Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    12:25 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Fuel Economy > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Cold Air Intake Back to Topics
wiskeyoutpost

Rookie Author
Orange County

Posts:33
Points:749,535
Joined:Jan 2007
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2014 1:15:29 PM

Have you installed a cold air intake kit for your vehicle? Most manufacturers (mine is a K&N) have documented results of higher fuel economy and more HP (horse-power) I do feel more power, but I think that I am now driving with a heavier foot, so the mileage is about the same. I would like other folks opinion on this. Regards, Wiskey
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
Sugarshaneo7
Veteran Author Michigan

Posts:374
Points:72,470
Joined:Nov 2011
Message Posted: May 11, 2014 8:31:21 PM

no idea.
Profile Pic
outlaw329
Champion Author Austin

Posts:9,853
Points:1,900,685
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: May 2, 2014 9:44:07 PM

Have it on my 95 YJ Wrangler and there is more power and about 1 mpg more.
Profile Pic
arnerator
Champion Author Seattle

Posts:10,742
Points:2,210,455
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: May 2, 2014 9:41:15 PM

Never heard of it
Profile Pic
usmc5home
Rookie Author Pennsylvania

Posts:9
Points:116,175
Joined:Apr 2014
Message Posted: May 2, 2014 4:55:07 PM

Nope
Profile Pic
Nuzan
All-Star Author Nevada

Posts:625
Points:590,195
Joined:Jun 2012
Message Posted: May 2, 2014 2:09:46 PM

No
Profile Pic
Rob655321
Rookie Author Virginia

Posts:54
Points:305,065
Joined:Jul 2013
Message Posted: Apr 23, 2014 12:19:37 PM

I use the K&N air filter that fits the stock air box on my car. I detect more HP and a better exhaust sound, not sure about a gas mileage increase.
Profile Pic
drgeeforce
Sophomore Author Los Angeles

Posts:248
Points:361,120
Joined:Oct 2011
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2014 7:30:40 PM

I used to have a '67 Chevelle with a short snorkle sucking hot air from the engine bay. When I ducted air from the grille I got a small Ram-air effect and got very little increases in HP. The carburetor wasn't tuned to compensate for this. When I ducted from the wheel well I lost HP probably because of a Venturi effect.
Profile Pic
Awing1
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:1,107
Points:295,410
Joined:Aug 2013
Message Posted: Apr 19, 2014 4:19:47 PM

No.
Profile Pic
sanderstheparro
Champion Author Wilmington

Posts:1,749
Points:374,065
Joined:Dec 2013
Message Posted: Apr 19, 2014 3:16:45 PM

"....Then it's oxidized during combustion and then exhausted. It never gets a chance to reach the piston rings...."

----------------

What a imaginative explanation and totally BS. You always have blowby through the piston rings. You never have a tight seal. That's why vehicles have PCV valves. A certain amount of air and fuel mix is pulled down by the piston and slips through the piston rings into the crankcase. This escaping gas is called blow-by -- and it's unavoidable.

[Edited by: sanderstheparro at 4/19/2014 3:17:41 PM EST]
Profile Pic
sanderstheparro
Champion Author Wilmington

Posts:1,749
Points:374,065
Joined:Dec 2013
Message Posted: Apr 19, 2014 3:00:54 PM

Cold air intake only increases horsepower. It does NOT!!! increase fuel economy. How many times must this point must be made? Cold air is heavier and therefore air contains more oxygen and requires more fuel to prevent a lean condition. Likewise, cold air intake makes it easier for your car to breathe so it doesn't work as hard.

Manufacturers who advertise better fuel economy with their cold air intake systems will often say you get better fuel economy because they want to sell you their product and they know you're a sucker who beleive anything.
Profile Pic
dev9069
Rookie Author New Jersey

Posts:21
Points:7,170
Joined:Apr 2014
Message Posted: Apr 19, 2014 12:50:45 PM

no
Profile Pic
drgeeforce
Sophomore Author Los Angeles

Posts:248
Points:361,120
Joined:Oct 2011
Message Posted: Apr 19, 2014 12:38:46 PM

CAI can benefit most diesels as the intake is not linked to a throttle. Throttles limit stoichiometric intake by using more fuel to achieve a richer mixture, where diesels are at default a lean burn. Gasoline systems are regulated by the mass air intake sensor, so a restrictive air cleaner will cause the throttle to use less gas, reducing power overall.
Profile Pic
hoopitup2000
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:1,437
Points:455,350
Joined:Jul 2013
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2014 6:28:46 AM

I always thought;
Cold air intake= Better performance
Warm air intake= Better MPG's
Profile Pic
MertieMan
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:17,394
Points:3,500,235
Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2014 5:19:50 AM

I don't mess with it and mine is purely stock.
Profile Pic
twt
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:12,848
Points:1,586,760
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Apr 17, 2014 2:49:33 AM

