Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    2:07 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Talk back to us! > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Poll Results Discussion Back to Topics
jrsva

Champion Author
Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Oct 5, 2009 11:38:00 PM

In a topic titled Suggest an Opinion Poll Question, a group of members work out the details of the weekly polls that appear here on GasBuddy. From time to time we have discussed various aspects of the results of past polls. Since that can get in the way of editing the next one, this new topic was created.

The idea is to be able to discuss any past poll, or a combination of past polls, with the idea of improving future polls. The focus here is on the construction of the polls and on their statistical significance or effectiveness, not on any individual result. Each poll has its own discussion thread and all can be found on the Past Polls page. If you want to discuss the issues addressed by the polls, please do it in those threads, not here.
 

REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
ziyulu
Champion Author Austin

Posts:11,608
Points:2,342,675
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Jan 24, 2015 3:46:20 PM

Couldn't fast food also be entertainment?
Profile Pic
bugc
Champion Author Boston

Posts:18,297
Points:3,736,630
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Jan 24, 2015 12:52:43 AM

... and the poll results were:
The money I’m saving from lower fuel prices is going mainly into:
Savings/investment/retirement 14%
Entertainment/fun 4%
Debt reduction 25%
Shopping 6%
More driving 5%
Other / nothing in particular 43%
Total votes: 20387

I suppose "fast food and online purchases" would be "Shopping."
Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Jan 22, 2015 8:44:03 AM

Regarding the poll about what folks did with the money they saved due to lower gas prices CNBC says they know how Americans applied their "savings" from lower gas prices". They spent it on fast food and online purchases.


[Edited by: SUVFan at 1/22/2015 8:45:49 AM EST]
Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Jan 22, 2015 8:39:07 AM

Time Magazine agrees with Gas Buddy's assessment (linked in my last post below) in one of today's GB articles that says the national average will dip below $2 very soon.
Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Jan 19, 2015 10:26:16 AM

Regarding the recent poll about the national average falling below $2.00, today's GB Blog says GasBuddy still believes the national average will go below $2.00 and fairly soon.
Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Dec 30, 2014 11:26:38 AM

Reducing fares might make sense in some cases. If the price point is too high, ridership will fall and lowering the fare might increase overall revenue. It works the same with income taxes. Too high of a rate will lead to cheating and evasion in addition to causing some folks to say they'd rather relax than provide jobs. With millions in the bank already, why work if too much of the profit (in the eyes of the investor/employer) go to the government?

Jrsva, I think most of the right wing recognizes the value and importance of public transportation and is willing to subsidize to a limited degree. But as Scout notes, when it becomes a government operation with no apparent cap on the expenses, transit workers tend to be overpaid and when unions enter the picture, they will demand that there be no route cuts even if there are no riders just to maintain jobs. But even if I'm wrong and most right wingers are as heartless as the mainstream media portrays them to be, that view point was not represented in the poll choices and the question was tilted in a way that presumed the respondent would desire to see the deficit funded in some manner.

"Make them live within their means" might have been a good option for that poll.
Profile Pic
scoutmaster
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:100,556
Points:3,991,140
Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Dec 30, 2014 7:58:05 AM

I disagree. Higher fares is right on the money since keeping them the same would not help increase revenue.

Actually, SUV, it's a union mentality that is killing public transit in Pittsburgh. The operators are way over paid for what they do.
Profile Pic
ziyulu
Champion Author Austin

Posts:11,608
Points:2,342,675
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Dec 30, 2014 7:14:30 AM

I see now. We asked about the "main source". So the option of higher fares should only say "fares" and it would be accurate.
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Dec 29, 2014 11:34:43 PM

Yeah, the transit poll could have been set up better but transit is an essential public service in any city. It is rare that transit can pay its own way entirely with fares because a large fraction of riders are poor. The right-wing does not want to help support transit and does not want to support welfare. They want welfare recipients to work, which is a lofty goal, but without transit most of the urban poor would be unable to get to work.

Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Dec 29, 2014 7:12:42 PM

Sorry, Z. That doesn't save it. The question asks, "What main source should be used to cover deficits in public transportation?" "Other" means some other source. Folks who are fundamentally opposed to these subsidies would not choose that either, whatever it might be. The concept of "covering deficits" means that public transportation is spending more than it takes in from fares and looks to someone else to pay the tab.

