Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    9:27 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Fuel Economy > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: 55 MPH vs. 65 MPH Back to Topics
AustinLee3

Veteran Author
Tennessee

Posts:375
Points:163,550
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Dec 14, 2013 12:58:24 PM

According to different sites, the more you go over 55 miles per hour, the less gas mileage your car will be getting. Does this apply to all vehicles?

I drive a 2003 Cavalier automatic and its estimates get about 21 city to 30 highway. I've been getting 26 city and 32 highway. I've noticed that when I would normally do 55 miles per hour that my car was getting about 30 miles to the gallon, but when I started doing 65 miles per hour on my normal route to school, I've been getting about 32 - 34 miles to the gallon.

To me, it seems as if my car gets better gas mileage when I'm doing 65 miles an hour. Yes, it's wrong and unsafe to speed, but it's just something that I have noticed.
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
jjb67
Veteran Author Orlando

Posts:457
Points:220,920
Joined:Mar 2010
Message Posted: Aug 25, 2014 11:22:34 AM

It seems as if I get slightly better gas mileage going 65 vs. 55 mph, but having cruise control on actually gives me better mileage than not having it on.
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Aug 25, 2014 8:56:47 AM

Driving in the natural, always is subject to the elements of slight tire pressure variance/resistance, mainly wind direction resistance with or against vehicle direction.

Pinning down mileage over a lengthy driving test reference can often be an upset for the precise results. Also not knowing the amount of air in the upper fuel tank trapped by the angle of refueling position (Expansion Area.

Then there is the alternator/power steering resistive operation loads that can vary as one drives along, Sun shade/A/C operation control, points where cruise may be paused/resumed, ETC. all have varied affects against comparisons for accurate mileage, but have at it stay concerned, save $$$.
Profile Pic
WilhamClouse
Champion Author Calgary

Posts:2,421
Points:575,030
Joined:Jun 2013
Message Posted: Aug 25, 2014 12:00:05 AM

I just drive.
Profile Pic
cranpa1956
Rookie Author Indiana

Posts:5
Points:175,555
Joined:Jan 2012
Message Posted: Aug 24, 2014 11:06:19 AM

My car, a 2013 Kia Forte, gets its best mileage at about 62mph. On the highway I set the cruise and leave it at that except where speed limits or safety wont allow.
Profile Pic
OilerFan
Champion Author Tulsa

Posts:16,429
Points:2,932,235
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Aug 24, 2014 10:37:38 AM

why not drive for a couple of weeks at 55, and then drive a couple of weeks at 65, and you'll have the answer for your vehicle.
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Aug 24, 2014 10:01:34 AM

The Trend today seems to be, when driving highway stay within 5-7 MPH over the limits by which a lot of drivers do. I think The OEMs engineer their economy vehicles to "Sweet Spot" those speeds.

The more powerful performance V/6 0r V/8s even Turbo-Charged owners often push that speed element for higher travel speeds, state zones vary, motorists hurry to destinations, and not always plan on being poky along their way.

Yes the timid safety driver using slower vehicles save more fuel, but that choice often relates to the opposite Hurry attitudes.... that is determined by style looks and Aero design, Drivers habits, mileage is secondary. Kick Ass vehicles are exciting to drive, are more expensive to own/drive, but possibly can get better mileage over the 55 older limits by (newer technology)lighter material, application. Some cars have Wings!!!
Profile Pic
xbAG
Champion Author California

Posts:2,375
Points:740,790
Joined:Jan 2012
Message Posted: Aug 23, 2014 8:56:00 PM

55, or the speed of traffic,
usually in the slower lane.
I'm not in a hurry.
Profile Pic
twt
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:12,912
Points:1,595,660
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 23, 2014 4:25:43 AM

Duh. The faster you run an engine, the faster it burns fuel.
Profile Pic
StArrow68
Champion Author Oakland

Posts:5,912
Points:1,967,395
Joined:Apr 2003
Message Posted: Aug 23, 2014 1:42:03 AM

The readings are unreliable but you use them to get to a best mpg at 67mph, hummmm.....

