actually see?
Profile Pic
gasmask78
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:4,398
Points:955,905
Joined:Sep 2011
Message Posted: Jun 16, 2014 12:13:24 AM

hmm...
Profile Pic
MAC48
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:3,408
Points:1,321,730
Joined:Dec 2006
Message Posted: Jun 15, 2014 7:36:15 PM

If one really expects robot vehicles to one day be legal on our streets and highways, then the order of the liability for any damages and wrongful death caused during the robotic operation of the vehicle to third parties, to third party property, to the occupants of the robotic vehicle or to the property of the occupants of the robotic vehicle should be assessed in the following order:

1) The robot vehicle manufacturer,
2) The state that allowed or allows robot vehicles to legally drive,
3) The manufacturer of the robot vehicle computer processing hardware,
4) The manufacturer of the robot vehicle sensing hardware, and
5) The robotic vehicle computer programmer.

In any accident in which a robot vehicle due to its operation in a robotic state is the vehicle found to be at fault, a failure of one or more of the above parties has simply got to be the reason for the accident.

The human occupant or occupants of a robot vehicle should not have any liability unless it can be proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that with unassailable scientific evidence that the robot vehicle was NOT in any form or fashion in a state of robotic operation for a period of five minutes prior to the accident.
Profile Pic
remay
Champion Author Houston

Posts:9,393
Points:2,720,115
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Jun 15, 2014 4:22:26 PM

Don't let GM into the picture...
Profile Pic
DrCashFlow
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:9,587
Points:2,222,085
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Jun 15, 2014 4:12:45 PM

Lawyers are drooling
Profile Pic
WVUtailgater
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:11,068
Points:2,311,950
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Jun 15, 2014 9:32:07 AM

I will always drive my car.
Profile Pic
MadFueler
Champion Author Winston-Salem

Posts:3,866
Points:785,995
Joined:Sep 2012
Message Posted: Jun 15, 2014 8:06:14 AM

This scenario also poses another dilemma: If either the designer or the driver decides ahead of time to hit the child, are they guilty of murder or liable for wrongful death? On several levels, I wouldn't trust this to a machine, unless the machine were able to see the danger before I would and find a way to stage the inevitable collision in such a way that a fatality would be less likely.

fuel2use "Gas prices."

No, cars and safety - legitimate topic per GB article guidelines.
Profile Pic
BBopp
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:9,180
Points:2,477,450
Joined:Dec 2006
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:44:40 PM

The natural human instinct is self preservation or preservation of one's family.
Profile Pic
fuel2use
Champion Author Seattle

Posts:5,557
Points:1,245,150
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 3:45:43 PM

Gas prices.
Profile Pic
bondo
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:6,072
Points:1,371,130
Joined:May 2001
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 1:17:10 PM

Dark news.
Profile Pic
bar1035
Champion Author Charlotte

Posts:12,884
Points:1,911,545
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 12:53:12 PM

If it immediately imploded into tiny pieces at least we should survive since we are not the ones with that car.

[Edited by: bar1035 at 6/14/2014 12:53:57 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Metrolizer
Champion Author Fort Worth

Posts:2,417
Points:2,703,090
Joined:Feb 2005
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 12:50:31 PM


Disturbing the hypotheses of the hypothetical scenario, there is a speed at which the car would kill the child but at which the driver would escape unscathed or little damaged, if the car ran itself into the embankment.

This is an interesting topic. I agree with Jason Millar that technicians should not be making ethical choices that drivers can make.

I also agree with NilesBishop that the default bias is for self-preservation. Nikontraveler gives one reason. The "child" that a sensor may have detected could turn out to have been a bag of groceries in a baby stroller, a goat, or a rabid dog.
Profile Pic
livedream
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:6,509
Points:1,364,570
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 12:39:20 PM

The dark side of driverless cars. Not a choice I would make.
Profile Pic
Nikontraveler
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:2,032
Points:1,094,565
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 11:29:14 AM

This is an interesting question. Do driverless cars recognize animals like deer, cats, dogs OR Little children?
Profile Pic
NilesBishop
Champion Author Philadelphia

Posts:2,410
Points:575,815
Joined:Feb 2013
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 11:04:30 AM

Question is actually fairly simple. What would an EXPERIENCED driver do. An experienced driver would slow the car down as rapidly as possible by jamming on the brakes. If there is not enough stopping distance the poor unfortunate child dies.

In a more obvious situation, Mountain Road, steep cliff on right mountain wall on side. Same child. NO ONE would ethically expect the driver to drive off the cliff to save the life of the child.

And lastly the cars by them will be smart enough to determine WHO is either in the driver seat and who is the pedestrian and score them accordingly with lawyers, of course, at the bottom. (Removing tongue from cheek on that last comment).
Profile Pic
jcotaxi
Champion Author South Bend

Posts:3,297
Points:683,930
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:54:18 AM

Just wait till a robot car exhibits road rage! Will they do it perfectly and get away with it?
Profile Pic
lorimarie36
Champion Author New York

Posts:1,226
Points:269,235
Joined:Sep 2013
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:38:35 AM

Interesting scenario. Will the car be able to determine what the obstruction is in front of the car? Maybe it's a branch, so will the car crash into the wall to save a branch? Interesting.
Profile Pic
Cellsite
Champion Author Appleton

Posts:3,362
Points:788,885
Joined:Jun 2012
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:27:05 AM

If the car was so smart, it should have known to slow way down when approaching this type of scenario.
Profile Pic
cableman31
Champion Author New York