Profile Pic
jimbeaux53
Champion Author Kansas City

Posts:8,301
Points:1,703,610
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Dec 29, 2014 8:12:09 AM

Enough with the BS cheerleading.
Profile Pic
ziyulu
Champion Author Austin

Posts:11,608
Points:2,342,675
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 11:11:51 PM

I don't think it was a poor answer set. The respondents could have selected "Other" if none of those applied.
Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 9:52:56 PM

I'm with you SUV
Profile Pic
Glew123
All-Star Author San Francisco

Posts:676
Points:240,970
Joined:Aug 2014
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 9:28:23 PM

$2.25 fare for San Francisco...
Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 5:15:19 PM

Right, Scout! Due to the bailout mentality. They don't have to manage costs. They don't have to think about their routes or their equipment. Their drivers can be rude to passengers, as can other passengers. And instead of getting fired, management goes to the city or the county for more money and ends up with a raise.
Profile Pic
scoutmaster
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:100,556
Points:3,991,140
Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 4:26:10 PM

In Pittsburgh, the fares are already too high. Poor management.
Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 3:46:31 PM

Byte_Doctor, it's not the same. The fares may already be too high. It was a very poor question/answer set.

[Edited by: SUVFan at 12/28/2014 3:47:10 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Byte_Doctor
Champion Author Akron

Posts:7,337
Points:1,457,540
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 1:13:09 PM

SUVfan, for those who think mass transit should survive on its own merit and not have deficits funded by tax or other government revenue, there was the "higher fares" option. That would not be a bailout, but would be in line with the concepts of capitalism.

It is not the polls fault that people did not see that option, though having it "higher fares / cut expenses" could have been a better option. Still, on the whole I think it was a good poll.
Profile Pic
SUVFan
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:325,750
Points:2,360,930
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Dec 28, 2014 11:11:58 AM

This week's poll about how to fund mass transit deficits is going about the way I expected since seeing it had been put up and loaded. In the first 10 comments 2 or 3 commenters noted that their preferred choice is absent. They don't think the deficits should be the taxpayer's problem.

Unfortunately, I was on the road and otherwise consumed with work while work resumed on that poll. I had commented back before it was shelved a couple of weeks ago that I thought it was a bad poll.

As a group, those of us who work on the poll are very aware of the conservative side of the site would believe nothing should be done to bail out public transportation deficits. The systems should be permitted to go broke or reorganize under the bankruptcy laws might be some folks' thoughts on the matter. I think I put it, "Let them fail" as a proposed answer. The concept of tightening their belt by cutting their expenses is also a novel approach that leaps to my mind.

But pursuit of 100 points will overcome nearly any poll deficiency in terms of attracting votes that produce absolutely worthless results.
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Dec 17, 2014 11:42:06 PM


I have been working on the polls for almost six years; this vanishing topic is a complete mystery to me. I have made inquiries and will report whatever I find out in the topic linked by Larry, just below.
Profile Pic
teafortwo
Champion Author Washington

Posts:28,232
Points:2,120,135
Joined:Feb 2009
Message Posted: Dec 17, 2014 10:08:31 PM


Interesting discussion.

Is it possible this one also belongs in the TAY section? (Talk Amongst Yourselves)

Wondering if it's possible only certain members' suggestions are welcome these days?
Profile Pic
LarryMarg
Champion Author New York

Posts:3,036
Points:712,750
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: Dec 17, 2014 9:36:22 PM

Note that someone created a topic, What happened to the "suggest an opinion poll" thread?, but so far there's no answer posted.
Profile Pic
jerry972
Champion Author Denver

Posts:8,172
Points:1,943,600
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Dec 17, 2014 8:20:34 PM

Can anyone have any news as to why the topic labeled "Suggest An Opinion Poll Question" disappeared?


[Edited by: jerry972 at 12/17/2014 8:20:54 PM EST]
Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Dec 17, 2014 12:41:16 PM

You know jrsva, the poll doesn't change much from year to year. The only thing I see is that 5-7% of the people who were driving less and less every year seem to have stopped traveling altogether.

I see that PD's article touches on holiday spending as well.
Profile Pic
scoutmaster
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:100,556
Points:3,991,140
Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Dec 13, 2014 4:42:33 PM

I saw that jrsva. Wonder what happened to it? It wouldn't surprise me if CC just deleted it so they didn't have to deal with it.
Profile Pic
TxJeans
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:7,839
Points:878,150
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Dec 13, 2014 12:49:22 PM

"What’s really weird is that I posted the poll for CC just before midnight ET Thursday and saw it there with my own eyes. Now it is gone. ????"

I saw it too-- along with the agreed upon question to CC.

Any other topics lose replies? If not, then I guess the didn't want to have that discussion....