Studies done by those that know how to test, show that increasing mph above 55 result in a loss of mpg due to wind resistance. I'd bet they are fairly accurate.
Profile Pic
GrumpyCat
Champion Author Alabama

Posts:5,431
Points:1,276,015
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Aug 23, 2014 12:06:37 AM

"Has anyone used a fuel economy gauge to verify some of these assertions."

My 2000 Avalon had one. It wasn't terribly accurate and reset every time the engine was turned off. But it helped establish the peak MPG was to be had at about 67 MPH. No matter I would drive the car nonstop from one gas station to the next 500 miles later the fool computer might read 28 or 29 MPG while the calculator gave 30-34 MPG.

When a tank of gas lasts 450+ miles a lot of things change during the tank. Lots of variables. Very difficult to repeat the experiment with precision. Drive once and get 34 MPG. Attempt to repeat and get 30 MPG. So I'm careful to restrict my claims to, "I never got better than 27 MPG on 60 MPH roads or less than 30 MPG on 70 MPH roads."
Profile Pic
mrgots2000
All-Star Author New York

Posts:779
Points:111,020
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Aug 22, 2014 3:33:53 PM

Has anyone used a fuel economy gauge to verify some of these assertions.
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 9:40:20 PM

Since I don't own an electric vehicle at present I will have to confer with my chat friends then relying on their reports over time. The thing is I have difficulty with their facts V/S their owner opinions, they are hard to satisfy.

Older guys just stick to their main likes, and that makes it really hard to even open their reasoning gates. They don't even care about cruising speeds, none of the three think the same about that.

When you have several opinions doing comparisons, one ends up with much different data, then there is that natures wind factor to upset those factors, data whatever, logical reality....... Again! Wind direction......is a factor!.......
Profile Pic
Awing1
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:1,137
Points:303,860
Joined:Aug 2013
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 3:19:01 PM

It's a general description that you can get better mileage up to certain speed than higher speeds, but it also depends on cars due to different gears, etc. For me, 55 or 65 mph doesn't have big difference.
Profile Pic
GrumpyCat
Champion Author Alabama

Posts:5,431
Points:1,276,015
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 2:59:38 PM

"Yes there is no logical way one can compare the modern electric driven vehicles with cruising speed differences(Sweet spots)of economy travel speeds."

Sure there is a logical way to compare. Fuel up, drive, measure. Nothing has changed.

What one can't do is make broad generalizations about vehicles. Thats the same mistake as many fool governments have made in giving preferential treatment to "hybrids". Just because a vehicle is a hybrid doesn't mean it has similar benefits as a Prius.
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2014 10:26:17 AM

Yes there is no logical way one can compare the modern electric driven vehicles with cruising speed differences(Sweet spots)of economy travel speeds.

I must hand out gratitude for the newer technology, I just never hear much talk about how good of mileage the electric motivated vehicles are when adverse winter snows, ice, very low degree temps effect those vehicles when in daily use. Wondering if they make a 4X4 hybrid, probably do for the north climates.

I know Winter, bad Winters drive up my driving costs, not owning any Hybrids as yet. Three casual friends have bought new ones this year, three that I have seen, each a different color,...options. Sixty-4-72 MPH. is my Sweet spot on a Summer calm day cruising, level terrain. I buy one size oversize tires when replacing.
Profile Pic
GrumpyCat
Champion Author Alabama

Posts:5,431
Points:1,276,015
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2014 10:17:54 AM

"The lower speed of 55 for older vehicles Non ECM or early ECM controlled. The higher speed of 65 + or - works for the OHC VCT ECM controlled including Turbo charged premium gas or diesel with multi speed trannys(CVTs) MYOP….."

That is way way too broad of a generalization.

My Prius had more electronic controls governing the engine and drive than you can shake a stick at. Its peak MPG was at about 38 MPH. Big dip in the low 40's. Another peak about 50 MPH, after which it tapered off as speed increased much as the theorists are broadly claiming for all vehicles.