No. Just another scam.
Profile Pic
the1roadhog
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:11,530
Points:2,626,735
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2014 7:02:21 PM

nope
Profile Pic
MNJ2
Champion Author Minnesota

Posts:1,092
Points:2,090,665
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2014 4:41:34 PM

In Minnesota, I'm sick and tired of cold air intake. Don't want anymore of it. :)
Profile Pic
contiki
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:26,217
Points:1,103,565
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Apr 16, 2014 7:20:16 AM

Never......
Profile Pic
deant99
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:129,836
Points:349,885
Joined:Sep 2011
Message Posted: Apr 13, 2014 9:00:48 PM

no
Profile Pic
contiki
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:26,217
Points:1,103,565
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Apr 11, 2014 7:13:18 AM

never...........
Profile Pic
mybigtruck
Champion Author San Jose

Posts:1,171
Points:712,530
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2014 12:15:18 PM

Nope. You feel more responsiveness since there's less of a restriction on the intake...ie. less dirt filtering.
Profile Pic
jimmy544
Champion Author Boston

Posts:7,113
Points:1,203,230
Joined:Feb 2011
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2014 8:55:31 AM

None of these systems work very well unless you have some kind of feedback on you gas consumption. It is difficult to tell if there are difference unless you are so equipped.
Profile Pic
Floridaman2013
Champion Author Florida

Posts:2,379
Points:496,045
Joined:May 2013
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2014 8:17:51 AM

Not worth the cost of the system. I use the factory system and sometimes just switch the air filter with a HP model. If on off roads or dusty conditions, i will use the paper filter. Cheaper to change.
Profile Pic
hoopitup2000
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:1,437
Points:455,350
Joined:Jul 2013
Message Posted: Apr 10, 2014 6:39:01 AM

Not worth it. Grill blocking is a much cheaper option & it works!!
Profile Pic
thirstyV8suv
All-Star Author Columbus

Posts:619
Points:488,875
Joined:May 2013
Message Posted: Apr 9, 2014 8:53:47 PM

at $250+ for one of those CAI systems are you really saving money? Let's assume you get 0.5 more miles per gallon (unlikely but let's assume). You'd have to drive quite a bit to recoup the cost of the system. I have one on an old Jeep of mine but it's for performance purposes as part of a larger overall tune and nothing to do with fuel economy.
Profile Pic
luvmyrv
All-Star Author Winnipeg

Posts:866
Points:469,710
Joined:Dec 2012
Message Posted: Apr 9, 2014 2:37:11 PM

no
Profile Pic
santa_banta
Rookie Author San Jose

Posts:49
Points:70,565
Joined:Apr 2014
Message Posted: Apr 9, 2014 10:34:08 AM

looking into it
Profile Pic
Vin63
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:2,781
Points:674,625
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Apr 9, 2014 9:41:34 AM

It really comes down to driving behavior.
Profile Pic
ricebike
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:12,314
Points:2,375,055
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 12:06:24 PM

Cbob says, "I will not be buying one , when a paper filter for 10 bucks keeps my intake cleaner than a 100 dollar filter , the paper wins . "

i agree. i saw a couple of online sites proving that the paper wins over a pre-oiled soaked fiber filter
Profile Pic
Dinker
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:6,170
Points:151,850
Joined:Apr 2005
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 11:50:15 AM

looking into one
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,538
Points:61,145
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 10:38:07 AM

My truck has an OEM cold air intake with standard paper element filter. The EFI gets is ambient air from the outer fender well area, free from engine compartment/radiator expelled heat and heat from the exhaust system.

The filter air box does heat up with under-hood temps which is normal for economy but a little stressed for extremely hot Summer days. Being I have never needed to work the engine to it's extreme energy load output since I have owned the vehicle(no problems).

I do know that I can get better economy during weather below 60* F if the incoming air was removed from the fender well area an then picked up with the warmer under-hood sources of warmer temps during Spring, Fall, and especially Winter. Once the engine reaches normal operation temps at anytime the EFI system does decent balance for any normal type of operational service.

I can't fault my filter system for my requirements yet, but for economy the air supply is too cold at times, for top performance it could be improved upon. That would be mods to the location or switching over to another air-box location, to bring up total performance image(meaning more mods) needed also. Just not for my purposes, no severe load duty use planned.
Profile Pic
OilerFan
Champion Author Tulsa

Posts:16,398
Points:2,924,785
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 9:54:25 AM

The cold air intake doesn't cost that much.
Profile Pic
WEPSMAN
Champion Author South Dakota

Posts:11,306
Points:2,556,125
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 9:20:30 AM

Even if you do get better mileage, how long will it take to make up for the price of the cold air intake? Are you still going to have the vehicle then? Is it really worth it?
Profile Pic
dassfg
Champion Author Fort Worth

Posts:2,386
Points:1,069,920
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 8:28:13 AM

Never put one on my truck but know those who have. Seems like a lot of money.
Profile Pic
tklsr
Champion Author Akron

Posts:1,045
Points:986,750
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 7:50:35 AM

yawn
Profile Pic
contiki
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:26,217
Points:1,103,565
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Apr 6, 2014 7:29:53 AM

No never...........
Profile Pic
Houckster
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:11,107
Points:768,535
Joined:Sep 2003
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2014 1:43:21 PM

What I was trying to point out is that just about any air filter you use, K&N or conventional, will protect an engine sufficiently for it to last well beyond the number of miles most people will drive.

