Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    6:41 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Daily News Article Discussions > Topics Add to favorite topics  
Author Topic: Coal: the cleanest energy source there is? Back to Topics
osu1
Veteran Author
Ohio

Posts:251
Points:1,810,520
Joined:Sep 2006
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 6:52:37 PM

Researchers have discovered a stunning new process that takes the energy from coal without burning it -- and removes virtually all of the pollution.

The clean coal technique was developed by scientists at The Ohio State University, with just $5 million in funding from the federal government, and took 15 years to achieve.

“We’ve been working on this for more than a decade,” Liang-Shih Fan, a chemical engineer and director of OSU’s Clean Coal Research Laboratory, told FoxNews.com, calling it a new energy conversion process. “We found a way to release the heat from coal without burning.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/20/coal-cleanest-energy-source-there-is/#ixzz2LUEBT47I
Visit Fox News for full article
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
SammyAdams
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:6,350
Points:1,560,520
Joined:Nov 2010
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 12:50:12 PM

To: PDQBlues Re: Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 10:47:56 AM (Printed below)

"Fox News: continuing to put lies and falsehoods out as "news"?"

============================================================

I am assuming that you verified this story before making such an audacious assertion. Otherwise some might construe that you were so convinced of a lie that you didn't want to be confused by any facts. Did you verify that this interview NEVER occurred? Or did you personally discuss this with Dr. Fan before determining that there were some errors, misstatements, or some poignant omissions? Or maybe your research in chemical and biomolecular engineering has led you to differing conclusions? Perhaps you can point out just ONE of the "lies and falsehoods" that Fox news has propagated here as "news". I'm certain that you have many, but just select one of the most glaring.

I will be waiting for your reply, but the silence right now is almost deafening.
bigt61
All-Star Author Virginia

Posts:867
Points:228,965
Joined:Jul 2008
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 11:36:19 AM

Dear Lord - several "greenies" will be on suicide-watch today.
PDQBlues
Champion Author San Diego

Posts:10,283
Points:2,218,750
Joined:Jan 2009
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 10:47:56 AM


Fox News: continuing to put lies and falsehoods out as "news"?
DanMtz
Champion Author Oakland

Posts:6,583
Points:2,017,140
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 10:35:17 AM

Great, where is the first power plant going to be built?
bsnort
Champion Author Huntsville

Posts:1,587
Points:861,820
Joined:Aug 2012
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 10:16:23 AM

EPA will find a way to stop it.
SycamoreISU
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:1,271
Points:778,220
Joined:Jan 2012
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 9:44:31 AM

If this can be done large-scale and is cost-effective, bring it on!
mia3bxs
All-Star Author Miami

Posts:517
Points:854,790
Joined:Jul 2011
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 7:26:04 AM

Sounds promising.
millerin
Champion Author Orlando

Posts:5,017
Points:1,189,825
Joined:Jan 2012
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 6:04:39 AM

it was, is & will see in the future
WEB0153
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:3,803
Points:917,135
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 5:28:33 AM

ok
SammyAdams
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:6,350
Points:1,560,520
Joined:Nov 2010
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 1:40:49 AM

P.P.S. There was nothing in the article to intimate that either the DOE or OSU were "exploring the possibility of establishing a start-up company and licensing the process to utilities". If words have any meaning, this was attributed to Dr. Fan. It IS possible that Fan might have been speaking as an agent for either the University or some one else and/or in some other capacity. Because the article didn't delve in that area, it was reasonable to assume that he was speaking about himself.

Further, it did not specify any details about the terms associated with the funding nor any details about remuneration that Dr. Fan might receive. So being "silent" in that regard leaves this open to possible speculation.

I'll remember next time to consult with his liaison in New Hampshire before posting further.
dodsworth
Champion Author Salem

Posts:4,011
Points:1,058,555
Joined:Jul 2012
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 1:30:03 AM

Really...?
iFueler
Champion Author Durham

Posts:76,310
Points:949,400
Joined:Nov 2012
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 1:01:38 AM

interesting
drpepperTX
Champion Author Texas

Posts:14,356
Points:1,521,395
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 12:37:28 AM

And still there are the deniers of clean coal technology.
BennoBlue
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:48,858
Points:2,237,580
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 12:33:18 AM

If it's as good as it sounds, could be a promising way to upgrade coal-burning power plants.