The HOLIDAY poll was a dud as expected
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Dec 13, 2014 1:01:42 AM

Here is a summary of the holiday-driving poll for the past six years, for whatever it is worth:

Compared to last year, will your driving for holiday gatherings be:
Year-------------------2009 - - 2010 - - 2011 - - 2012 - - 2013 - - 2014
• A lot more--------------4 - - - -4 - - - - 4 - - - - 4 - - - - -4 - - - -4
• A little more------------5 - - - -5 - - - - 5 - - - - 5 - - - - -5 - - - -6
• About same-----------57 - - - 52 - - - -51 - - - 51 - - - - 52 - - - 54
• Less------------------19 - - - 21 - - - -20 - - - 20 - - - - 19 - - - 14
• Alternate means--------1 - - - -1 - - - - 1 - - - - 1- - - - - 1 - - - - 1
• I’m not traveling ------11 - - - 14 - - - -17 - - - -17 - - - -17 - - - -18


[Edited by: jrsva at 12/13/2014 1:05:01 AM EST]
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Dec 13, 2014 1:00:51 AM

Too much rum? I don’t know. It doesn’t really matter; CC picked up the poll we proposed last week to use next. It was just kind of silly to ask, “Are gas prices . . . forcing you to spend less than usual . . .” when gas prices are lower than they’ve been for years.

What’s really weird is that I posted the poll for CC just before midnight ET Thursday and saw it there with my own eyes. Now it is gone.     ????

Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Dec 10, 2014 8:09:21 AM

jrsva, I see you guys did post the new poll in plenty of time. was CC off sick or did they have their Christmas party? who dropped the ball? It's a shame but I guess it's not the end of the world.
Profile Pic
TxJeans
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:7,839
Points:878,150
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Dec 8, 2014 7:53:49 AM

Too much rum again?
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Dec 8, 2014 12:35:25 AM


When no one manages to enter the new poll on Friday the system automatically defaults to the poll from one year ago. That has happened several times recently and it almost always results in an inappropriate poll.
Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Dec 7, 2014 8:42:24 PM

Pretty stupid to re-run 2012 and 2013's pool this year verbatim.
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Dec 2, 2014 1:09:05 AM


I believe that the majority of price posts are now done via the mobile apps but I don’t think one can use the apps to vote in the opinion poll — hence the poll is sampling only a segment of the GB population, those who use the web site.
Profile Pic
bugc
Champion Author Boston

Posts:18,297
Points:3,736,630
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Dec 2, 2014 1:03:46 AM

"more members are posting prices than before" would apply only to members who vote in the poll. That percentage can also change.

Profile Pic
Gas_Buddy
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:30,480
Points:3,773,835
Joined:Aug 2004
Message Posted: Nov 24, 2014 1:35:57 PM

"6% of people don't post prices? What are they doing here then?"

According to the 2014 week 24 poll, I post fuel prices on GasBuddy:
Every day 39%
Most days 19%
About half 11%
Seldom 17%
Never 12%
.
According to the 2013 week 24 poll, I post fuel prices on GasBuddy:
Every day 38%
Most days 22%
About half 10%
Seldom 15%
Never 12%
.
According to the 2012 week 21 poll, On a day when you post prices on GasBuddy, how many prices do you normally post?:
1 - 4 31%
5 18%
6 - 10 28%
11 - 25 6%
More than 25 1%
I do not post prices 13%
.
It seems, if the current 6 percent is correct, more members are posting prices than before.

And, as indicated in a number of other threads, many members have said say explicitly that they only "view prices" or as can be determined by their low number of points and long time membership, along with the wording of their post (or the large number of discussion threads they've started over the time of their membership versus their low number of total points), that they're not active price posters.



[Edited by: Gas_Buddy at 11/24/2014 1:37:13 PM EST]
Profile Pic
scoutmaster
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:100,556
Points:3,991,140
Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Nov 24, 2014 7:53:06 AM

Looks like those that are doing the same thing is up a little but other than that, the numbers are about the same <yawn>
Profile Pic
Byte_Doctor
Champion Author Akron

Posts:7,337
Points:1,457,540
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Nov 17, 2014 9:35:03 AM

"6% of people don't post prices? What are they doing here then?"

Socializing and benefitting from the prices posted by the other 94%.
Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Nov 17, 2014 9:18:47 AM

2014 47 When I post prices on GasBuddy I most frequently post:

6% of people don't post prices? What are they doing here then?
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Nov 13, 2014 12:59:53 AM

None of those who were predicting results this week were very good at it, including me; however, looking back on it, the results seem logical. There were only three categories with significant numbers —

I seriously doubt that ‘savings/investment/retirement’ folks actually moved money into those types of accounts. To me, savings just means that I would have a little more left in my bank account or wallet at the end of the month and I did not spend it on other stuff.