As I said before my 2000 Avalon XLS peaked at about 67 MPH.

My diesel SUV gets 29 MPG at 70 MPH on the same 500 mile day quoted for the Avalon. 31 MPG if driven at 60 MPH. Prius got 43-45 MPG on same 70 MPH route.
Profile Pic
WES03
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:7,055
Points:1,784,350
Joined:Feb 2009
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2014 9:32:17 AM

I notice a fall off in MPG when driving at 65-70 MPH.
Profile Pic
Jackson126
All-Star Author Virginia

Posts:742
Points:253,350
Joined:May 2014
Message Posted: Aug 17, 2014 9:31:26 AM

No depends on gearing and engine output
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Aug 17, 2014 8:25:36 AM

The lower speed of 55 for older vehicles Non ECM or early ECM controlled. The higher speed of 65 + or - works for the OHC VCT ECM controlled including Turbo charged premium gas or diesel with multi speed trannys(CVTs) MYOP.....
Profile Pic
davisadm
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:3,114
Points:1,009,525
Joined:Dec 2011
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2014 11:57:32 AM

It depends how a cars gearing is set up and at what speed the engine is turning at the most efficient RPM.
Profile Pic
BUSSY
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:12,568
Points:2,075,905
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2014 11:44:30 AM

I think 55MPH would apply to most for best mileage
Profile Pic
Banjoe
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:8,469
Points:1,225,480
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2014 9:52:55 AM

GrumpyCat - a perfect example of seeking out the sweet spot specific for each vehicle.

There is no global answer that covers all situations and it takes work to discover each individual case.
Profile Pic
GrumpyCat
Champion Author Alabama

Posts:5,431
Points:1,276,015
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Aug 13, 2014 3:35:29 PM

"If some vehicles have higher gears for going faster, it's possible that they'd be getting their best mileage at a higher speed. However, no American made cars or trucks fall into this category."

I have logged over 20,000 miles on interstate in a Kentucky-built 2000 Toyota Avalon XLS which got its best MPG at about 67 MPH.

On 70 MPH roads I never got less than 30 MPG. Typically on 500 mile days.

On 60 MPH roads I never got over 27 MPG.

All MPG calculated at fuel pump with calculator and logbook.

[Edited by: GrumpyCat at 8/13/2014 3:36:01 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Banjoe
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:8,469
Points:1,225,480
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Aug 13, 2014 8:16:42 AM

Can't support your point because we certainly don't get the best mileage standing still.

There's a lot that goes into the final number besides drag so let's not get focused on only one factor in the chain.
Profile Pic
46chief
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:4,160
Points:2,401,370
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2014 8:58:23 AM

As you double your speed the drag co-efficient on your vehicle quadruples. More drag means more gas.
Profile Pic
OilerFan
Champion Author Tulsa

Posts:16,429
Points:2,932,235
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2014 8:58:04 AM

Every vehicle I've ever driven, the gas mileage was worse as the speed increased. Essentially, the harder the engine works, the lower the mileage. If the RPMs are higher, it's working harder.
The transmission basically allows a comfortable drive at 55, and the RPMs are reasonably at a relaxed rate. Anything higher means the engine is working harder and getting fewer mileages per gallon. That's just basic.
If some vehicles have higher gears for going faster, it's possible that they'd be getting their best mileage at a higher speed. However, no American made cars or trucks fall into this category.
Profile Pic
Banjoe
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:8,469
Points:1,225,480
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2014 7:26:05 AM

Don't mean to rain on anyone's parade but faster doesn't mean more fuel consumption.