This article from Ohio State University has a bit more technical detail:
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/looping203.htm
NHLiveFree
Champion Author New Hampshire

Posts:14,926
Points:2,378,550
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 12:07:15 AM

Yes VanIsleRover as you now know that the noted coal ash in the hearth and your garden has likely given several of your relatives, and perhaps yourself, cancer and other illnesses from all the toxic heavy metal residues in it!

Good luck!

[Edited by: NHLiveFree at 2/21/2013 12:08:04 AM EST]
NHLiveFree
Champion Author New Hampshire

Posts:14,926
Points:2,378,550
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2013 12:02:23 AM


Some day. This could have happened over 50 years ago if the coal barons had invested a small amount into R&D for this. They were much too busy maximize profits over all this time!

Of course we still get subjectd to the routine whines, rants, and diatribes here no matter what the news.

ps Dr. Fan is not the individual getting any fees or royalties off any benefits and licensing arangements for this technology if it is advanced to the next phase and commercial use. If DOE funded this, the rights are owned by the federal govt. Ohio State U may possibly share in a small percentage of any future royalties.
WanderDan
All-Star Author Dayton

Posts:670
Points:445,635
Joined:Nov 2012
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 11:59:31 PM

points
ExplorerWA
Champion Author Washington

Posts:6,047
Points:1,466,040
Joined:Feb 2011
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 11:59:31 PM

Interesting. We need this to keep those coal fired electric plants running.
andy1024
Champion Author Allentown

Posts:4,865
Points:1,158,440
Joined:Dec 2011
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 11:44:51 PM

Hope that will save the coal industry.
SammyAdams
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:6,350
Points:1,560,520
Joined:Nov 2010
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 11:21:44 PM

From the article: "Meanwhile, Fan is exploring the possibility of establishing a start-up company and licensing the process to utilities, and has the potential to patent 35 different parts of the process."

=============================================================

As an employee of Ohio State University and with funding from the FED to the tune of $5 million buckaroos, I marvel that Dr. Fan feels entitled to the patents stemming from this new process. If he were in the employ of a private company, patents would remain the property of the employer.

Be that as it may, however, you might think that the "greenies" who voice concern for the environment would say "Isn't this marvelous that a new process would make "dirty coal" (Their hypothetical words) compatible for industrial use and environmentally SAFE! (Their hypothetical words, too)". More likely we can expect them to criticize the NEWS SOURCE (Fox News); ostensibly a "conservative" news organ.

Another ploy from the "left" might be to ridicule those who find no favor with using taxpayer funds (e.g. $5 Million from the FED) and at the same time defend the Coal industry in their fight for survival. There's no correlation there, but it does cause them to get "puffed up" with righteous indignation and feel the need to purchase a bigger sombrero. At the same time, they have no problem with giving public funds to Solandra . . . uh, I mean LOANING taxpayer money to a "green" company in pursuit of one of THEIR agenda items. (I used "giving" over "loaning" because when you loan money to a party which never intends to pay it back, it is effectually a GIFT).

Such are the inconsistencies of the liberal mind.

[Edited by: SammyAdams at 2/20/2013 11:26:31 PM EST]
Joeski1
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:13,980
Points:2,515,410
Joined:Dec 2004
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 10:54:10 PM

man... the lies fox propagates....

and they can find folks that believe it....

coal is right behind nuke for being clean...

all ya gotta do is find space for about 1 billion tons of nuke waste...

scattered in 140 different locations across the USA .. and securely ship it to who ever you can find to store it.. and instead of having a 140 problems... you'll just have one big problem

then you can start on coal slurry piles... and mountaintop removal damage....

clean coal is utter non sense...

but you can buy it if you'd like....

[Edited by: Joeski1 at 2/20/2013 10:55:03 PM EST]
ziyulu
Champion Author Austin

Posts:11,745
Points:2,376,150
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 9:51:51 PM

Yes, just because it is black doesn't mean it's dirty.
VanIsleRover
Champion Author British Columbia

Posts:7,723
Points:1,146,545
Joined:Apr 2010
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 9:45:33 PM

Takes me back to the old days.
Black gold...
ash in the hearth.. ash in the garden..
Steam engines. Vintage memories.
Grizdad
Champion Author Montana

Posts:8,844
Points:1,283,330
Joined:Oct 2010
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 9:18:29 PM

Shhh... We are to believe coal is a dirty word.
csblesson
Champion Author Texas

Posts:3,720
Points:1,059,195
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 9:17:37 PM

I think nuclear is the cleanest
dbellie
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:1,079
Points:109,340
Joined:Nov 2010
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 9:11:28 PM

back to coal fired, steam propelled
mandoid
Champion Author Alabama

Posts:10,490
Points:2,266,130
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:52:41 PM

yabassa, spend much time on the left?
doeslayersr
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:13,065
Points:1,645,355
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:50:04 PM

Coal is king.
sillywagon
Champion Author New York

Posts:20,676
Points:2,214,920
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:46:06 PM

Wow! Clean coal could be real? Only rigid political idealogues would be against such innovation... because they hate fossil fuels.