Debt reduction probably means that one paid a few bucks more on the credit-card bill, not that one tried to pay off his mortgage.

There may be some specific uses in the “Other” part of the last answer but I’m guessing that for most of the 45%, ‘nothing in particular’ simply means that the very modest amount gained from lower fuel prices was simply hidden in the month-to-month variability of the family budget and, while appreciated, it could not be assigned to any particular category. That is certainly the case for me. Out of the several thousand dollars that comes and goes every month, an extra ten or twenty bucks is not even noticed. Nothing sad about that. If I was driving to two minimum-wage jobs, trying to make ends meet, it would be important. That’s sad, that folks are in that situation.

Profile Pic
scoutmaster
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:100,556
Points:3,991,140
Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Nov 12, 2014 8:32:13 AM

"You said it was sad that they didn't put their money to (in your view) better use - that implies you are looking down at them as incapable or unwilling to make good financial decisions."

In your opinion that is what it implies. And boy that is a stretch. I never posted anything that said I was looking down on anyone or that anyone was a loser who answered other / nothing in particular. You, TxJeans, made that leap all on your own. And it is 100% incorrect.

"That is your common approach."

And yours is to find something wrong with everything I post.

"Saying it is "sad" that they didn't put their money to better use" is a negative judgement call.................."

In your opinion, TxJeans.

Sorry for tagging along on this derailing, folks.

Profile Pic
TxJeans
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:7,839
Points:878,150
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Nov 12, 2014 8:21:39 AM

You said it was sad that they didn't put their money to (in your view) better use - that implies you are looking down at them as incapable or unwilling to make good financial decisions.

That is your common approach.

If OTHER was the same as "Nothing in particular" we would have just put "Nothing in particular" which is still a valid response depending on the amount of "savings" a particular person made.

The only thing "sad" is that the savings is likely eaten up elsewhere with other rising prices for many folks.

Saying it is "sad" that they didn't put their money to better use" is a negative judgement call against those that chose that option, and I (and others) are pointing out that choosing that option does not mean folks aren't taking advantage of savings. They just aren't putting it where YOU think they should based on YOUR situation. You don't know if they didn't put it to better use for THEIR situation - such as charity, helping a friend, etc.

So, go on feeling sad about the 45% or so - it is your prerogative.
Profile Pic
scoutmaster
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:100,556
Points:3,991,140
Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Nov 12, 2014 8:00:49 AM

"So, unlike you, I do not see all folks that chose that option as losers that don't know what they are doing financially and something to be sad about."

Where did I call anyone in this topic a loser, TxJeans? Nowhere. Again your interpretation. I think it's about time you stop putting words in my mouth.

If the choice was titled just "Other", I would not have made the comment. But it is titled "other / Nothing in particular" which, in my opinion, gives the connotation of nothing being done. You might not agree but that is my opinion. Nowhere did I claim or state anyone was a loser.

And, TxJeans, just like me, you don't know the peoples situations that answered Other / nothing in particular. I never claimed I did and neither did you but you made the assumption I thought they were losers. I made no such assumption.
Profile Pic
TxJeans
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:7,839
Points:878,150
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Nov 12, 2014 7:49:51 AM

Scout - that 45% includes a lot of other things that can be just as valuable for those to spend their money on if they have their retirement and savings under control - charitable spending (which most would not classify as shopping is just one example). You are looking at it from the expect the worse side and painting with a board brush. But, I understand you feel that way and why you do.

Seriously, my "savings" in gas money for this short down tick is not significant to my retirement or savings unless prices remain down for an extended period of time. I don't add to my retirement funds in that manner nor am I going to move $5/10 even $20 to my "Savings" accounts during this down tick that I doubt will be long term.

So, what I do with it in the short term vs the long term depends on MY specific situation. If I have been putting off some purchases because of budget, I might spend on those purchases now, or I might just park it on the side until I see how long this down tick occurs, and then decide where best to put it. Yeah, I might call that savings - but other might not at this point but just consider it gas money for when gas goes back up.

And, there are many that might just let it go to their contingency fund and not consider that "Savings/Investments/retirements" as they may interpret that as putting it in a specific account for a specific purpose.

So, unlike you, I do not see all folks that chose that option as losers that don't know what they are doing financially and something to be sad about.

Yeah, I bet there are some that fall in that category, but I won't use that broad paintbrush as there are so many reasons for choosing that option that ARE valid reasons for responsible people.

Saying it is sad - you are judging those that you say are "not taking better advantage of their savings"...You don't know they aren't just because they chose OTHER/Nothing in particular. Is my mom that saved an entire $5 thus far "not taking better advantage of her savings" because that $5 stayed in her budget?