Slow speeds are a killer on my diesel mileage and it's not happy until it's in 6th gear and in the 55 - 65 mph range.
Profile Pic
twt
Champion Author Virginia Beach

Posts:12,912
Points:1,595,660
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2014 4:14:06 AM

Of course, it burns more gas when driving faster. If the engine is running faster, it's using more fuel. DUH
Profile Pic
krazkar
Champion Author Calgary

Posts:2,918
Points:886,455
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2014 12:43:32 AM

Don't care, rather drive faster.
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Aug 8, 2014 9:48:24 AM

I must agree with MertieMan , Way too much operational junk in the modern vehicles along with Many Drivers don't seem to know what Assured Clear distance is anymore or Mainly even Don't Care! Nerves V/S Risky..... seems so..... Vehicle Playtime.... Say What?.... Weather conditions....? Yey-Ok!
Profile Pic
MertieMan
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:17,434
Points:3,510,135
Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Aug 8, 2014 9:06:33 AM

You positively can't drive speeds like this on the interstates, unless of course you have a "death wish".
Profile Pic
drivebye
Champion Author San Jose

Posts:2,086
Points:161,905
Joined:Oct 2012
Message Posted: Aug 8, 2014 1:01:05 AM

In the last few days I've read news articles on GasBuddy that indicate speed limits are rising in some states due to results of latest research.

In 2014, four states have raised posted limits to as high as 80 mph or else they added more roads to the maximum limits. On the other hand, there have been other states that tried to raise speed limits this year but failed.

Here's more info: www.iihs.org/iihs/sr/statusreport/article/49/6/3
Profile Pic
hoopitup2000
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:1,473
Points:463,150
Joined:Jul 2013
Message Posted: Jul 25, 2014 6:29:55 AM

No carpooler today, so forced me into the slower traffic lanes this morning. Usual commute around 65-70 MPH in the HOV yields upper 40's MPG. Today between 55-60 MPH in non HOV lanes averaged 53.4 MPG. So yes, in my car closer to 55 does increase MPG.
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Jul 24, 2014 11:05:05 PM

Older vehicles that had larger engine displacement and were the V-type configuration had more torque power at the lower range of the total power band.

The shorter stroke higher revving powerful 4 cylinder engines with better ECM control DOHC and variable cam timing can cruise at a higher travel speed which is in harmony with the torque/HP. makes a switch a rue to keep engine energy levels proper for the newer multi speed tranny gearing changes

When torque drops off, HP still starts to deliver at the upper band range, when the trannies are in a lower gearing (downshift) or winding out the upper RPMs under heavier tall gearing loads.

The trannies let the torque increase at the transmission's output drive line delivered then to the drive wheels, then Performance is gained back and a bit of economy also in a lighter weight vehicle containing a much smaller size engine. It takes a total package of newer innovations combined to bring the economy back in order for cruise travel.

There are still bounds between travel speeds of different engine types/sizes/application. Bounds of finding the harmony best speed of each vehicle for cruise travel concerning fuel mileage/cost.
Profile Pic
Vin63
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:2,797
Points:678,400
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Jul 23, 2014 9:51:27 AM

It depends on your vehicle and its coefficient of drag.
Profile Pic
51stovi
All-Star Author Nashville

Posts:810
Points:613,750
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: Jul 23, 2014 9:36:58 AM

Don't drive less than the speed limit. It's a safety issue and annoying!
Profile Pic
93XtraCab
Rookie Author Maryland

Posts:11
Points:1,200
Joined:Jul 2014
Message Posted: Jul 22, 2014 12:56:10 PM

My truck is geared high because it is underpowered, so at 65 mph, it is screaming, so I stay off the freeways. 55 mph is much better for me.
Profile Pic
MertieMan
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:17,434
Points:3,510,135
Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 9:30:44 AM

You can't go out onto the interstates and drive these slow speeds unless you want to be killed.
Profile Pic
kingstorey
Rookie Author Grand Rapids

Posts:9
Points:88,230
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 4:32:22 AM

There is a difference
Profile Pic
fcdriver
Champion Author Tennessee

Posts:9,781
Points:2,068,315
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2014 4:05:13 AM

most people go much faster then that
Profile Pic
WilhamClouse
Champion Author Calgary

Posts:2,421
Points:575,030
Joined:Jun 2013
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2014 3:21:55 PM

75+
I prefer the faster speed over any fuel savings.