Gotta love R&D.

I would like to read more on this clean coal process. Does it reduce other pollution from coal, like soot?

GarRafFra
Sophomore Author Worcester

Posts:167
Points:16,150
Joined:Jan 2013
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:40:13 PM

You wish.

Pramodsharma
Champion Author Richmond

Posts:5,088
Points:1,138,770
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:30:48 PM

Just 5 million in funding and 15 years? Efficiency simplified :)
TomT2Lee
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:6,503
Points:2,038,375
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:29:57 PM

Nuclear: bad. Solar: bad. Coal: bad. Wind: bad. Oil: bad. Gas: bad. Time to go back to horse and buggy.
DixieQueene
Champion Author Florida

Posts:13,068
Points:859,830
Joined:Jan 2013
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:28:31 PM

Coal plants here in the South with the Southern Company. All are located on major waterways to receive the coal by barge.* Hey Blu, hope you had a wonderful day. Talk to you soon girl *
YumaFellow
Champion Author Arizona

Posts:4,447
Points:1,338,725
Joined:Jan 2011
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:25:07 PM

Fox News pushing something funded by Big Government? How cheeky of them!
I am dubious that this will be operational, but time will tell.
davenles
Champion Author Texas

Posts:6,403
Points:1,491,110
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:21:11 PM

Be interesting to see if it scales up.
BuckyTJones
Champion Author Salt Lake City

Posts:5,441
Points:1,137,585
Joined:Mar 2010
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:05:49 PM

I guess this means they will have to find an other way to find fault with current energy sources.

[Edited by: BuckyTJones at 2/20/2013 8:06:53 PM EST]
bar1035
Champion Author Charlotte

Posts:13,537
Points:2,071,795
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 8:04:48 PM

"Fan discovered a way to heat coal, using iron-oxide pellets for an oxygen source and containing the reaction in a small, heated chamber from which pollutants cannot escape. The only waste product is therefore water and coal ash -- no greenhouse gases. As an added benefit, the metal from the iron-oxide can be recycled."

But then what? The landscape littered with heated chambers containing the pollutants? That paragraph doesn't add up.
BluWahoo
Champion Author Pensacola

Posts:62,679
Points:1,153,470
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:55:28 PM

Electric Power Plant here is coal generated. Government regulations have been strictly imposed, so the air here is some of the cleanest. Millions of dollars were spent several years ago to diminish any pollution issues arising.
MidNJ
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:10,150
Points:1,875,115
Joined:Sep 2009
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:51:03 PM

From the article:

"The government plans to continue to support the project, as well as the concept of "clean coal" in general."

============================

And they already received $5 million in Federal Government (our tax money) funding --- Interesting.

Night Owl
Champion Author Toronto

Posts:10,685
Points:2,554,805
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:37:39 PM

Yes, very interesting.
lonewolf_947
Champion Author New Hampshire

Posts:1,482
Points:644,235
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:26:06 PM

Interesting......... let's see it...........
qwerty17
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:6,381
Points:1,861,695
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:19:57 PM

show me.
listerone
Champion Author Boston

Posts:5,384
Points:1,550,095
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:16:35 PM

Osama Obama has promised to bankrupt the coal industry.And he won't let facts prevent him from keeping that promise.Obama doesn't have to answer to *anyone* for the *rest* of his life.And while he has the power to issue Executive Orders his attitude will be "we don't need no steenking Constitution".So the coal industry might as well zip up its 300 year supply (the US is truly the Saudi Arabia of coal) and shut it down.
PathfinderSC
Champion Author South Carolina

Posts:12,862
Points:2,589,135
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:16:23 PM

That is hard to believe.
YaBassa
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:5,668
Points:1,290,675
Joined:Nov 2011
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:14:00 PM

This could only be a FauxNews article
humblepie
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:63,689
Points:3,147,370
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:11:14 PM

and we have over a 100 year supply
mastermariner
Champion Author Texas

Posts:13,310
Points:1,241,315
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Feb 20, 2013 7:08:09 PM

Seeing is believing
Post a reply Back to Topics