[Edited by: TxJeans at 11/12/2014 7:52:08 AM EST]
Profile Pic
scoutmaster
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:100,556
Points:3,991,140
Joined:Mar 2003
Message Posted: Nov 12, 2014 7:00:45 AM

I'm not judging anyone negatively, TxJeans. I just think it's sad that people aren't taking better advantage of their savings. Nothing negative there, except your interpretation.

It is encouraging to see that roughly 40% are saving or reducing their debt.
Profile Pic
RichWLIN
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:8,254
Points:1,378,705
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Nov 12, 2014 6:55:29 AM

The poll is simply flawed. The savings for temporarily lower fuel costs for the average household are fleeting. The poll is really asking folks what they would like to do with any extra cash they may have. It is doubtful that many people can actually account for the few extra bucks they didn't spend on fuel.

It is unlikely that many respondents even know where any meager gas savings are winding up. It may be wishful thinking by those who say their few dollars gas savings per week end up in savings or invested in a retirement account, but it is much more believable that any short term surplus is spent elsewhere and not saved.

About half the respondents answered honestly.

RG


[Edited by: RichWLIN at 11/12/2014 6:56:45 AM EST]
Profile Pic
TxJeans
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:7,839
Points:878,150
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Nov 11, 2014 7:58:16 PM

The money I’m saving from lower fuel prices is going mainly into: (Discuss)
Savings/investment/retirement 15%
Entertainment/fun 3%
Debt reduction 24%
Shopping 5%
More driving 4%
Other / nothing in particular 45%
Total votes: 14072

Scout posted this in the Poll Results topic rather than here:

"I feel it's sad because people have the chance to do something with the money they are saving and currently 46% are doing Other/Nothing."

Although I am a bit surprised it was 46% that said Other/Nothing, I don't feel "sad" about it and not negatively judging all of them.

I feel encouraged that almost 1/4 said "debt reduction" and another 15% said retirement. The amounts for shopping and entertainment were lower than I might have expected.

That OTHER could include a large number of things depending on their overall financial picture....Positive things.

Things such as:
- Charity.
- Helping a friend or family member
- Church
- Off setting increases in heating costs, or health care costs, etc.
etc.

And, there are some who being retired may not see much savings from the gas prices due to the small amount of gas that they use. I think many might have interpreted the categories a bit too strictly and though technically saving it, not being specific about putting it in their formal savings account, but going to give a bit more cushion against the "bumps" on the road of life in their "general" fund.

"Other" could also include spreading the savings across several different categories of responses. A number indicated that it went to offset the increase of cost in other areas of their budget. Several mentioned groceries and might not have considered that as part of "shopping" by interpreting shopping for non-essentials - wants or nice to haves, not needs.

Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Nov 10, 2014 7:40:08 AM

2014 46 The money I’m saving from lower fuel prices is going mainly into:

This poll has a large percentage of people saying "other" probably due the the high level of cynicism of the members of this site towards the gas market. If you did get an answer about a trip to Hawaii with the extra $50 saved, it was likely sarcastic.
Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Oct 20, 2014 8:13:08 AM

The problem with this driving without lights poll is, if you don't know your lights aren't on, how are you going to vote YES?

Too many votes for NO, I bet that a large portion of those are either unaware YES's or 'automatic lights' people who didn't read down far enough.
Profile Pic
a5
Champion Author Ottawa

Posts:4,866
Points:2,720,315
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Oct 14, 2014 7:27:00 AM

"If you were to buy a primary vehicle today, which would you buy?"

Some people seem to have missed the word PRIMARY and chose something other than what meets their primary need/desire.

Those who asked for a hatchback choice I suppose should have chosen sedan/coupe.
Didn't see anyone asking for a 'convertible' choice.
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:13,192
Points:2,354,245
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Oct 9, 2014 1:02:00 AM

Areas with extended rush hours (such as DC) would not benefit from tolls or flex-time. Carpooling and telecommuting seem to be the only real help there. So the most effective method (I do like that word) will be dependent on local conditions.

We had a collective lack of vision in designing the speed-trap poll. It started out as a survey question, which we decided to turn into an opinion poll and got it wrong. I agree that we should run A5's poll at some point. I would reword it to: What should government do with the money from traffic fines? So that would cover all fines, not just speeding.

Profile Pic
jerry972
Champion Author Denver

Posts:8,172
Points:1,943,600
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Oct 8, 2014 7:42:58 PM

a5,

Your alternate question would be a good one to ask. I think it should be put on the list.
Post a reply Back to Topics