Posts:10,787
Points:2,481,545
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:11:57 AM

With the way people drive today, driverless car just could be an answer.
Profile Pic
teatiger
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:5,310
Points:2,088,240
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:11:36 AM

Sad
Profile Pic
biza4u
Champion Author New Haven

Posts:11,133
Points:2,235,630
Joined:Jan 2007
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:10:54 AM

Ok
Profile Pic
FocusFree
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:2,847
Points:1,547,455
Joined:Dec 2009
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:10:27 AM

An interesting concept.
Profile Pic
mikesr100
Champion Author Sacramento

Posts:6,544
Points:1,694,040
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:10:26 AM

The State that Licensed them to Drive?
Profile Pic
VB_Richard
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:4,280
Points:966,620
Joined:Dec 2011
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:09:02 AM

Foresight is good when no one has control, who is responsible?
Profile Pic
AmtechJim
Champion Author Gary

Posts:1,187
Points:667,265
Joined:Sep 2012
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:08:57 AM

Interesting questions, I do not believe that automated cars are ever going to roam on their own without a manual override. These are best left to special high speed highways just for them as a form a personal public transportation where they only have to deal with each other of the same type and can be orchestrated with an overall master control. Time will tell.
Profile Pic
bjdorval
Champion Author Quebec

Posts:4,872
Points:1,744,775
Joined:Jul 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:08:55 AM

Will a driverless car stop in the middle of a busy highway for ducks?
Profile Pic
wegman
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:10,307
Points:2,689,410
Joined:Jun 2001
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:08:44 AM

Interesting and depressing. I STILL want the technology sooner rather than later.
Profile Pic
PizzaMon
Champion Author Philadelphia

Posts:6,577
Points:2,443,565
Joined:Jun 2006
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:08:11 AM

Not in my lifetime.
Profile Pic
THEDodgeman
Champion Author Denver

Posts:10,644
Points:2,559,825
Joined:Apr 2005
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:07:57 AM

ok
Profile Pic
mfgendron
Champion Author New York

Posts:2,939
Points:837,165
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:07:21 AM

Blame it on W.
Profile Pic
matthwbar
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:6,547
Points:1,618,820
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:07:21 AM

I'll be driving...
Profile Pic
scrossi
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:6,509
Points:1,656,190
Joined:Dec 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:07:14 AM

Me too arwarrior.
Profile Pic
Calbo1
Champion Author Las Vegas

Posts:1,683
Points:1,173,860
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:07:03 AM

I don't think so, I'd rather be the one driving the car
Profile Pic
mpsan
Champion Author Wisconsin

Posts:11,485
Points:2,603,790
Joined:Mar 2007
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:06:33 AM

ok
Profile Pic
arwarrior
All-Star Author Colorado

Posts:613
Points:965,825
Joined:Dec 2011
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:05:19 AM

I'll drive myself
Profile Pic
CliffW
Champion Author Washington

Posts:2,565
Points:3,271,815
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:04:49 AM

I think I'd rather be the one to make the decision by NOT driving an automated car.
Profile Pic
Hugo40
Champion Author Kentucky

Posts:10,220
Points:2,219,435
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:04:40 AM

Driverless vehicles have no heart or feeling.
Profile Pic
GasPriceHelp4u
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:5,331
Points:1,182,125
Joined:Jul 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:03:56 AM

You tell us!!!
Profile Pic
Smartywife
Champion Author Medford

Posts:2,402
Points:697,770
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:03:49 AM

We should be in control of the car.
Profile Pic
AFSANDCOP
All-Star Author Georgia

Posts:629
Points:189,375
Joined:May 2014
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:02:45 AM

ok
Profile Pic
BlueOnyx
All-Star Author Georgia

Posts:768
Points:1,563,590
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:02:17 AM

Stupid scenario. The robo-car should be programmed to react the way a driver would. I don't know about you, but if I saw a kid, unaccompanied by a parent (presumably), on the side of the road, I would slow down as I approached. If the kid suddenly darted out, I'd have time to stop, thus sparing both lives. Why shouldn't the car be programmed to do the same?
Profile Pic
TxMtb
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:4,024
Points:940,455
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:00:28 AM

The car should have detected the child on the side of the road to start with.
Profile Pic
skye1212
Champion Author Austin

Posts:6,102
Points:649,350
Joined:Feb 2013
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:00:18 AM

Can it be worse than being run over by a teenager texting? I'll take the robot cars any day.
Profile Pic
TWS658
Champion Author Portland

Posts:6,114
Points:1,351,100
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 10:00:05 AM

Wow!!!
Profile Pic
GGAlbo
Champion Author Detroit

Posts:4,427
Points:2,469,460
Joined:Sep 2006
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 9:58:27 AM

Whooo!!
Profile Pic
BlueVanGroup
Champion Author Fort Collins

Posts:10,307
Points:2,131,430
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 9:58:21 AM


"I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
Profile Pic
LuckyLou1
Champion Author Colorado

Posts:3,090
Points:792,510
Joined:Oct 2012
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 9:58:17 AM

I won't be having one drive for me
Profile Pic
1JoeBob
Sophomore Author Florida

Posts:158
Points:2,250,760
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 9:58:17 AM

What happens when 2 Robot cars are about to crash each other?
Profile Pic
liao
Champion Author Montreal

Posts:6,019
Points:2,021,560
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Jun 14, 2014 9:57:57 AM

Good question and difficult to find an answer.
Post a reply Back to Topics