Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    10:29 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Talk back to us! > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Changes to this site Back to Topics

Champion Author

Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Apr 15, 2013 10:59:58 PM

Why did they change this site? It's all white now & hard on the eyes. Also that IGNORE SHORT MESSAGES button is useless. If you check it ALL the posts disappear on many topics. What good is that?
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
Champion Author San Jose

Joined:Jul 2001
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2013 3:03:47 AM

Preventing the clogging might be nice, but having a way to not see it is nearly as good. I'll take it.
Profile Pic
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2013 1:05:40 PM

This button doesn't prevent the clogging up. All it does is giver the user a way to not see the clogging.
Profile Pic
Champion Author Maryland

Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2013 1:00:03 PM

What is it with that?

It's a compromise. Members have complained ad nauseum about members clogging up the discussions with one word and other short posts, etc., that have to be scrolled through in order to read (presumably) more substantive responses. the logic has been that you can't simply block "ok" because people will post "okay"; and if you block "okay" you'll get members posting "good post", and so on. Some members want one word answers to be able to be blocked, others want "short responses" to be able to be blocked. The current "character limit" for a message to be blocked (if you want to block posts) is simply a compromise and is subject to change because there is no one solution unless you allow each Gas Buddy member to determine the number of characters a post must have in order to be seen by the member. And even then you'll likely lose good posts because some "short" responses are informative.

It's simply a compromise; that's all and if you don't want to miss reading posts, then maybe the answer is to accept that some members will post "short" responses, and accept wading through them. And see what you think if/when the current character limit is changed.
Post a reply Back to Topics