[Edited by: WilhamClouse at 7/20/2014 3:22:27 PM EST]
Profile Pic
Vin63
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:2,797
Points:678,400
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 9:46:16 AM

It depends on your vehicle's gearing and coefficient of drag.
Profile Pic
sanderstheparro
Champion Author Wilmington

Posts:1,786
Points:382,740
Joined:Dec 2013
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 9:30:40 AM

Generally, the faster you drive, the poorer your fuel economy.

As for 55 MPH vs. 65 MPH, it depends on the number of gears you have, aerodynamics and weight of the vehicle. Every vehicle has a sweet spot where they get the maximum miles per gallon whether at 55 or 65 mph. But generally, if you go beyond your sweet spot, your mileage economy begins to suffer greatly.
Profile Pic
MertieMan
Champion Author Lexington

Posts:17,434
Points:3,510,135
Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2014 8:08:47 AM

Drive these speeds on the interstates and get run over, especially I-75 southbound.
Profile Pic
GBMAX
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:7,224
Points:2,496,550
Joined:Feb 2005
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2014 10:44:54 PM

64 - 67
Profile Pic
dontuknowOH
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:3,568
Points:61,605
Joined:Aug 2009
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2014 7:05:54 PM

The big difference in engine design controls has made a big difference in how the power band of todays vehicles handle different road conditions/speed choices.

Older vehicle engines had distributors/timing devices that could get out of tune along with aging/engine wear/mileage build-up.

The modern engines have systems that stay in tune and can adjust energy performance as they are driven. Coil packs, EFI, variable cam timing, many sensors to monitor engine duties along with electric controlled automatic transmissions creates better mileage all done automatically.

Simply the engine can deliver more energy at the higher road speeds because of these refined systems(complexity)V/S the older design vehicles of "60's"...."mid "90's". Along with energy is better mileage with less HP.using(smaller engine size) One can look at the degree of windshield slope on the economy vehicles and tell that, even the front grill mass is less.

Much more all equals higher travel speed against the elements of physics(the planet Earth's resistive forces)with less fuel energy involved. Compare to the "Stagecoach days" Those engines had to be fed/watered 24-7!
Profile Pic
Boyrr
Champion Author Allentown

Posts:17,406
Points:3,762,130
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2014 6:40:05 AM

it all depends on the overall design, what gear ratios, ect.
Profile Pic
herbiepopnecker
Champion Author British Columbia

Posts:16,000
Points:3,071,885
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2014 1:59:41 AM

Yeah right, what's settled is exactly what speed the EPA set to determine highway mileage which is likely to still be stuck at the old double nickel.
They don't make an American car geared to deliver best mileage over 55-60. Experiment all you want, you'll find out fast enough.
Profile Pic
WilhamClouse
Champion Author Calgary

Posts:2,421
Points:575,030
Joined:Jun 2013
Message Posted: Jul 8, 2014 1:02:39 PM

don't really care....I go 75 mph+

[Edited by: WilhamClouse at 7/8/2014 1:03:04 PM EST]
Profile Pic
GrumpyCat
Champion Author Alabama

Posts:5,431
Points:1,276,015
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Jul 7, 2014 12:57:14 PM

"I've never calculated it but I'm sure the mpg. will go down above 60 mph. I will not drive over 70 mph. anywhere."

Thats what we call "Settled Science". "I'm so smart and know everything that I don't even have to experiment or measure. I know what the results will be."

The problem is that its not science if its "settled." Any "scientist" who is not aware of how many times "settled science" has been turned on its ear and proven wrong is not a scientist worth his salt.

As I have posted previously my 2000 Avalon XLS did better at 70 MPH than at 60 MPH. 2009 ML320BT gets 31 MPG at 60 or 29 at 70. 2001 Sonoma 2.2L 5-speed could get 27 at 60 MPH, or 20 at 70 MPH. Am told the V6 model got better MPG at 70 than my I4 model, but worse than the I4 at 60 MPH.

My point being its not settled science. You have to measure.
Post a reply Back to Topics