I expect my engine will last 200-300K just like yours though at the rate I'm driving, it's academic.
Profile Pic
CactusBobs
Champion Author Arizona

Posts:4,279
Points:905,630
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2014 12:17:11 PM

Houckster: all i can say is enjoy your k&n .
I will not be buying one , when a paper filter for 10 bucks keeps my intake cleaner than a 100 dollar filter , the paper wins .

50K is no mileage to find out whats going on , you could have gone half that with no filter and still had the same result . engine wear is slow and a good filter makes the difference of an engine lasting 100k or one that lasts 300k

In today's world any well made (sorry Chrysler) engine lasts at least 200k ,even with not the best care.

A K&N has no place under my hood , if i find one there i sell it on e bay.

like i said enjoy "your" K&N.

[Edited by: CactusBobs at 4/5/2014 12:18:31 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Houckster
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:11,107
Points:768,535
Joined:Sep 2003
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2014 11:10:03 AM

CACTUSBOB writes: So what do you get for your 100 bucks........premature engine wear !

gota love marketing !!!
______
Not necessarily. While K&N filters don't stop as much dirt as conventional filters, that doesn't mean the dirt that gets past the filter will cause wear.

Even K&N filter will stop dirt that's not visible to the human eye and that means we're dealing with microscopic particles that travel in the current of air that constantly gains speed as it travels through the engine. By the time the dirt particle reaches the combustion chamber, it is traveling hundreds of miles per hour. Then it's oxidized during combustion and then exhausted. It never gets a chance to reach the piston rings.

I've had a K&N filter installed for over 50K miles and my engine burns no oil. Oil consumption is on the order of about 1 ounce every 12.5K miles.

[Edited by: Houckster at 4/5/2014 11:11:29 AM EST]
Profile Pic
MertieMan
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:17,394
Points:3,500,235
Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2014 8:43:22 AM

Most of this so called add on junk causes nothing but troubles in one way or another.
Profile Pic
jes
Champion Author Pennsylvania

Posts:18,710
Points:3,942,090
Joined:Jun 2003
Message Posted: Apr 5, 2014 8:18:32 AM

No
Profile Pic
pghbill
Champion Author Pittsburgh

Posts:1,877
Points:1,029,835
Joined:Jul 2005
Message Posted: Apr 3, 2014 12:29:38 AM

never tried
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,538
Points:61,145
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2014 11:18:27 PM

On a 90+ degree day my engines can use a cooler breath of intake air, considering what the under-hood temps are, even a bit of moist air perks their response noticeably, over the normal rpm ranges.

Any time below 70 F degrees I have never found a benefit, only with heavy upper range to WOT use for total performance and not economy.
Profile Pic
PatAZ
Champion Author Tucson

Posts:10,123
Points:144,130
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2014 4:43:34 PM

I've heard too much bad about doing it.
Profile Pic
twt
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:12,848
Points:1,586,760
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Apr 1, 2014 4:31:09 AM

Bad, idea.
Profile Pic
CactusBobs
Champion Author Arizona

Posts:4,279
Points:905,630
Joined:Jun 2010
Message Posted: Apr 1, 2014 12:09:17 AM

K&N Filters let way too much dirt past them , even when well serviced and oiled

look in the tubing past any K&N filter and you will see dirt stuck to the tubing walls

If you complain you will be told that's the price of better airflow .
The problem, unless your racing, you don't use or need that airflow .

So what do you get for your 100 bucks........premature engine wear !

gota love marketing !!!
Profile Pic
OceanArcher
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:8,155
Points:1,899,975
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2014 10:44:47 PM

Cold Air Intakes run the risk of ingesting large amounts of standing water
Profile Pic
Houckster
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:11,107
Points:768,535
Joined:Sep 2003
Message Posted: Mar 31, 2014 1:36:06 PM

Save your money. I have looked at the K&N filters and I actually use one of them but the cold air intake is simply silly. They reroute the intake to get air from outside the engine compartment but the net effect of the "colder" air is negligible because on a hot day, there's really no real cold air to be had. Moreover, if you are driving in the rain and you hit a puddle, the intake might snort some of the water and that would result in your engine possibly being seriously damaged.

Horsepower gains will be realized only when driving hard. Clean air emissions standards have required the OEMs to make all aspects of their engines better to save fuel. The days of bolt-on horsepower and fuel efficiency are pretty much over. OEM air intake and exhaust systems are pretty efficient these days.
Post a reply Back to Topics